<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 11 Variations on the Rubik&#8217;s Cube</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/11052/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/11052</link>
	<description>Feel Smart Again</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 10:01:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kitty</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/11052/comment-page-1#comment-478061</link>
		<dc:creator>kitty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 01:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/11052#comment-478061</guid>
		<description>Also, 
I found the Alexander’s Star to be much easier than the Rubik’s Cube itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also,<br />
I found the Alexander’s Star to be much easier than the Rubik’s Cube itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/11052/comment-page-1#comment-217776</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 18:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/11052#comment-217776</guid>
		<description>@Miss Cellania - I felt old too when I read Amy&#039;s comment LOL.. I got my first Rubik&#039;s cube in 6th grade - Xmas 1980 I believe.  Got the solution book along with it and memorized it the first night I had it. almost 30 years later I still remember it and can usually solve it in 60-90 seconds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Miss Cellania &#8211; I felt old too when I read Amy&#8217;s comment LOL.. I got my first Rubik&#8217;s cube in 6th grade &#8211; Xmas 1980 I believe.  Got the solution book along with it and memorized it the first night I had it. almost 30 years later I still remember it and can usually solve it in 60-90 seconds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mama Ilana</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/11052/comment-page-1#comment-217649</link>
		<dc:creator>Mama Ilana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 15:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/11052#comment-217649</guid>
		<description>I found the Alexander&#039;s Star to be much easier than the Rubik&#039;s Cube itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found the Alexander&#8217;s Star to be much easier than the Rubik&#8217;s Cube itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Betsy</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/11052/comment-page-1#comment-217598</link>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/11052#comment-217598</guid>
		<description>Re: #2 &quot;...cubes that must have all squares lined up in a certain orientation are more difficult, as they have a thousand times more possible configurations.&quot;  I believe any solved 3x3 cube, at least, would not have more than one possible configuration as far as orientation of the individual squares.
 
I have to agree on one thing though, Miss Cellania - Amy and her dad make me feel old too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: #2 &#8220;&#8230;cubes that must have all squares lined up in a certain orientation are more difficult, as they have a thousand times more possible configurations.&#8221;  I believe any solved 3&#215;3 cube, at least, would not have more than one possible configuration as far as orientation of the individual squares.</p>
<p>I have to agree on one thing though, Miss Cellania &#8211; Amy and her dad make me feel old too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mae</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/11052/comment-page-1#comment-217545</link>
		<dc:creator>Mae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 11:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/11052#comment-217545</guid>
		<description>I have a Square One which is not pictured here, but absolutely boggles my mind on almost a daily basis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a Square One which is not pictured here, but absolutely boggles my mind on almost a daily basis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jen</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/11052/comment-page-1#comment-48003</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 02:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/11052#comment-48003</guid>
		<description>I was in Budapest right before the Rubik&#039;s world championship this year.  Two guys staying in the same hostel as us were there to compete.  We watched them practising, and they could solve a normal (3x3) in under fourteen seconds.  We also watched them solve it blindfolded.  It was fascinating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was in Budapest right before the Rubik&#8217;s world championship this year.  Two guys staying in the same hostel as us were there to compete.  We watched them practising, and they could solve a normal (3&#215;3) in under fourteen seconds.  We also watched them solve it blindfolded.  It was fascinating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/11052/comment-page-1#comment-48000</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 02:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/11052#comment-48000</guid>
		<description>I also have a Rubicks Globe puzzle and have never solved it -I&#039;ve come pretty close and really don&#039;t know how I did it. I also have the flat Rubicks rings puzzle which is pretty easy to solve when you know the pattern.

A couple years ago I was given a Simpsons Rubics Cube - its Hommers head and has 8 wedges - still haven&#039;t solved it. Homer now looks like some bad science project. I also have a flat Simpons puzzle which solves exactly like the rings puzzle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also have a Rubicks Globe puzzle and have never solved it -I&#8217;ve come pretty close and really don&#8217;t know how I did it. I also have the flat Rubicks rings puzzle which is pretty easy to solve when you know the pattern.</p>
<p>A couple years ago I was given a Simpsons Rubics Cube &#8211; its Hommers head and has 8 wedges &#8211; still haven&#8217;t solved it. Homer now looks like some bad science project. I also have a flat Simpons puzzle which solves exactly like the rings puzzle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/11052/comment-page-1#comment-47963</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 22:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/11052#comment-47963</guid>
		<description>Tom, that makes no sense. If you got five sides, the 6th would, by default, also be done becuse there is nowhere else for those squares to be...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, that makes no sense. If you got five sides, the 6th would, by default, also be done becuse there is nowhere else for those squares to be&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TomH</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/11052/comment-page-1#comment-47891</link>
		<dc:creator>TomH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 18:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/11052#comment-47891</guid>
		<description>Great article!  We had the hardest time with Rubik&#039;s when it was new... after a night of drinking, my brother solved it in 2 minutes.  I gotta razz him about that!  (I&#039;ve only gotten 5 sides, but not the 6th.)

I&#039;ve totally forgotten about Alexander&#039;s Star - I had one, I wonder if mom still has it in her &quot;archives&quot;.  (ok, ok, I&#039;ve only solved 3 Rubik sides - at least you were paying attention...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article!  We had the hardest time with Rubik&#8217;s when it was new&#8230; after a night of drinking, my brother solved it in 2 minutes.  I gotta razz him about that!  (I&#8217;ve only gotten 5 sides, but not the 6th.)</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve totally forgotten about Alexander&#8217;s Star &#8211; I had one, I wonder if mom still has it in her &#8220;archives&#8221;.  (ok, ok, I&#8217;ve only solved 3 Rubik sides &#8211; at least you were paying attention&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renee Walker</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/11052/comment-page-1#comment-47886</link>
		<dc:creator>Renee Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 17:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/11052#comment-47886</guid>
		<description>Haha!  I took my Rubik&#039;s cube apart and put it back together too!  I DID actually SOLVE it the traditional way a few times and even had a tiny pair of (working) Rubikâ€™s cube earrings!  Still, Iâ€™d rather solve a good level of Tomb Raider any dayâ€¦</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha!  I took my Rubik&#8217;s cube apart and put it back together too!  I DID actually SOLVE it the traditional way a few times and even had a tiny pair of (working) Rubikâ€™s cube earrings!  Still, Iâ€™d rather solve a good level of Tomb Raider any dayâ€¦</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

