<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brain Game: Noggin Numbers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/14939/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/14939</link>
	<description>Feel Smart Again</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:37:07 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: emit</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/14939/comment-page-1#comment-74243</link>
		<dc:creator>emit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 11:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/14939#comment-74243</guid>
		<description>A few days late with this, but: Actually, michael, the number 6.022x10^23 _is_ an integer, namely 6022 followed by 20 zeroes. (Huge!) However, that value is not exact - it is only an approximation. I don&#039;t know how precise the latest estimate of the number is, but I am pretty sure that the number of significant figures is (and will perhaps be for as long as we live) much less than 23, so in any calculation we will use an integer for the value.

Then some argue that the exact value is indeed an integer as well. It is defined as the number of carbon atoms in exactly 12 grammes of a certain carbon isotope. And then one may ask whether we are speaking of whole atoms or if we allow &quot;partial atoms&quot; to fill up our 12 grammes.

I can&#039;t imagine anyone calculating anything with that kind of accuracy anyway, so it doesn&#039;t matter so much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few days late with this, but: Actually, michael, the number 6.022&#215;10^23 _is_ an integer, namely 6022 followed by 20 zeroes. (Huge!) However, that value is not exact &#8211; it is only an approximation. I don&#8217;t know how precise the latest estimate of the number is, but I am pretty sure that the number of significant figures is (and will perhaps be for as long as we live) much less than 23, so in any calculation we will use an integer for the value.</p>
<p>Then some argue that the exact value is indeed an integer as well. It is defined as the number of carbon atoms in exactly 12 grammes of a certain carbon isotope. And then one may ask whether we are speaking of whole atoms or if we allow &#8220;partial atoms&#8221; to fill up our 12 grammes.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t imagine anyone calculating anything with that kind of accuracy anyway, so it doesn&#8217;t matter so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/14939/comment-page-1#comment-73937</link>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 03:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/14939#comment-73937</guid>
		<description>avogadro&#039;s number wouldnt be an integer even if you included any word which represents a numerical value (6.022x10^23 is not an integer because it cannot be represented without a decimal or fraction).

also, the answer to the introductory riddle (&quot;Isn’t it unusual that there are words that represent numbers, but not numbers that represent words?&quot;) is that speech is primary to writing. in other words, that claim has it backwards - the word &quot;eight&quot; does not represent &quot;8&quot;; rather, &quot;8&quot; represents &quot;eight.&quot; the names for numbers are words even if they were never written down as numerals. having numbers represent words would be pretty bizarre because our writing generally mirrors our spoken language, not the other way around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>avogadro&#8217;s number wouldnt be an integer even if you included any word which represents a numerical value (6.022&#215;10^23 is not an integer because it cannot be represented without a decimal or fraction).</p>
<p>also, the answer to the introductory riddle (&#8221;Isn’t it unusual that there are words that represent numbers, but not numbers that represent words?&#8221;) is that speech is primary to writing. in other words, that claim has it backwards &#8211; the word &#8220;eight&#8221; does not represent &#8220;8&#8243;; rather, &#8220;8&#8243; represents &#8220;eight.&#8221; the names for numbers are words even if they were never written down as numerals. having numbers represent words would be pretty bizarre because our writing generally mirrors our spoken language, not the other way around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heather</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/14939/comment-page-1#comment-73688</link>
		<dc:creator>heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 19:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/14939#comment-73688</guid>
		<description>Five and zero, respectively</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Five and zero, respectively</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katie</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/14939/comment-page-1#comment-73664</link>
		<dc:creator>Katie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 17:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/14939#comment-73664</guid>
		<description>Way to appeal the the linguistically-minded of us - I got this one without looking!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Way to appeal the the linguistically-minded of us &#8211; I got this one without looking!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/14939/comment-page-1#comment-73661</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 17:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/14939#comment-73661</guid>
		<description>The phrasing of the question is important:  he&#039;s asking about integers specifically and not just numbers in general or counting words.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The phrasing of the question is important:  he&#8217;s asking about integers specifically and not just numbers in general or counting words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scot</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/14939/comment-page-1#comment-73627</link>
		<dc:creator>Scot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 15:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/14939#comment-73627</guid>
		<description>What about &quot;a hundred&quot; and &quot;zilch&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about &#8220;a hundred&#8221; and &#8220;zilch&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/14939/comment-page-1#comment-73608</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 14:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/14939#comment-73608</guid>
		<description>If you count &quot;aught&quot; then it&#039;s the same number for first and last...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you count &#8220;aught&#8221; then it&#8217;s the same number for first and last&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emit</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/14939/comment-page-1#comment-73596</link>
		<dc:creator>emit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 14:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/14939#comment-73596</guid>
		<description>Is &quot;Avogadro&#039;s constant&quot; an integer? It counts the number of somethings in a mole of somethings, so...?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is &#8220;Avogadro&#8217;s constant&#8221; an integer? It counts the number of somethings in a mole of somethings, so&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: septer</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/14939/comment-page-1#comment-73594</link>
		<dc:creator>septer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 14:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/14939#comment-73594</guid>
		<description>Danno...rihgto! Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Danno&#8230;rihgto! Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danno</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/14939/comment-page-1#comment-73576</link>
		<dc:creator>Danno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 13:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/14939#comment-73576</guid>
		<description>&quot;one billion&quot; is an integer.  &quot;billion&quot; isn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;one billion&#8221; is an integer.  &#8220;billion&#8221; isn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
