The First World War was an unprecedented catastrophe that killed millions and set the continent of Europe on the path to further calamity two decades later. But it didn’t come out of nowhere.
With the centennial of the outbreak of hostilities coming up in 2014, Erik Sass will be looking back at the lead-up to the war, when seemingly minor moments of friction accumulated until the situation was ready to explode. He’ll be covering those events 100 years after they occurred. This is the second installment in the series.
After the turmoil caused by the Second Moroccan Crisis, ending with a humiliating diplomatic defeat for Germany with the Treaty of Berlin in November 1911, Europe’s leaders were suddenly realizing that a general, continent-wide war was now a distinct possibility. While most of them still hoped to avoid this calamity, they felt compelled to start making serious preparations for the worst-case scenario.
In France, the top general, Joseph Joffre, was increasingly uneasy about the German threat—specifically the German plan of attack. In the event of war, Germany’s numerical advantage (68 million people versus 41 million for France) and superior industrial base would allow it to field a larger army. For their part, the French hoped to be able to neutralize these advantages with a string of forts behind their border with Germany.
But as Joffre suspected, the Germans had no intention of sending all their troops against heavy French fortifications in this area. Instead, they would form an uneven pincer, with the weaker arm attacking the French fortifications, and the stronger arm smashing through tiny, neutral Belgium for a surprise attack targeting Paris from the north. The Germans didn’t particularly care that this violation of Belgian sovereignty would elicit international outrage, as they were playing for all the marbles—and the victor writes the history books.
One hundred years ago today, on January 12, 1912, Joffre attended a meeting of the Superior Council of National Defense, France’s top civilian-military committee, where he asked for permission for French troops to advance into Belgium as soon as German troops attacked France — a preemptive move that would put France in the position of violating Belgian neutrality first, before Germany. But Premier Joseph Caillaux rejected the idea, arguing that France had to maintain the moral high ground, while noting that a French invasion of Belgium would give Germany a propaganda victory before the first shot was even fired. Joffre would meet with the same dogged resistance from Caillaux’s successor, Raymond Poincare, effectively frustrating the French military’s plans to blunt a German offensive through Belgium. In 1914, the result would be disastrous.
Meanwhile, the French weren’t the only ones busily freaking out about the suddenly-less-hypothetical possibility of a general war in Europe. Following the Second Moroccan Crisis, it became clear to Britain’s leaders that the two main branches of the British military, the Regular Army and the Royal Navy, did not see eye to eye when it came to emergency war planning.
Specifically, the Regular Army expected the Royal Navy to give top priority to transporting army units across the English Channel to France, where they were needed to help shore up French defenses against the expected German invasion. However at the Imperial War Council held on August 23, 1911, the navy leadership on the Board of Admiralty proposed that the British strategy should consist of amphibious assaults against Germany. If the Second Moroccan Crisis had actually resulted in war, this confusion and conflict could have crippled the British war effort, dooming their French allies.
In January 1912, the British government hurried to iron out the conflict between the Army and Navy by creating a new Naval War Staff responsible for managing the Navy in wartime—taking over many of the duties formerly assigned to the Board of Admiralty. Explaining this bureaucratic coup, the navy’s top civilian commander, First Lord Winston Churchill, emphasized: “It is necessary that there should be a close and whole-hearted cooperation between the War Staff at the Admiralty and the General Staff of the Army.”
Although Churchill would go on to have a baleful influence on wartime strategy with his support for the disastrous offensive at Gallipoli, the Naval War Staff he created would play a key role in coordinating overall British strategy in 1914.
For the next few years, Erik Sass will be serializing the lead-up to World War I, covering events 100 years after they happened.
More from mental_floss…
World War I Centennial: The Treaty of Berlin
*
The Great Gettysburg Reunion of 1913
*
5 Tyrants Who Died Relatively Peaceful Deaths (and 5 Who Weren’t So Lucky)
*
Why Did Muammar Qaddafi Own a Mansion in New Jersey?
*
Andrew Jackson’s Big Block of Cheese
Wonderful articles, thank you, Erik. I appreciate your clear, down-to-earth descriptions and explanations. I was always a little fuzzy on how WW1 got started – less so now, thanks to you!
posted by Long Pond Road on 1-12-2012 at 11:30 pm
I’m already enjoying this series, Erik, and am looking forward to more as the years pass. I’ve read a fair amount about WWI, but it’s really interesting to read about things on the anniversary of the events. Gives you a new perspective.
posted by Rachel on 1-13-2012 at 11:23 am
I think it was the French reluctance to dig in and assume defensive positions at the beginning of the war, rather than their failure to violate Belgian neutrality, which was the biggest problem with French war planning. At the beginning of the war, the French high command was reluctant to issue shovels or heavy artillery because their lessons in the Franco-Prussian War led them to believe that speed and offensive initiative would win this conflict. Of course, they couldn’t have been more wrong and a pre-emptive invasion of Belgium based on this philosophy would have been no less disastrous.
Besides, it was the German violation of Belgian neutrality which brought the British into the war on France’s side. All the British had been obligated to provide, under the terms of their alliance with France, was naval protection of French interests in the North Sea.
posted by Manruss on 1-13-2012 at 1:13 pm
Erik, great stuff! Will you be doing something similar to @RealTimeWWII? The perspective this brings to the conflict is amazing.
posted by Brent on 1-13-2012 at 2:23 pm
Erik, thanks again for another article. Was just musing to myself the other day that I wish another installment would be published and viola! here it is. My only regret is the spacing between each installment but it is worth it. Especially as you post on the actually anniversary of the events.
Look foward to the future installments.
Also, although it is historical fiction, the first book of Ken Follett’s new trilogy series (beginning in 2010 with next installment due this fall) addresses the lead up to, during and after WWI and the Russian Revolution. Wonderful read for anyone interested. Already read it twice!
posted by izzi on 1-13-2012 at 5:59 pm
Warn the Duke!
posted by Megan on 1-13-2012 at 11:34 pm
“The Treaty of Berlin” link on this page is broken. The “h” in “http:” is missing. I ended up right clicking on the link and opening it in a new tab and added the “h” manually in the address bar. Just letting you know.
My school never taught us anything about The Great War, and I have no idea why.
posted by Lehmen on 1-14-2012 at 12:59 am
A very nice article and a wonderful idea for a run-up to that terrible war. However, it was not disastrous for the French to have entered Belgium first; it was disastrous that they put only one corps to face 3 German corps as the Germans went through Belgium. If the French had entered first, Britain would not have entered the war (at least that early) and no British troops would have been present on the Marne, or at Ypres during the “race to the sea”. Not allowing Joffre to charge into Belgium was a smart political decision…and the kind of decision that Imperial Germany kept failing to make.
posted by Flandall on 1-14-2012 at 1:32 pm
If any teachers are looking for a World War one lesson plan that gets kids involved and makes learning fun, check out “world war 1 simulations” . its probably ranked in the top 20 on google and can be found at history simulation dot com.
posted by David Harms on 1-15-2012 at 8:53 pm
I loved this article. Is there any way to get an email reminder when a new article is posted?
posted by Mike on 1-26-2012 at 8:59 am