mental_floss magazine
SUBSCRIBE >
GIFT SUBSCRIPTIONS >
DIGITAL SUBSCRIPTIONS >
subscriber services >
Benjamin Franklin said that nothing is certain in this world but death and taxes. In our more fast-paced times we might add the certainty of having to replace our iPods at least once every two years, but you get the point. Taxes are a part of the fabric of modern human society, yet they are totally beguiling to most ordinary folk. With laws like this, it’s no wonder.
You can thank Michael Jordan for this one. After Jordan’s Bulls put the hurt on the Los Angeles Lakers in the 1991 NBA Finals, the state of California began to enforce a nonresident income tax on visiting performers, especially athletes.
Basically, the tax applies to any income earned while competing or performing in California, and it allowed California’s Franchise Tax Board to reach into the pockets of Jordan, Pippen, et. al. to extract some revenge for the hard-court beatdown.
Not to be outdone, Illinois, and eventually 18 other states, instituted a jock tax, making a patchwork quilt of tax laws that basketball, baseball, and other sports figures have to consider. Thanks to these regulations, it’s more difficult to file a professional athlete’s tax return than to map the human genome on a Commodore 64.
In 1983, Arizona became the first state to implement a “Cannabis & Controlled Substances Tax” in order to boost state revenues and further punish those found guilty of possession. It works like this:
Sounds insane, right? Well, part of the code now on the books in more than 30 states says that the tax collection agency is not allowed to rat you out to the local law enforcement agency. This should put every drug dealer’s mind at ease, yet so few of them pay their required taxes. The truth is, many of these taxes are levied in arrears after the local constabulary has caught the criminal dealer. It’s really an additional fine for dealing that gets paid straight to the state coffers.
And what of those few people that pay the tax? Records show that the vast majority of them are stamp collectors.
For 2008 and 2009, the IRS is allowing a $500 exemption for each person that you help house from a Midwestern disaster (e.g. the floods in Iowa and surrounding states). In typical IRS fashion, the rules dictating who can and cannot be counted for this charitable act are both coldly technical, and moderately vague. Need more info? Check out the scintillating IRS Publication 4492-B. It’s a great beach read.

Arkansas has added getting a tattoo to its list of services that require an additional 6% state tax. One other service that’s subject to the tax is electrolysis. [Tattoo image courtesy of Inked Methods.]
You’ll never have to worry about this last tax since it was repealed in 1851, but it’s just too silly not to mention.
In 1696, a tax was placed on British homes based on the number of windows the home had. Previously the tax was levied per household, no matter the size of the house or the number of residents. The law changed, however, to levy higher taxes on larger homes with, presumably, more windows.
Instead of paying the higher taxes, people just bricked up the windows that they found to be extraneous. An astute visitor to England can still see evidence of this law today in the scores of walled up windows in older buildings throughout the country.
Looking for smart gift ideas? In search of a new quirky t-shirt? Head over to the mental_floss store.
Warning: “Inked Methods” (link in #4) is NSFW!
posted by Jeff on 4-8-2009 at 12:38 pm
Re: 5, apparently in Philadelphia they used to tax you on the number of steps you had in front of your house. I think I’m remembering that right….
posted by Kate on 4-8-2009 at 2:19 pm
Antebellum plantation homes in the south were often taxed based on size (i.e. square footage). But the size of a home was based on the rooms; hallways didn’t count.
So many of the large plantation homes have huge, wide hallways stretching from one end of the house to the other with smaller rooms on each side to increase the home’s size without increasing taxes.
ReCaptcha: insure horribly.
I’m a little scared.
posted by 8rustystaples on 4-8-2009 at 2:24 pm
There’s an easy way to fix this… the Fair Tax! It taxes people equally via a sales tax. A certain amount of money to buy personal necessities is not subject to the tax. But if we have to go with a tax, wouldn’t it be better to have it be applied equally, and without these insane rules?
posted by Carolyn on 4-8-2009 at 2:25 pm
Rusty and Kate, thanks for the Philly and Southern info. Fascinating stuff.
posted by Greg on 4-8-2009 at 3:16 pm
WOW – really NSFW. I’m not even sure that link is appropriate even with an NSFW warning.
posted by Steve on 4-8-2009 at 4:03 pm
Another case of taxes dictating architecture – in Boston taxes were based on square footage of the foundation, so you end up with floor-to-ceiling window bays on most of the buildings in the Back Bay.
posted by DoggyDad on 4-8-2009 at 4:49 pm
“Taxes are a part of the fabric of modern human society, yet they are totally beguiling to most ordinary folk.”
Taxes are bewitching to most people? Was that really the adjective you were looking for?
posted by lee on 4-8-2009 at 4:56 pm
very funny article. i just wish it wouldnt be so true! many of my connections at http://www.affluence.org that own businesses are being hit with a plethora of new taxes. these taxes are taking away the incentive for people to create real value (and JOBS!)
posted by sam on 4-10-2009 at 4:49 pm
Wow wow wow!!! My recaptcha was
Celtics 88…
Speaking of jock law.
posted by Chrystani on 5-11-2009 at 7:12 pm