<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who Needs Paper?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15378/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15378</link>
	<description>Feel Smart Again</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:09:04 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ellen Pizza</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15378/comment-page-1#comment-76510</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellen Pizza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 17:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15378#comment-76510</guid>
		<description>Remember, addressing the dire problem of a lack of space in our landfills more appropriately addresses the recycling issue. Paper is made from a re-newable resource: trees!

If you really want to make an environmental impact, make sure the paper you use is made from a mill located in the United States where the industry is strictly monitored by the EPA. Pulping processes are required (by law)to be free of elemental chlorine, resulting in emmisions that contain no detectable dioxins, unlike the off-shore grades that are made without a governing body like the EPA. Off-shore grades may be cheap, but are they worth the price we will all eventually pay?

All paper mills in the USA are today on the &quot;brighter shade of green&quot; complying to manufacturing standards in paper making unparalleled by any other country in the world. 

By the way...all USA manufactured  paper pulp is archival resulting in acid free paper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember, addressing the dire problem of a lack of space in our landfills more appropriately addresses the recycling issue. Paper is made from a re-newable resource: trees!</p>
<p>If you really want to make an environmental impact, make sure the paper you use is made from a mill located in the United States where the industry is strictly monitored by the EPA. Pulping processes are required (by law)to be free of elemental chlorine, resulting in emmisions that contain no detectable dioxins, unlike the off-shore grades that are made without a governing body like the EPA. Off-shore grades may be cheap, but are they worth the price we will all eventually pay?</p>
<p>All paper mills in the USA are today on the &#8220;brighter shade of green&#8221; complying to manufacturing standards in paper making unparalleled by any other country in the world. </p>
<p>By the way&#8230;all USA manufactured  paper pulp is archival resulting in acid free paper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Schmid</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15378/comment-page-1#comment-76444</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Schmid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 20:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15378#comment-76444</guid>
		<description>Folks:

I&#039;ve heard scientist friends tell me that burying paper or putting it into a landfill where it turns to mulch is called carbon sequestration. Cutting down trees to clear space for new trees, and burying (not burning) the harvested trees (or making furniture or floors) is the best way to reverse global warming. 

I&#039;ve heard others claim that the energy used to recycle exhausts more carbon than is used to make virgin paper. 

I&#039;ve heard others say that recycling paper is important, and we should bury the trees because there is energy concentrated in the finished paper product. 

I&#039;ve heard a lot of people *saying* things, with contradictory conclusions, but they are for the most part opinions without any science. 

I don&#039;t know what to tell you, other than it might not be all bad to put paper into landfills.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Folks:</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard scientist friends tell me that burying paper or putting it into a landfill where it turns to mulch is called carbon sequestration. Cutting down trees to clear space for new trees, and burying (not burning) the harvested trees (or making furniture or floors) is the best way to reverse global warming. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard others claim that the energy used to recycle exhausts more carbon than is used to make virgin paper. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard others say that recycling paper is important, and we should bury the trees because there is energy concentrated in the finished paper product. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard a lot of people *saying* things, with contradictory conclusions, but they are for the most part opinions without any science. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know what to tell you, other than it might not be all bad to put paper into landfills.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lulu</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15378/comment-page-1#comment-76437</link>
		<dc:creator>Lulu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 19:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15378#comment-76437</guid>
		<description>Re:  Paper alternatives

Punk trees in Fla are eradicated because there are exotics and ruining the natural environment.

A VERY fine quality paper can be made from it.  It might take an artist or craftsperson to make paper from punk, but the result is a paper finer than the best Japanese.  Try it--

Could it be made comercially?  In what quantities?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re:  Paper alternatives</p>
<p>Punk trees in Fla are eradicated because there are exotics and ruining the natural environment.</p>
<p>A VERY fine quality paper can be made from it.  It might take an artist or craftsperson to make paper from punk, but the result is a paper finer than the best Japanese.  Try it&#8211;</p>
<p>Could it be made comercially?  In what quantities?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cb</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15378/comment-page-1#comment-76433</link>
		<dc:creator>cb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 19:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15378#comment-76433</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure this is showing my naiveté, but what happens to recylcable material that ends up in a landfill?  I understand that the health concerns would probably be drastic, but what is the cost-benefit ratio of going through garbage for items that can be recycled?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure this is showing my naiveté, but what happens to recylcable material that ends up in a landfill?  I understand that the health concerns would probably be drastic, but what is the cost-benefit ratio of going through garbage for items that can be recycled?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: n2y2</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15378/comment-page-1#comment-76430</link>
		<dc:creator>n2y2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 19:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15378#comment-76430</guid>
		<description>The reason that recycled paper is more expensive:  There is a lot of cleanup that must be done to recycled paper.  After the paper is smashed up into a slurry, all of the &#039;imperfections&#039; must be removed.  That is the coloring of the paper, the ink, the graphite, etc.  Two of the most difficult chemicals to remove are laser printer toner (which is essentially a plastic) and post-it note glue.  It really contributes to the cost of the process.    I have read that they are working on some designer bacteria to make the process cheaper.

I understand that paper is not endlessly recyclable.   To make paper, there needs to be long cellulose fibers.  Each time a sheet of paper is recycled, those fibers get shorter.  After a few trips through the mill, the fibers get too short to be usable.

Last point:  Hemp has an interesting history in the US.  At one point the government actively encouraged farmers to grow it. (&quot;Ditch Weed&quot; still grows wild in the Midwest.)  Dupont and Hearst teamed up to sully the crop.  The story would make for a good Mental Floss article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason that recycled paper is more expensive:  There is a lot of cleanup that must be done to recycled paper.  After the paper is smashed up into a slurry, all of the &#8216;imperfections&#8217; must be removed.  That is the coloring of the paper, the ink, the graphite, etc.  Two of the most difficult chemicals to remove are laser printer toner (which is essentially a plastic) and post-it note glue.  It really contributes to the cost of the process.    I have read that they are working on some designer bacteria to make the process cheaper.</p>
<p>I understand that paper is not endlessly recyclable.   To make paper, there needs to be long cellulose fibers.  Each time a sheet of paper is recycled, those fibers get shorter.  After a few trips through the mill, the fibers get too short to be usable.</p>
<p>Last point:  Hemp has an interesting history in the US.  At one point the government actively encouraged farmers to grow it. (&#8221;Ditch Weed&#8221; still grows wild in the Midwest.)  Dupont and Hearst teamed up to sully the crop.  The story would make for a good Mental Floss article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Konstantine</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15378/comment-page-1#comment-76428</link>
		<dc:creator>Konstantine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 19:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15378#comment-76428</guid>
		<description>@ Fruppi - 

Switch the locations of the recycle bin and the trash can. Make then walk further to throw paper away.

Make the laziness work for you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Fruppi &#8211; </p>
<p>Switch the locations of the recycle bin and the trash can. Make then walk further to throw paper away.</p>
<p>Make the laziness work for you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shasta McNasty</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15378/comment-page-1#comment-76427</link>
		<dc:creator>Shasta McNasty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 19:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15378#comment-76427</guid>
		<description>Mattheous knows the score. Recycled paper and new types of paper sound awesome...as long as they&#039;re preservationally sound!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mattheous knows the score. Recycled paper and new types of paper sound awesome&#8230;as long as they&#8217;re preservationally sound!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mattheous</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15378/comment-page-1#comment-76422</link>
		<dc:creator>Mattheous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 18:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15378#comment-76422</guid>
		<description>Personally, I&#039;m all for not reading magazines. But I&#039;m also a bibliophile, so I don&#039;t think we should get rid of paper entirely. Also, that recycled paper better be acid free, or you won&#039;t see me using it for my precious Moleskines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I&#8217;m all for not reading magazines. But I&#8217;m also a bibliophile, so I don&#8217;t think we should get rid of paper entirely. Also, that recycled paper better be acid free, or you won&#8217;t see me using it for my precious Moleskines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fruppi</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15378/comment-page-1#comment-76408</link>
		<dc:creator>Fruppi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 16:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15378#comment-76408</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad you used Dwight for your Dunder Mifflin reference...at least he is helping to put back some of the paper waste he his making...if you remember from the Launch Party episode, he grows hemp!

Seriously though, I use a lot of paper in my classroom and I struggle to get the kids to walk the extra few steps across the room to recycle their old papers instead of throwing them away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad you used Dwight for your Dunder Mifflin reference&#8230;at least he is helping to put back some of the paper waste he his making&#8230;if you remember from the Launch Party episode, he grows hemp!</p>
<p>Seriously though, I use a lot of paper in my classroom and I struggle to get the kids to walk the extra few steps across the room to recycle their old papers instead of throwing them away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
