<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Debunking Grammar Myths</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/14636/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/14636</link>
	<description>Feel Smart Again</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun,  8 Nov 2009 15:56:41 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: greenstrawberries</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/14636/comment-page-1#comment-73769</link>
		<dc:creator>greenstrawberries</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 08:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/14636#comment-73769</guid>
		<description>The whole reason that teachers tell students not to start sentences with conjunctions (because, and, etc.) is because they do it incorrectly. I tell my students (1st grade) that fact. They will eventually be able to use those words at the beginning of a sentence, but it&#039;s hard to do, so we just tell them not to at first. 
When I was in high school, we were not allowed to use &quot;be verbs&quot; in papers. (am, is, are, were, be, being, have, had) The theory was that it forced you to write using active verbs. The problem was that you wound up with really long convoluted sentences, and sometimes, you need to use a &quot;be verb!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The whole reason that teachers tell students not to start sentences with conjunctions (because, and, etc.) is because they do it incorrectly. I tell my students (1st grade) that fact. They will eventually be able to use those words at the beginning of a sentence, but it&#8217;s hard to do, so we just tell them not to at first.<br />
When I was in high school, we were not allowed to use &#8220;be verbs&#8221; in papers. (am, is, are, were, be, being, have, had) The theory was that it forced you to write using active verbs. The problem was that you wound up with really long convoluted sentences, and sometimes, you need to use a &#8220;be verb!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brea</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/14636/comment-page-1#comment-71941</link>
		<dc:creator>Brea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 13:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/14636#comment-71941</guid>
		<description>When is it ok or better to use a dash?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When is it ok or better to use a dash?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jen</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/14636/comment-page-1#comment-71934</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 13:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/14636#comment-71934</guid>
		<description>If I may add another caveat to the use of semicolons, in addition to the excellent explanations that have gone before, it would be that the two independent clauses need to be fairly short.  Otherwise, you are better off  creating two sentences.  Semicolons are best used when you have two short, closely related complete statements that you want to express in one sentence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I may add another caveat to the use of semicolons, in addition to the excellent explanations that have gone before, it would be that the two independent clauses need to be fairly short.  Otherwise, you are better off  creating two sentences.  Semicolons are best used when you have two short, closely related complete statements that you want to express in one sentence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josly</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/14636/comment-page-1#comment-71891</link>
		<dc:creator>Josly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 06:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/14636#comment-71891</guid>
		<description>Great article. I’ve always felt bad because I’m of the generation that was never taught grammar, and thus, have a horrid inferiority complex about it. Sometimes, just “feeling” it doesn’t work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article. I’ve always felt bad because I’m of the generation that was never taught grammar, and thus, have a horrid inferiority complex about it. Sometimes, just “feeling” it doesn’t work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/14636/comment-page-1#comment-71890</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 05:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/14636#comment-71890</guid>
		<description>Great article. I&#039;ve always felt bad because I&#039;m of the generation that was never taught grammar, and thus, have a horrid inferiority complex about it. Sometimes, just &quot;feeling&quot; it doesn&#039;t work.

I have a question to ask: How is the word &quot;namely&quot; used?

For instance, would this sentence be correct? --&gt; There are two types of people, namely happy and sad.

Or does it work like &quot;includes&quot;, where the examples cited must be less than the number that exist?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article. I&#8217;ve always felt bad because I&#8217;m of the generation that was never taught grammar, and thus, have a horrid inferiority complex about it. Sometimes, just &#8220;feeling&#8221; it doesn&#8217;t work.</p>
<p>I have a question to ask: How is the word &#8220;namely&#8221; used?</p>
<p>For instance, would this sentence be correct? &#8211;&gt; There are two types of people, namely happy and sad.</p>
<p>Or does it work like &#8220;includes&#8221;, where the examples cited must be less than the number that exist?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PartiallyDeflected</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/14636/comment-page-1#comment-71879</link>
		<dc:creator>PartiallyDeflected</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 03:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/14636#comment-71879</guid>
		<description>My favorite sentence ending with multiple prepositions is when a parent brought the wrong book upstairs to read to his son and the little boy asked, &quot;What did you bring the book I didn&#039;t want you to read out of up for?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My favorite sentence ending with multiple prepositions is when a parent brought the wrong book upstairs to read to his son and the little boy asked, &#8220;What did you bring the book I didn&#8217;t want you to read out of up for?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arch</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/14636/comment-page-1#comment-71862</link>
		<dc:creator>arch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 00:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/14636#comment-71862</guid>
		<description>I heard that the double negative reply was &quot;Yeah, right.&quot; Scans better. 
 How about an old joke? An American is standing at an London bus stop, an Englishman approaches: &quot;What&#039;s up?&quot;, says the Yank. The Pom replies, &quot;Sir, in my country we do not end a sentence with a preposition.&quot; &quot;Okay&quot;, says the Yank, &quot;What&#039;s up... jerk?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard that the double negative reply was &#8220;Yeah, right.&#8221; Scans better.<br />
 How about an old joke? An American is standing at an London bus stop, an Englishman approaches: &#8220;What&#8217;s up?&#8221;, says the Yank. The Pom replies, &#8220;Sir, in my country we do not end a sentence with a preposition.&#8221; &#8220;Okay&#8221;, says the Yank, &#8220;What&#8217;s up&#8230; jerk?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Therese</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/14636/comment-page-1#comment-71859</link>
		<dc:creator>Therese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 00:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/14636#comment-71859</guid>
		<description>It always warms my little heart, when reading a post such as this, to see how much enthusiasm there is for grammar.  What a contrast from my youth!

SongLee, when I was pursuing my English degree (which, I&#039;m happy to add, I completed with unequivocal success), grammar rules seemed far less important than they were in my earlier years. Maybe that&#039;s because most people majoring in English have learned the rules well enough that professors are able to concentrate on loftier topics.

S michael c, I join you in bemoaning the neglect of sentence diagramming.  Yes, it is a very good exercise that leads to a deeper understanding of how our language works.  The most fun I had with diagramming (and that&#039;s saying a lot!) was in a linguistics course in college.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It always warms my little heart, when reading a post such as this, to see how much enthusiasm there is for grammar.  What a contrast from my youth!</p>
<p>SongLee, when I was pursuing my English degree (which, I&#8217;m happy to add, I completed with unequivocal success), grammar rules seemed far less important than they were in my earlier years. Maybe that&#8217;s because most people majoring in English have learned the rules well enough that professors are able to concentrate on loftier topics.</p>
<p>S michael c, I join you in bemoaning the neglect of sentence diagramming.  Yes, it is a very good exercise that leads to a deeper understanding of how our language works.  The most fun I had with diagramming (and that&#8217;s saying a lot!) was in a linguistics course in college.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eileen</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/14636/comment-page-1#comment-71850</link>
		<dc:creator>Eileen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 22:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/14636#comment-71850</guid>
		<description>I really enjoyed this post.
Thanks! I&#039;m looking forward to more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really enjoyed this post.<br />
Thanks! I&#8217;m looking forward to more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy James</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/14636/comment-page-1#comment-71846</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 22:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/14636#comment-71846</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m reminded of a Kurt vonnegut line, something to the effect of &quot;Semicolons are worthless. All they do is show that you went to college.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m reminded of a Kurt vonnegut line, something to the effect of &#8220;Semicolons are worthless. All they do is show that you went to college.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
