mental_floss magazine
SUBSCRIBE >
GIFT SUBSCRIPTIONS >
DIGITAL SUBSCRIPTIONS >
subscriber services >
We’re not sure when or where a photographer first asked his subjects to state the name of the delicious dairy product, but we do know that when you say “cheese,” the corners of your mouth turn up, your cheeks lift and your teeth show. It looks like a smile, and since smiling is what we do in pictures, the instruction seems pretty practical.
The deeper question, then, is: why is a smile the default expression for photographs? In her 2005 essay “Why We say ‘Cheese’: Producing the Smile in Snapshot Photography,” Christina Kotchemidova, an Assistant Professor in Mass Communication at Spring Hill College in Mobile, AL, puts forth an interesting hypothesis that deserves a look.
Picture-perfect smiles weren’t always the norm, says Kotchemidova. The photos of the nineteenth century were ruled by stony, solemn faces. These early photos took their cues from traditional European fine art portraiture, where smiles were only worn by peasants, children and drunks. The etiquette and beauty standards of the time also called for a small, tightly controlled mouth.
Then, sometime in the twentieth-century, the smile became king, ruling over snapshots with an iron fist.
Prior studies of the smile in photography, Kotchemidova says, relate its rise to “the speedy camera shutter, attractive faces in media and politics, and the rise of dental care,” technological and cultural factors that may have begun a process of “mouth liberalization.” Kotchemidova, though, proposes that we look at smiling for the camera as a cultural construction of twentieth-century American snapshot photography.
Photography was once a pursuit for the rich. A the turn of the century, though, Kodak’s $1 Brownie camera (introduced in 1900), combined with their line of how-to books and pamphlets for photographers and their heavy advertising in prominent national magazines (these were the days when everyone read Life), created a mass market for photography and established the company as the leading expert on the subject. Kodak came into a position of what Kotchemidova calls “cultural leadership,” by framing the way photography, for which they supplied the technology, was conceptualized and used in the culture at large.
In its leadership role, Kodak marketed photography as fun and easy. The company’s slogan, “You press the button, we do the rest,” assured consumers that the hard work, developing the film and printing the photos, was left to Kodak technicians, and that taking snapshots was easy enough for anyone. Kodak’s ads and photography publications presented taking photos as a happy experience for both the photographer and the subject that served to preserve fond memories of good times. One way that message was communicated was plenty of smiling faces on happy consumers, which conveniently provided “a model for how subjects should look,” that quickly spread along with the adoption of the technology.
Kotchemidova concludes that Kodak’s position of leadership in the culture of photography and their saturation of the ads, magazines and their own publications with images of smiling faces allowed the company to define the standards and aesthetics of good snapshots, and smiling for the camera became the cultural norm.
For further reading: Kotchemidova, C. “Why we say ‘cheese’: Producing the smile in snapshot photography.” Critical Studies in Media Communication, 22 (1), 2-25, winter 2005.
More from mental_floss…
Why Don’t School Buses Have Seat Belts?
*
Why Do Onions Make You Cry?
*
Can Men Breastfeed?
*
Why Does Everything Taste Bad After You Brush Your Teeth?
*
What’s So Premium About Premium Gasoline?
*
Why Is The Middle Finger Offensive?
Looking for smart gift ideas? In search of a new quirky t-shirt? Head over to the mental_floss store.
Cultural – critical scholarship … it all comes down to hegemony. You know, I really enjoyed this article/research until the ‘researchers’ starts talking about Kodak as the ‘big brother’ of photograpy, shaping social norms and such…
posted by ugh... on 6-3-2009 at 8:19 pm
Sounds like a lot of over-analysis to me. I’d always heard that the reason people didn’t smile in the old photos was because it took so long to expose the film, a relaxed face was much easier to maintain.
posted by Steve on 7-28-2009 at 3:40 pm
Umm…nice article, but doesn’t even attempt to explain the origin of saying “cheese.”
posted by Patrick on 8-7-2009 at 7:45 am
I think the word “Cheese” was explained at the beginning of the article–in saying the word it creates the smile. Interesting article.
posted by Ellie on 8-10-2009 at 8:41 pm
Hey Steve you are 100% right! Because it did take a longer time to expose the photo plate (it was a glass plate covered with a silver nitrate solution), subjects not only had a dour look on their faces, they were often forced have clamps on the back of their necks, arms and legs to ensure that they stayed still during the exposure. I image the smiles that occurred after the session would match anything you see today.
posted by Hawaii on 8-14-2009 at 3:45 pm
in iceland, they say “skyr”(yogurt).
posted by elizabeth-anne on 10-25-2009 at 10:58 am