<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The First Time News Was Fit To Print, XXVIII</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/11581/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/11581</link>
	<description>Feel Smart Again</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:07:35 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/11581/comment-page-1#comment-56598</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 20:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/11581#comment-56598</guid>
		<description>Actually, you&#039;re right. It didn&#039;t come up when I searched &quot;mick jagger&quot; (see search results here: query.nytimes.com/search/query?query=%22mick+jagger%22&amp;d=&amp;o=&amp;v=&amp;c=&amp;n=10&amp;dp=0&amp;daterange=period&amp;srcht=a&amp;year1=1851&amp;mon1=09&amp;day1=18&amp;year2=1980&amp;mon2=12&amp;day2=31&amp;srchst=p&amp;sort=oldest)

But when I searched &quot;rolling stones,&quot; an article from three months earlier mentioned the Stones&#039; arrival in NY:

&quot;Another British singing group, this one a rock &#039;n&#039; roll quintet called the Rolling Stones, arrived in New York by plane yesterday from London for a three-week singing tour of the United States and Canada.&quot;

The last paragraph lists the members of the band, Jagger included. 

I&#039;m still not sure why that didn&#039;t show up. Oh well. Good comment, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, you&#8217;re right. It didn&#8217;t come up when I searched &#8220;mick jagger&#8221; (see search results here: query.nytimes.com/search/query?query=%22mick+jagger%22&#038;d=&#038;o=&#038;v=&#038;c=&#038;n=10&#038;dp=0&#038;daterange=period&#038;srcht=a&#038;year1=1851&#038;mon1=09&#038;day1=18&#038;year2=1980&#038;mon2=12&#038;day2=31&#038;srchst=p&#038;sort=oldest)</p>
<p>But when I searched &#8220;rolling stones,&#8221; an article from three months earlier mentioned the Stones&#8217; arrival in NY:</p>
<p>&#8220;Another British singing group, this one a rock &#8216;n&#8217; roll quintet called the Rolling Stones, arrived in New York by plane yesterday from London for a three-week singing tour of the United States and Canada.&#8221;</p>
<p>The last paragraph lists the members of the band, Jagger included. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m still not sure why that didn&#8217;t show up. Oh well. Good comment, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/11581/comment-page-1#comment-56591</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 19:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/11581#comment-56591</guid>
		<description>That hair article is the first time Mick Jagger was mentioned? Really?

The familiarity with which the writer refers to the Rolling Stones makes me think that maybe they&#039;d covered the band before.

Or were you going for the first time he was quoted?

Either way, the article looks like it must be hilarious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That hair article is the first time Mick Jagger was mentioned? Really?</p>
<p>The familiarity with which the writer refers to the Rolling Stones makes me think that maybe they&#8217;d covered the band before.</p>
<p>Or were you going for the first time he was quoted?</p>
<p>Either way, the article looks like it must be hilarious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
