<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Our Scandalous Vice Presidents</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15456/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15456</link>
	<description>Feel Smart Again</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:55:18 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Texas Pride</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15456/comment-page-1#comment-126066</link>
		<dc:creator>Texas Pride</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 02:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15456#comment-126066</guid>
		<description>Very interesting article- I had no idea we had such crazy VPs.

One mistake though:  Section 6 states that John Tyler &quot;annexed the Republic of Texas&quot; but this is not true.  Texas was an independent nation and so is the only state to enter the United States under a TREATY, and not annexation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting article- I had no idea we had such crazy VPs.</p>
<p>One mistake though:  Section 6 states that John Tyler &#8220;annexed the Republic of Texas&#8221; but this is not true.  Texas was an independent nation and so is the only state to enter the United States under a TREATY, and not annexation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kati</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15456/comment-page-1#comment-113956</link>
		<dc:creator>Kati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 08:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15456#comment-113956</guid>
		<description>Great article! Some VPs are craaaazy. I&#039;m related to John Nance Garner (something silly like 5th cousins, 8 times removed), FDR&#039;s first VP. I know little about him except he was a &quot;mean whisky-drinking Texas politician&quot; and, in high school, he was quoted in my government textbook as saying, &quot;The vice presidency isn&#039;t worth a warm jar of spit.&quot; Later, I learned through Wikipedia that he actually said &quot;piss&quot;, not &quot;spit&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article! Some VPs are craaaazy. I&#8217;m related to John Nance Garner (something silly like 5th cousins, 8 times removed), FDR&#8217;s first VP. I know little about him except he was a &#8220;mean whisky-drinking Texas politician&#8221; and, in high school, he was quoted in my government textbook as saying, &#8220;The vice presidency isn&#8217;t worth a warm jar of spit.&#8221; Later, I learned through Wikipedia that he actually said &#8220;piss&#8221;, not &#8220;spit&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. E</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15456/comment-page-1#comment-101017</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 21:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15456#comment-101017</guid>
		<description>AndrewJohnson was impeached for violating the Tenureof Office Act.  This was a law that was passed by the Radical Republican Congress that forbade the President from Dismissing any member of The Cabinet.  Johnson, rightly so, declared the law unconstitutional, and fired E.M. Stanton, the Secretary of War who had been appointed by Lincoln as who was a darling of the Radicals.  
   It has been reported in many areas, including a story in J.F. K.&#039;s Profiles in Courage, that the margin that kept Johnson from being convicted after his impeachment of one vote was made more to uphold the Office of The President of the United States than anything else</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AndrewJohnson was impeached for violating the Tenureof Office Act.  This was a law that was passed by the Radical Republican Congress that forbade the President from Dismissing any member of The Cabinet.  Johnson, rightly so, declared the law unconstitutional, and fired E.M. Stanton, the Secretary of War who had been appointed by Lincoln as who was a darling of the Radicals.<br />
   It has been reported in many areas, including a story in J.F. K.&#8217;s Profiles in Courage, that the margin that kept Johnson from being convicted after his impeachment of one vote was made more to uphold the Office of The President of the United States than anything else</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lew</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15456/comment-page-1#comment-86027</link>
		<dc:creator>Lew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15456#comment-86027</guid>
		<description>Hey, you forgot Thomas R. Marshall, veep for Woodrow Wilson. What America needs is a good 5 cent cigar...and many other quotables.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, you forgot Thomas R. Marshall, veep for Woodrow Wilson. What America needs is a good 5 cent cigar&#8230;and many other quotables.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennings</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15456/comment-page-1#comment-85962</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 14:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15456#comment-85962</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to think that after he leaves office, Cheney might be included.  He can join Burr on the short list of VPs that have shot somebody while in the office.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to think that after he leaves office, Cheney might be included.  He can join Burr on the short list of VPs that have shot somebody while in the office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Em</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15456/comment-page-1#comment-85830</link>
		<dc:creator>Em</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 10:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15456#comment-85830</guid>
		<description>um...bedhead...have you *seen* our current VP lately?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>um&#8230;bedhead&#8230;have you *seen* our current VP lately?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David H.</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15456/comment-page-1#comment-85797</link>
		<dc:creator>David H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 20:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15456#comment-85797</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t think of TR as scandalous. He never came close to a scandal. Now Cheney? Maybe he&#039;ll be added to the list some day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t think of TR as scandalous. He never came close to a scandal. Now Cheney? Maybe he&#8217;ll be added to the list some day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eliana</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15456/comment-page-1#comment-77172</link>
		<dc:creator>eliana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 15:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15456#comment-77172</guid>
		<description>What criteria to do they use to pick the VP?

Some considerations include geographic balance, ideological balance, as with Reagan choosing George H.W. Bush, or ideological reinforcement, as with Clinton/Gore or Bush/Cheney.

So if it&#039;s balance, that would mean Obama selecting someone white, and McCain selecting someone that&#039;s not a crazy old hothead.

Balance doesn&#039;t have to mean skin color, but for McCain, yes, you&#039;re right.

More here: www.236.com/news/2008/06/05/faq_the_vice_presidency_6712.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What criteria to do they use to pick the VP?</p>
<p>Some considerations include geographic balance, ideological balance, as with Reagan choosing George H.W. Bush, or ideological reinforcement, as with Clinton/Gore or Bush/Cheney.</p>
<p>So if it&#8217;s balance, that would mean Obama selecting someone white, and McCain selecting someone that&#8217;s not a crazy old hothead.</p>
<p>Balance doesn&#8217;t have to mean skin color, but for McCain, yes, you&#8217;re right.</p>
<p>More here: <a href="http://www.236.com/news/2008/06/05/faq_the_vice_presidency_6712.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.236.com/news/2008/06/05/faq_the_vice_presidency_6712.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15456/comment-page-1#comment-76922</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 15:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15456#comment-76922</guid>
		<description>Interesting to hear that Nelson Rockefeller &quot;refused&quot; to run as Gerald Ford&#039;s Vice President in 1976.

I had always heard it that Ford kickecd Rocky off the ticket in favor of the more conservitive and more acceptly Republican Bob Dole. 

As for Nelson Rockefeller, nothing in his life became him - or made him more notorious - than his leaving it -- allegedly in the arms - and the bed - of a young mistress / staffer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting to hear that Nelson Rockefeller &#8220;refused&#8221; to run as Gerald Ford&#8217;s Vice President in 1976.</p>
<p>I had always heard it that Ford kickecd Rocky off the ticket in favor of the more conservitive and more acceptly Republican Bob Dole. </p>
<p>As for Nelson Rockefeller, nothing in his life became him &#8211; or made him more notorious &#8211; than his leaving it &#8212; allegedly in the arms &#8211; and the bed &#8211; of a young mistress / staffer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15456/comment-page-1#comment-76853</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 23:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15456#comment-76853</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I was sad that Teddy wasn&#039;t on the list either, but I guess he gets included for lots of other things, so you have to give the other guys a shot. 

Daniel, Johnson definitely bungled Reconstruction (puts it mildly). For example, he tried (and in many ways succeeded) in rolling back the push for civil rights for blacks at the end of the war. The amendments remained on the constitution, but it would be another century before meaningful civil rights would come to pass. Thanks, Andy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I was sad that Teddy wasn&#8217;t on the list either, but I guess he gets included for lots of other things, so you have to give the other guys a shot. </p>
<p>Daniel, Johnson definitely bungled Reconstruction (puts it mildly). For example, he tried (and in many ways succeeded) in rolling back the push for civil rights for blacks at the end of the war. The amendments remained on the constitution, but it would be another century before meaningful civil rights would come to pass. Thanks, Andy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
