mental_floss magazine
SUBSCRIBE >
GIFT SUBSCRIPTIONS >
DIGITAL SUBSCRIPTIONS >
subscriber services >
Editor’s Note: Yesterday, we put up a story from our archives about hero-worship of Rutherford B. Hayes in Paraguay. “Repost old articles about Rutherford B. Hayes” week continues with Jenny Drapkin’s look back at the election of 1876.

No matter what you think of the current political process, no election in American history is more shameful than the Hayes/Tilden election of 1876.
Even though the election of 1824 is known as the Corrupt Bargain, the most corrupt bargain of them all happened in 1876, when a fairly honest politician, Rutherford B. Hayes, compromised the fate of millions of freed slaves in a backroom deal to become president. How this came to pass after Hayes lost the popular vote by 3 percent and almost certainly lost the electoral vote was a categorical perversion of democracy.
But it was a strange time in America. The country was still healing from the Civil War, and Reconstruction had been going so poorly for so long that many Northerners no longer cared about rebuilding the South. The Republicans, a.k.a the Party of the Lincoln, had been in control of the White House for 16 years, thanks in part to the votes of black men below the Mason-Dixon line, who risked their lives by showing up at the polls. Lynching was on the rise, and only the presence of federal troops in the South kept the violence under control.
But the Republicans weren’t just a party of saints. They also stayed in power through a well-organized, corrupt party machine, which readily made cash and ballot boxes disappear. After a series of scandals, many voters wanted them out of office. And so in 1876, both the Republican candidate, Rutherford B. Hayes, and his opponent Samuel Tilden expected that Tilden—the Democrat—would win. In fact, as the sun set on the eve of the election, both men went to bed believing that Tilden had carried the day.
Little did they know that in middle of the night, party operatives would be busy making sure that every vote did not count. To be fair, the Democrats had henchmen of their own, but the Republicans were much more effective. In the weeks to come, fraud, bribery, and intimidation left the results of three states in question—Louisiana, South Carolina and Florida. If Hayes somehow managed to take all three states, he would win the presidency by one electoral vote.
Since there was no provision in the Constitution for a completely botched election, both state and federal governments started making up new rules as they went along. Eventually, Congress agreed that the election would be resolved in a 15-man committee, consisting of five Senators, five members of the House, and five Supreme Court Justices. At first, the deadlocked committee got nowhere, but then a backroom deal was struck: Southern Democrats would support Hayes for president if he agreed to withdraw federal troops from the South, ending Reconstruction and leaving African Americans to fend for themselves. Although Hayes acquiesced, he didn’t really win. He was a lame duck for his entire presidency and became known as “His Fraudulency” and Rutherfraud B. Hayes.”
But the biggest losers were ultimately African Americans in the South. The aftermath of the election gave rise to the Jim Crow laws, and so in a bitter twist of fate, Southern blacks became second-class citizens in order to keep the Party of Lincoln in power. It would take 90 years and one Civil Rights Movement to undo the events of 1876.
[This probably marks the end of "Repost old articles about Rutherford B. Hayes week." It's a short week.]
More from mental_floss…
A Brief History of Presidential Vacations
*
The Bizarre History of White House Pets
*
Presidential Siblings and the Headaches They Caused
*
7 Civil War Stories You Didn’t Learn in High School
*
How Cereal Transformed American Culture
*
Why Does Bottled Water Have An Expiration Date?
So glad that our politicians aren’t corrupt anymore, and that they don’t abuse black people.
Great post. I love hearing the history of our country that they don’t teach you in school.
posted by Pete on 7-23-2008 at 3:48 pm
I detect a trace of sarcasm in your comment Pete.
posted by kevin on 7-23-2008 at 5:37 pm
Pete,
Actually some of us do teach this kind of information in school.
(retired history teacher)
posted by Dennis M on 7-24-2008 at 5:10 am
As you can easily see, out political system has not evolved. I am pretty much ashamed of the two party monopoly that we are forced into. ( Here in Soviet America, the election falls on you! )
I should start a party just to collect the $83 million in hard earned taxpayers money offered for the campaign.
posted by bucsfan on 7-24-2008 at 7:26 am
Hey guys your election is still way too advance and honest as compared to ours here in the Philippines! Here, you can buy voters, you can buy leaders who want to lead and most of all, votes can be rigged. Its a sad plight here..
Sam
posted by Sam on 7-24-2008 at 8:37 am
great post, thanks!
posted by heather on 7-24-2008 at 11:19 am
another great article!
posted by kelly on 10-8-2008 at 2:54 pm
Great stuff!
posted by Hyacinth on 9-22-2009 at 4:18 pm
“It would take 90 years and one Civil Rights Movement to undo the events of 1876.”
Not to be too controversial here, but this should read more like “It will take more than a century and counting, untolled lives, a couple wars and a miracle to undo…”
Seriously, take a walk through Selma, Ala. In the black neighborhood (and there is a distinction) stands a statue of Nathan Bedford Forrest, father of the KKK. Or try Enterprise, Ala., where the boll weevil is honored in a statue rather than G. W. Carver, who made the peanut a viable crop after the weevils devastated the cotton industry.
The biggest change in some places (but not all, thank God,) is they had to take the “Whites Only” signs down, but the rules remain shamefully the same.
posted by Mike on 9-23-2009 at 9:40 am