<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Quick 10: The 10 Most Expensive Movies Ever</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15598/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15598</link>
	<description>Feel Smart Again</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 09:46:21 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ravi</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15598/comment-page-1#comment-226791</link>
		<dc:creator>ravi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15598#comment-226791</guid>
		<description>i think the new movie ...avatar by the titanic director will be the most expensive movie ever...what say?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think the new movie &#8230;avatar by the titanic director will be the most expensive movie ever&#8230;what say?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R_oSS</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15598/comment-page-1#comment-78452</link>
		<dc:creator>R_oSS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 23:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15598#comment-78452</guid>
		<description>Are we just counting US blockbusters,
because if not, Fritz Lang&#039;s Metropolis would have to be around $350.000.000 (cost 7 million reich mark in 1927) and be t 2nd place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are we just counting US blockbusters,<br />
because if not, Fritz Lang&#8217;s Metropolis would have to be around $350.000.000 (cost 7 million reich mark in 1927) and be t 2nd place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yasser</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15598/comment-page-1#comment-78005</link>
		<dc:creator>Yasser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 17:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15598#comment-78005</guid>
		<description>Interesting that some of the most expensive ones are relatively new. And people say Hollywood is having problems because of downloads...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting that some of the most expensive ones are relatively new. And people say Hollywood is having problems because of downloads&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hannah</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15598/comment-page-1#comment-77991</link>
		<dc:creator>hannah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15598#comment-77991</guid>
		<description>I liked Waterworld.

Compared with Terminator 3 and Xmen 3 it was genius.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked Waterworld.</p>
<p>Compared with Terminator 3 and Xmen 3 it was genius.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15598/comment-page-1#comment-77969</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 15:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15598#comment-77969</guid>
		<description>I think the sequels jack up the price not only because the audience is going to want bigger and better, they&#039;ll also want more of the same. So to secure the same stars/director/screenwriter, the asking price goes up for all parties. 

I think when Tobey Maguire signed on for Spider-Man 1, he also signed up for #2 at a comparatively low price. It took him faking (or over-emphasizing) a back injury to get up to an 8 digit salary and get the 9th most expensive movie ever made.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the sequels jack up the price not only because the audience is going to want bigger and better, they&#8217;ll also want more of the same. So to secure the same stars/director/screenwriter, the asking price goes up for all parties. </p>
<p>I think when Tobey Maguire signed on for Spider-Man 1, he also signed up for #2 at a comparatively low price. It took him faking (or over-emphasizing) a back injury to get up to an 8 digit salary and get the 9th most expensive movie ever made.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allison</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15598/comment-page-1#comment-77774</link>
		<dc:creator>Allison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 23:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15598#comment-77774</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s funny that such a number of these high-budget movies are sequals.  Guess it tells you something about the mentality of the movie industry. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s funny that such a number of these high-budget movies are sequals.  Guess it tells you something about the mentality of the movie industry. :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15598/comment-page-1#comment-77757</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 21:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15598#comment-77757</guid>
		<description>I think that the W&amp;P on the list refers to the Russian version, which came out in 1967 and was released in the US in 1968. It&#039;s about seven hours long and used 120,000 extras, so there&#039;s your money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that the W&amp;P on the list refers to the Russian version, which came out in 1967 and was released in the US in 1968. It&#8217;s about seven hours long and used 120,000 extras, so there&#8217;s your money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15598/comment-page-1#comment-77755</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 21:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15598#comment-77755</guid>
		<description>It would be interesting to see how much money each of those films has earned. I would bet at least a few of them haven&#039;t lived up to the cost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be interesting to see how much money each of those films has earned. I would bet at least a few of them haven&#8217;t lived up to the cost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EMStoveken</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15598/comment-page-1#comment-77745</link>
		<dc:creator>EMStoveken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 20:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15598#comment-77745</guid>
		<description>How much is Quantum of Solace budgeted for?  Sounds weird that a Bond movie would be cracking this list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How much is Quantum of Solace budgeted for?  Sounds weird that a Bond movie would be cracking this list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reed</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15598/comment-page-1#comment-77738</link>
		<dc:creator>Reed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 20:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/15598#comment-77738</guid>
		<description>Wasn&#039;t War and Peace released in 1956?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wasn&#8217;t War and Peace released in 1956?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
