mental_floss magazine
SUBSCRIBE >
GIFT SUBSCRIPTIONS >
DIGITAL SUBSCRIPTIONS >
subscriber services >
There are two kinds of people. Those who don’t take issue with this post’s title, and those now compelled to send me hate mail.
Five years ago, I had no idea the second camp existed. Setting out on a quest for grammar excellence, I had picked up a book called Woe Is I. Subtitled “The Grammarphobe’s Guide To Better English In Plain English,” it’s the work of Patricia T. O’Connor, who honed her skills as editor of The New York Times Book Review. This would be my grammar bible, O’Connor’s word gospel.
One lesson stood out – I’d been misusing hopefully all these years. I was bewildered. Like the time I found out jean shorts weren’t cool. In both cases, I had one question. When did this happen? In both cases, that question painted me even more clueless.
When I stumbled across a second edition last week, I noticed a startling reversal. Take a look.
Woe Is I, 1998 (paperback)
hopefully. By now it’s probably hopeless to resist the misuse of hopefully. Strictly speaking, there’s only one way to use it correctly – as an adverb meaning “in a hopeful manner.” In the time it takes you to read this sentence, hopefully will be misused at least once by every man, woman and child in the United States. Whether we like it or not – and I don’t – hopefully seems to be joining that class of introductory words that we use not to describe a verb, which is what adverbs usually do, but to describe our own attitude toward the statement that follows. Join the crowd and abuse hopefully if you want. I can’t stop you. But maybe if enough of us preserve the original meaning it can be saved. One can only hope.
Woe Is I, 2004 (paperback)
hopefully. These days, it’s hopeless to resist the evolution of hopefully. Purists used to insist (and some still do) that there’s only one way to use it correctly – as an adverb meaning “in a hopeful manner.” If the holdouts had their way, nobody would use hopefully to replace a phrase like “it is hoped” or “let us hope.” But here in the real world, language changes, and upright citizens have been using hopefully in that looser way for ages. It’s time to admit that hopefully has joined that class of introductory words (like fortunately, honestly, and others) that we use not to describe our attitude toward the statement that follows. The technical term for them in sentence adverbs. Be aware that some sticklers still take a narrow view of hopefully. Will they ever join the crowd? One can only hope.
O’Connor reminds me of an overwhelmed parent, giving up on curfew enforcement.
In my first month as a mental_floss blogger, I’ve been quite impressed by the grammatical prowess of our readers. So let me tap into your collective expertise. If you used hopefully the way I did in the title, would you be able to sleep?
Let us hope you can help.
This usage has become very common. Similar words and usage include “tragically,” “sadly,” etc. Sleep well.
posted by Nancy on 9-19-2006 at 5:55 pm
For another example of this, check out geoffrey pullum’s post “The Sexy British Press” at Language log
http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/003587.html#more
posted by Mudi-b on 9-19-2006 at 6:44 pm
Jean shorts aren’t cool? Since when? Hopefully, they’ll come back in style.
I’ll sleep just fine tonight, thank you very much. ;o)
posted by Dave on 9-19-2006 at 8:12 pm
Keep up the good fight! Perhaps you can also help educate the world about the difference between it’s and its. I love reading high-end ads created by people who apparently missed school the day it’s/its were discussed.
posted by James on 9-20-2006 at 8:14 am
“It’s time to admit that hopefully has joined that class of introductory words (like fortunately, honestly, and others) that we use not to describe our attitude toward the statement that follows.”
So do we or do we not, use the word to describe our attitude? Inquiring minds want to know.
posted by KJ on 9-20-2006 at 9:04 am
James, if you’re going to go down the its/it’s road, you must also travel the their/there/they’re road and the your/you’re road.
posted by Susan on 9-20-2006 at 9:35 am
Now, I’m all for the “its/it’s” and “your/you’re” distinction (I once spotted someone using “your’e”. Some people are beyond help.), but I have to cry Common Use here. Starting a sentence with “hopefully” makes perfect sense in context and causes no ambiguous meanings. So I say change the rule, not the usage.
P.S.: I also think the word “whom” is archaic and should be stricken from the language. Who’s with me?
posted by Lucres on 9-20-2006 at 12:39 pm
This settles it. Never again will I hold back a sentence adverb, in fear of disdain.
I might even break out the jean shorts again.
posted by Jason on 9-20-2006 at 12:49 pm
Language will evolve — that’s a given. What’s important is that the content is communicated accurately to the audience, irregardless of which words are used.
posted by Ron on 9-20-2006 at 1:01 pm
“There are words that are so stretched out of shape that they aren’t even words anymore – like that impostor irregardless.”
-Woe is I
posted by The Grammar Police on 9-20-2006 at 2:18 pm