mental_floss magazine
SUBSCRIBE >
GIFT SUBSCRIPTIONS >
DIGITAL SUBSCRIPTIONS >
subscriber services >


Melchior d’Hondecoeter was a 17th-century Dutch painter who specialized in birds. He died exactly 313 years ago on this date, at the age of 61. So let’s take a look at Melchior d’Hondecoeter’s life and his 1683 painting, “Peacocks.”
1. Like many artists, Melchior d’Hondecoeter was born into a family of other talented artists. Both his father, Gijsbert, and his grandfather, Gillis, were also established painters specializing in birds. Melchior initially studied under his father but, upon his father’s death, took up study under his uncle, Jan Baptist Weenix, a renowned Italianate painter.
2. Despite his family’s artistic tendencies, when Melchior was young, his mother and uncle were unsure whether he should be trained as a painter. Supposedly, the young Melchior was extremely religious and had a tendency to pray very loudly.
3. Melchior’s early paintings were actually sea and fish scenes, including one entitled, “Tub with Fish,” from 1655. He eventually gave in to the family preference for birds, though, and almost all of his other paintings are of birds.
4. Melchior was known for realistic and accurate depictions of birds; some people deemed him even better than his father and grandfather. Yet what really made Melchior’s paintings of birds stand out was that he painted the birds as living beings “with passions, joys, fears, and quarrels.” One critic went so far as to say, “Hondecoeter displays the maternity of the hen with as much tenderness and feeling as Raphael the maternity of Madonnas.”
5. Although most, if not all, of Melchior’s paintings are signed, he rarely dated his paintings. The 1905 Catalogue of the Pictures in the Rijks-Museum (pages 162-164) includes copies of his signatures next to the descriptions of the paintings on which they appear.
A larger version of “Peacocks” is available here.
‘Feel Art Again’ appears every Tuesday and Thursday.
and let’s not forget, this served as Sweet P’s inspiration for that God-awful dress she made at the end of this season’s Project Runway..
Beautiful painting, though!
posted by Rebekka on 4-3-2008 at 3:58 pm
I was hoping Sweet P would be mentioned… and it could have been a gorgeous dress considering the inspiration
posted by Lauren on 4-3-2008 at 6:55 pm
I liked that dress :( I didn’t see any connecting to the painting, but I liked it and I’m not afraid to admit it.
posted by Sarah on 4-3-2008 at 10:11 pm
I love your FAA posts :) You wanted to suggestions for pre-1900’s women artists, how about Artemesia Ghentelleschi? (Sorry if I butchered the spelling of that name, she did The Slaying of Holofernes)
posted by Megan on 4-3-2008 at 11:06 pm
Megan: Thank you! I’ll look into her.
posted by Andréa on 4-3-2008 at 11:25 pm
So glad I am not the only one who thought Sweet P dropped the ball with that dress (and I like Sweet P). An amazingly beautiful painting should have inspired an amazing dress.
posted by JaneM on 4-4-2008 at 7:53 am
Catching up late with the FAA posts… This painting seems rather eerie to me. this guy’s talent in indisputable, but I’m not sure I’d like having a painting like this in my living room.
posted by Therese on 4-10-2008 at 11:55 am