<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hopefully, I can get a ruling.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/1773/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/1773</link>
	<description>Feel Smart Again</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:09:04 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Grammar Police</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/1773/comment-page-1#comment-2027</link>
		<dc:creator>The Grammar Police</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 18:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/1773#comment-2027</guid>
		<description>&quot;There are words that are so stretched out of shape that they aren&#039;t even words anymore – like that impostor irregardless.&quot;

-Woe is I</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There are words that are so stretched out of shape that they aren&#8217;t even words anymore – like that impostor irregardless.&#8221;</p>
<p>-Woe is I</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/1773/comment-page-1#comment-2021</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 17:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/1773#comment-2021</guid>
		<description>Language will evolve -- that&#039;s a given.  What&#039;s important is that the content is communicated accurately to the audience, irregardless of which words are used.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Language will evolve &#8212; that&#8217;s a given.  What&#8217;s important is that the content is communicated accurately to the audience, irregardless of which words are used.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/1773/comment-page-1#comment-2014</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 16:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/1773#comment-2014</guid>
		<description>This settles it.  Never again will I hold back a sentence adverb, in fear of disdain.  

I might even break out the jean shorts again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This settles it.  Never again will I hold back a sentence adverb, in fear of disdain.  </p>
<p>I might even break out the jean shorts again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucres</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/1773/comment-page-1#comment-2013</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucres</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 16:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/1773#comment-2013</guid>
		<description>Now, I&#039;m all for the &quot;its/it&#039;s&quot; and &quot;your/you&#039;re&quot; distinction (I once spotted someone using &quot;your&#039;e&quot;.  Some people are beyond help.), but I have to cry Common Use here.  Starting a sentence with &quot;hopefully&quot; makes perfect sense in context and causes no ambiguous meanings. So I say change the rule, not the usage.

P.S.: I also think the word &quot;whom&quot; is archaic and should be stricken from the language. Who&#039;s with me?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now, I&#8217;m all for the &#8220;its/it&#8217;s&#8221; and &#8220;your/you&#8217;re&#8221; distinction (I once spotted someone using &#8220;your&#8217;e&#8221;.  Some people are beyond help.), but I have to cry Common Use here.  Starting a sentence with &#8220;hopefully&#8221; makes perfect sense in context and causes no ambiguous meanings. So I say change the rule, not the usage.</p>
<p>P.S.: I also think the word &#8220;whom&#8221; is archaic and should be stricken from the language. Who&#8217;s with me?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/1773/comment-page-1#comment-2004</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 13:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/1773#comment-2004</guid>
		<description>James, if you&#039;re going to go down the its/it&#039;s road, you must also travel the their/there/they&#039;re road and the your/you&#039;re road.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James, if you&#8217;re going to go down the its/it&#8217;s road, you must also travel the their/there/they&#8217;re road and the your/you&#8217;re road.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KJ</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/1773/comment-page-1#comment-2003</link>
		<dc:creator>KJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 13:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/1773#comment-2003</guid>
		<description>&quot;It’s time to admit that hopefully has joined that class of introductory words (like fortunately, honestly, and others) that we use not to describe our attitude toward the statement that follows.&quot;

So do we or do we not, use the word to describe our attitude? Inquiring minds want to know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It’s time to admit that hopefully has joined that class of introductory words (like fortunately, honestly, and others) that we use not to describe our attitude toward the statement that follows.&#8221;</p>
<p>So do we or do we not, use the word to describe our attitude? Inquiring minds want to know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/1773/comment-page-1#comment-1997</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 12:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/1773#comment-1997</guid>
		<description>Keep up the good fight!  Perhaps you can also help educate the world about the difference between it&#039;s and its.  I love reading high-end ads created by people who apparently missed school the day it&#039;s/its were discussed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep up the good fight!  Perhaps you can also help educate the world about the difference between it&#8217;s and its.  I love reading high-end ads created by people who apparently missed school the day it&#8217;s/its were discussed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/1773/comment-page-1#comment-1979</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 00:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/1773#comment-1979</guid>
		<description>Jean shorts aren&#039;t cool? Since when? Hopefully, they&#039;ll come back in style. 

I&#039;ll sleep just fine tonight, thank you very much. ;o)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jean shorts aren&#8217;t cool? Since when? Hopefully, they&#8217;ll come back in style. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll sleep just fine tonight, thank you very much. ;o)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mudi-b</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/1773/comment-page-1#comment-1977</link>
		<dc:creator>Mudi-b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 22:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/1773#comment-1977</guid>
		<description>For another example of this, check out geoffrey pullum&#039;s post &quot;The Sexy British Press&quot; at Language log
http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/003587.html#more</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For another example of this, check out geoffrey pullum&#8217;s post &#8220;The Sexy British Press&#8221; at Language log<br />
<a href="http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/003587.html#more" rel="nofollow">http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/003587.html#more</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/1773/comment-page-1#comment-1974</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 21:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/1773#comment-1974</guid>
		<description>This usage has become very common.  Similar words and usage include &quot;tragically,&quot; &quot;sadly,&quot; etc.  Sleep well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This usage has become very common.  Similar words and usage include &#8220;tragically,&#8221; &#8220;sadly,&#8221; etc.  Sleep well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
