<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brain Game: Don&#8217;t Squeeze Me!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/16798/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/16798</link>
	<description>Feel Smart Again</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 13:43:17 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matt R.</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/16798/comment-page-1#comment-164793</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 16:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/16798#comment-164793</guid>
		<description>I know it&#039;s been a year and nobody&#039;s reading, but I figured I&#039;d put my 2 cents in anyway. Temperature, Light, The Sun, Oxygen, and Moisture seem to fit the most, but none with certainty or without convoluted reasoning. &quot;No&quot; does not work because if the question is &quot;Can you solve the riddle?&quot; and &quot;No&quot; were the answer, then answering &quot;no&quot; would solve the riddle, thus undoing the answer. &quot;Yes&quot; is feebly viable, but returns you back to 169 (thank you, Hodge).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know it&#8217;s been a year and nobody&#8217;s reading, but I figured I&#8217;d put my 2 cents in anyway. Temperature, Light, The Sun, Oxygen, and Moisture seem to fit the most, but none with certainty or without convoluted reasoning. &#8220;No&#8221; does not work because if the question is &#8220;Can you solve the riddle?&#8221; and &#8220;No&#8221; were the answer, then answering &#8220;no&#8221; would solve the riddle, thus undoing the answer. &#8220;Yes&#8221; is feebly viable, but returns you back to 169 (thank you, Hodge).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/16798/comment-page-1#comment-89386</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 16:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/16798#comment-89386</guid>
		<description>I love how both the Onion and XKCD were mentioned (two of my favorite sites).
Any generic magic-eight-ball answer would, in some obscure fashion, be acceptable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love how both the Onion and XKCD were mentioned (two of my favorite sites).<br />
Any generic magic-eight-ball answer would, in some obscure fashion, be acceptable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stevw</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/16798/comment-page-1#comment-88360</link>
		<dc:creator>Stevw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 18:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/16798#comment-88360</guid>
		<description>The answer is No.

The question is &quot;CAN YOU SOLVE the riddle&quot; not &quot;WHAT IS THE ANSWER to the riddle&quot;

So either you can solve it or you cannot solve it and the answer is no.

There is no one thing that does all those things. Why do you suppose children can answer the question in less then 5 mins where well educated adults talk hours and discuss the riddle in forums. Children quite simply admit they cannot answer it where adults will look for the answer and not read the question</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The answer is No.</p>
<p>The question is &#8220;CAN YOU SOLVE the riddle&#8221; not &#8220;WHAT IS THE ANSWER to the riddle&#8221;</p>
<p>So either you can solve it or you cannot solve it and the answer is no.</p>
<p>There is no one thing that does all those things. Why do you suppose children can answer the question in less then 5 mins where well educated adults talk hours and discuss the riddle in forums. Children quite simply admit they cannot answer it where adults will look for the answer and not read the question</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alec</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/16798/comment-page-1#comment-86506</link>
		<dc:creator>Alec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 03:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/16798#comment-86506</guid>
		<description>The answer is yoursenses.
   It makes you see polar bears as white, it makes you feel sadness, it makes you digest food (and excrete it later), it makes girls subject to social stigmas based on appearance.
   It makes us see celebrities as who they really are and regular people as how special they really are, and lets you see the brownness of pancakes and taste the bubbles in champagne. If you hurt someone&#039;s &quot;feelings&quot;, I&#039;ll hurt, and if you look at them, deep inside of my SOUL, you&#039;ll die.
   I know, it doesn&#039;t always fit, but I like it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The answer is yoursenses.<br />
   It makes you see polar bears as white, it makes you feel sadness, it makes you digest food (and excrete it later), it makes girls subject to social stigmas based on appearance.<br />
   It makes us see celebrities as who they really are and regular people as how special they really are, and lets you see the brownness of pancakes and taste the bubbles in champagne. If you hurt someone&#8217;s &#8220;feelings&#8221;, I&#8217;ll hurt, and if you look at them, deep inside of my SOUL, you&#8217;ll die.<br />
   I know, it doesn&#8217;t always fit, but I like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/16798/comment-page-1#comment-85672</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 15:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/16798#comment-85672</guid>
		<description>the answer is &quot;you&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the answer is &#8220;you&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/16798/comment-page-1#comment-85650</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 12:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/16798#comment-85650</guid>
		<description>If the last line were not to be considered part of the riddle, as Joe suggests, then why is it so awkward? If the point of the riddle were simply to guess who the &quot;I&quot; was, the last line would be, &quot;Who am I?&quot; The unusual construction draws attention to itself and makes it part of the riddle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the last line were not to be considered part of the riddle, as Joe suggests, then why is it so awkward? If the point of the riddle were simply to guess who the &#8220;I&#8221; was, the last line would be, &#8220;Who am I?&#8221; The unusual construction draws attention to itself and makes it part of the riddle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/16798/comment-page-1#comment-85617</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 04:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/16798#comment-85617</guid>
		<description>The last line should be considered completely separate of the riddle itself. I don&#039;t mean to write this as a cop-out, but here&#039;s my reasoning out in the open:
After reading up to the second-to-last line, the riddle itself is over. The question at the end begins an entirely new thought. Considering the question elicits two possible answers - No, as in I cannot answer the riddle, and therefore would not attempt to do so, or Yes, as in I can in fact answer it. Answering the riddle would require a preemptive prompt such as &#039;What is the answer?&#039;, which of course is another line of thought.

In other words, &#039;What&#039;s the answer to this riddle?&#039; and &#039;Can you guess the riddle?&#039; are two completely isolated questions. Quite frankly, I cannot answer the riddle and would respond No to the last line, but someone who could answer it would answer Yes and move onto the next line of questioning posed by Sandy here.

By the way, I&#039;ve been drinking (and yes, I do focus more on my typing grammar when I have a buzz on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last line should be considered completely separate of the riddle itself. I don&#8217;t mean to write this as a cop-out, but here&#8217;s my reasoning out in the open:<br />
After reading up to the second-to-last line, the riddle itself is over. The question at the end begins an entirely new thought. Considering the question elicits two possible answers &#8211; No, as in I cannot answer the riddle, and therefore would not attempt to do so, or Yes, as in I can in fact answer it. Answering the riddle would require a preemptive prompt such as &#8216;What is the answer?&#8217;, which of course is another line of thought.</p>
<p>In other words, &#8216;What&#8217;s the answer to this riddle?&#8217; and &#8216;Can you guess the riddle?&#8217; are two completely isolated questions. Quite frankly, I cannot answer the riddle and would respond No to the last line, but someone who could answer it would answer Yes and move onto the next line of questioning posed by Sandy here.</p>
<p>By the way, I&#8217;ve been drinking (and yes, I do focus more on my typing grammar when I have a buzz on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LE</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/16798/comment-page-1#comment-85586</link>
		<dc:creator>LE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 01:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/16798#comment-85586</guid>
		<description>If the correct answer is &quot;no,&quot; then you just solved the riddle.  So wouldn&#039;t the answer be &quot;yes&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the correct answer is &#8220;no,&#8221; then you just solved the riddle.  So wouldn&#8217;t the answer be &#8220;yes&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tess</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/16798/comment-page-1#comment-85503</link>
		<dc:creator>tess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 19:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/16798#comment-85503</guid>
		<description>The sun...
The light from the sun reflects off the polar bears&#039; fur, making them white. 
The Sun magazine, I believe, is filled with celeb gossip.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sun&#8230;<br />
The light from the sun reflects off the polar bears&#8217; fur, making them white.<br />
The Sun magazine, I believe, is filled with celeb gossip.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/16798/comment-page-1#comment-85498</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 19:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/16798#comment-85498</guid>
		<description>How about &quot;Yes,&quot; because yes, I can guess, but I sure as hell won&#039;t be able to answer it correctly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about &#8220;Yes,&#8221; because yes, I can guess, but I sure as hell won&#8217;t be able to answer it correctly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
