<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Quick 10: 10 Things I Learned from the AP Stylebook</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/16354/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/16354</link>
	<description>Feel Smart Again</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun,  8 Nov 2009 17:20:56 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: tina</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/16354/comment-page-1#comment-83475</link>
		<dc:creator>tina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 20:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/16354#comment-83475</guid>
		<description>If voicemail is a compound word and mailbox is a compound word, do you write voicemailbox or voice mailbox or voicemail box?????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If voicemail is a compound word and mailbox is a compound word, do you write voicemailbox or voice mailbox or voicemail box?????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad Cloman</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/16354/comment-page-1#comment-82794</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad Cloman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 06:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/16354#comment-82794</guid>
		<description>@Debbie

I think it&#039;s because the words &quot;deaf and dumb&quot; have transformed and become put-downs. Much in the way that &quot;idiot&quot;, which was once a precise medical term has transformed into an insult.

I&#039;m not sure if it&#039;s the phrase &quot;deaf and dumb&quot; or both words individually that are prohibited, but &quot;dumb&quot; is no longer an appropriate way to describe someone who cannot speak.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Debbie</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s because the words &#8220;deaf and dumb&#8221; have transformed and become put-downs. Much in the way that &#8220;idiot&#8221;, which was once a precise medical term has transformed into an insult.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure if it&#8217;s the phrase &#8220;deaf and dumb&#8221; or both words individually that are prohibited, but &#8220;dumb&#8221; is no longer an appropriate way to describe someone who cannot speak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/16354/comment-page-1#comment-82670</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 18:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/16354#comment-82670</guid>
		<description>Waitaminnit, #7 doesn&#039;t make any sense.  The way it&#039;s worded here implies that you would write &quot;zeus&quot; instead of &quot;Zeus.&quot;  &quot;Zeus&quot; is a proper name, and thus gets a capital letter.  Perhaps the correct reading of the rule is that the word &quot;god&quot; gets a capital when referring to a monotheistic deity and not when referring to a polytheistic one?  So, &quot;The god Zeus hurls lightning,&quot; but &quot;God is great.&quot;

Coincidence check: for a comment relating to capitalizing (and thus giving more honor to) a monotheistic deity, the reCaptcha is &quot;this wafers.&quot;  My Catholic Mother would be amused!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Waitaminnit, #7 doesn&#8217;t make any sense.  The way it&#8217;s worded here implies that you would write &#8220;zeus&#8221; instead of &#8220;Zeus.&#8221;  &#8220;Zeus&#8221; is a proper name, and thus gets a capital letter.  Perhaps the correct reading of the rule is that the word &#8220;god&#8221; gets a capital when referring to a monotheistic deity and not when referring to a polytheistic one?  So, &#8220;The god Zeus hurls lightning,&#8221; but &#8220;God is great.&#8221;</p>
<p>Coincidence check: for a comment relating to capitalizing (and thus giving more honor to) a monotheistic deity, the reCaptcha is &#8220;this wafers.&#8221;  My Catholic Mother would be amused!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daphne</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/16354/comment-page-1#comment-82648</link>
		<dc:creator>Daphne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 17:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/16354#comment-82648</guid>
		<description>Thank you for this!  A friend of mine often calls me Satan while I, in kind, refer to him as the devil.  Today&#039;s 10 topic proves that I am of more importance to the world than my lowercase friend.  I&#039;ve already pointed this fact out to him in an appropriately capitalized email. ;P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this!  A friend of mine often calls me Satan while I, in kind, refer to him as the devil.  Today&#8217;s 10 topic proves that I am of more importance to the world than my lowercase friend.  I&#8217;ve already pointed this fact out to him in an appropriately capitalized email. ;P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lindsey</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/16354/comment-page-1#comment-82619</link>
		<dc:creator>Lindsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 16:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/16354#comment-82619</guid>
		<description>I forgot to mention that not every newspaper in the U.S. follows AP style. Many use it as a basis and add their own style rules as well. The New York Times use of &#039;Mr.&quot; and &quot;Ms.&quot; plus last name on all references after the first is an example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I forgot to mention that not every newspaper in the U.S. follows AP style. Many use it as a basis and add their own style rules as well. The New York Times use of &#8216;Mr.&#8221; and &#8220;Ms.&#8221; plus last name on all references after the first is an example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lindsey</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/16354/comment-page-1#comment-82617</link>
		<dc:creator>Lindsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 16:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/16354#comment-82617</guid>
		<description>Everyone needs to realize that the AP Stylebook was developed to simply be a standard for newspapers. Not only would grammar appear the same, but many of the rules also come from saving space in the paper, like the gentleman&#039;s comma.
It&#039;s not incorrect to say &quot;this, that, and the other.&quot; But AP would have you leave out the final comma in order to save space. It meant a lot when someone had to go through and place each letter individually on the press to print the paper.

My other favorite AP rule is farther versus further. Use &quot;farther&quot; to refer to a physical distance: &quot;The boy is farther away than the girl.&quot; User &quot;further&quot; to refer to something that exists in space in time: &quot;We are no further toward our savings goal than we were last year.&quot; (&quot;Toward&quot; without an &#039;s&#039; is also correct according to AP style.

I spent four years in Journalism school -- the AP Style Book was (and still is) my grammar bible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone needs to realize that the AP Stylebook was developed to simply be a standard for newspapers. Not only would grammar appear the same, but many of the rules also come from saving space in the paper, like the gentleman&#8217;s comma.<br />
It&#8217;s not incorrect to say &#8220;this, that, and the other.&#8221; But AP would have you leave out the final comma in order to save space. It meant a lot when someone had to go through and place each letter individually on the press to print the paper.</p>
<p>My other favorite AP rule is farther versus further. Use &#8220;farther&#8221; to refer to a physical distance: &#8220;The boy is farther away than the girl.&#8221; User &#8220;further&#8221; to refer to something that exists in space in time: &#8220;We are no further toward our savings goal than we were last year.&#8221; (&#8221;Toward&#8221; without an &#8217;s&#8217; is also correct according to AP style.</p>
<p>I spent four years in Journalism school &#8212; the AP Style Book was (and still is) my grammar bible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kate</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/16354/comment-page-1#comment-82584</link>
		<dc:creator>kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/16354#comment-82584</guid>
		<description>@michelle

Jesus is considered to be God, not *a* god, so Christianity is not considered polytheistic.  Christians &quot;just have God&quot; too (though I grant you, a slightly different view of Him.)

@David

I know it&#039;s the cool thing to do to bash the US&#039;s military/government, but capitalizing Army does not imply ownership of the term.  The &quot;United States Army&quot; is the proper name of an institution, just like, say, the &quot;University of Minnesota&quot; is a proper name, and does not imply that Minnesota thinks it owns the word &quot;university&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@michelle</p>
<p>Jesus is considered to be God, not *a* god, so Christianity is not considered polytheistic.  Christians &#8220;just have God&#8221; too (though I grant you, a slightly different view of Him.)</p>
<p>@David</p>
<p>I know it&#8217;s the cool thing to do to bash the US&#8217;s military/government, but capitalizing Army does not imply ownership of the term.  The &#8220;United States Army&#8221; is the proper name of an institution, just like, say, the &#8220;University of Minnesota&#8221; is a proper name, and does not imply that Minnesota thinks it owns the word &#8220;university&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Florida</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/16354/comment-page-1#comment-82578</link>
		<dc:creator>Florida</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 14:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/16354#comment-82578</guid>
		<description>Rules were meant to be broken.

reCaptcha: &quot;We Concombres&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rules were meant to be broken.</p>
<p>reCaptcha: &#8220;We Concombres&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debbie</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/16354/comment-page-1#comment-82563</link>
		<dc:creator>Debbie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 13:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/16354#comment-82563</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s wrong with &quot;deaf and dumb&quot; as a phrase? Do they explain?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s wrong with &#8220;deaf and dumb&#8221; as a phrase? Do they explain?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MaW</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/16354/comment-page-1#comment-82518</link>
		<dc:creator>MaW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 07:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/16354#comment-82518</guid>
		<description>David: Just what I was thinking. Over here it&#039;s just &#039;The Army&#039;. Actually, that&#039;s quite odd - we have a Royal Air Force and a Royal Navy, but the Army is just the Army (or sometimes the British Army), not the Royal Army. I wonder why they got left out when the Royals were being handed out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David: Just what I was thinking. Over here it&#8217;s just &#8216;The Army&#8217;. Actually, that&#8217;s quite odd &#8211; we have a Royal Air Force and a Royal Navy, but the Army is just the Army (or sometimes the British Army), not the Royal Army. I wonder why they got left out when the Royals were being handed out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
