<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brain Game: The Good Old Days</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/17754/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/17754</link>
	<description>Feel Smart Again</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 13:43:17 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PartiallyDeflected</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/17754/comment-page-1#comment-91881</link>
		<dc:creator>PartiallyDeflected</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 03:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/17754#comment-91881</guid>
		<description>Perrry&#039;s Place burned down it 1954.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perrry&#8217;s Place burned down it 1954.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/17754/comment-page-1#comment-91750</link>
		<dc:creator>M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/17754#comment-91750</guid>
		<description>Sure, you can nitpick the car -- but I got two other things that were more obvious:
1. If it&#039;s his 50th anniversary and they dated in &#039;56, might it really be his 51st or 52nd anniversary?
2. More to the point, what old geezer really talks about &quot;getting busy&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, you can nitpick the car &#8212; but I got two other things that were more obvious:<br />
1. If it&#8217;s his 50th anniversary and they dated in &#8216;56, might it really be his 51st or 52nd anniversary?<br />
2. More to the point, what old geezer really talks about &#8220;getting busy&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: evh</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/17754/comment-page-1#comment-91627</link>
		<dc:creator>evh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 17:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/17754#comment-91627</guid>
		<description>the fib lies in the old man&#039;s existence itself.  because anyone who uses the unfathomably lame &#039;getting busy&#039; instantly forfeits his or her right to exist in this universe.

at least to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the fib lies in the old man&#8217;s existence itself.  because anyone who uses the unfathomably lame &#8216;getting busy&#8217; instantly forfeits his or her right to exist in this universe.</p>
<p>at least to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/17754/comment-page-1#comment-91626</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 17:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/17754#comment-91626</guid>
		<description>Well, it&#039;s quite obvious that he&#039;s lying:

He&#039;s not real. We&#039;re just pretending that he is. As a mere logical construct, it is impossible for him to have actually existed in the 50&#039;s, let alone to have actually partaken in the activities he claims.

;) How&#039;s that for usin&#039; yer noggin?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it&#8217;s quite obvious that he&#8217;s lying:</p>
<p>He&#8217;s not real. We&#8217;re just pretending that he is. As a mere logical construct, it is impossible for him to have actually existed in the 50&#8217;s, let alone to have actually partaken in the activities he claims.</p>
<p>;) How&#8217;s that for usin&#8217; yer noggin?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SDK</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/17754/comment-page-1#comment-91608</link>
		<dc:creator>SDK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 17:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/17754#comment-91608</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t read the other posts yet -wanted to get my answer out untainted.

The TB didn&#039;t have a back seat until 1958. It was a 2 seater so no &quot;getting busy in the back seat&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t read the other posts yet -wanted to get my answer out untainted.</p>
<p>The TB didn&#8217;t have a back seat until 1958. It was a 2 seater so no &#8220;getting busy in the back seat&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sue</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/17754/comment-page-1#comment-91522</link>
		<dc:creator>Sue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 15:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/17754#comment-91522</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been in a &#039;56 T-bird.  There was no back seat.  Not sure what year his car was, but would have to assume it was built the same way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been in a &#8216;56 T-bird.  There was no back seat.  Not sure what year his car was, but would have to assume it was built the same way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/17754/comment-page-1#comment-91517</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 15:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/17754#comment-91517</guid>
		<description>I figured this would be an anachronism question, so I hopped over to Wikipedia to check out when the Firebird was made... drat, the first model was 1955!... I was about to navigate away when I noticed how short it looked and realized the no backseat thing.

However, I do like the more logic based ones... or insanely small crosswords.

Recaptcha: Custard Courtyard... now I&#039;m hungry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I figured this would be an anachronism question, so I hopped over to Wikipedia to check out when the Firebird was made&#8230; drat, the first model was 1955!&#8230; I was about to navigate away when I noticed how short it looked and realized the no backseat thing.</p>
<p>However, I do like the more logic based ones&#8230; or insanely small crosswords.</p>
<p>Recaptcha: Custard Courtyard&#8230; now I&#8217;m hungry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaviMack</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/17754/comment-page-1#comment-91490</link>
		<dc:creator>DaviMack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 13:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/17754#comment-91490</guid>
		<description>Have we moved away from logic and into Trivial Pursuit, then?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have we moved away from logic and into Trivial Pursuit, then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daryl Campbell</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/17754/comment-page-1#comment-91486</link>
		<dc:creator>Daryl Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 13:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/17754#comment-91486</guid>
		<description>A double feature at the drive-in would start when the sun went down and it was sufficiently dark...putting them home(if they stayed for both features)closer to 12:30 than 11:00.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A double feature at the drive-in would start when the sun went down and it was sufficiently dark&#8230;putting them home(if they stayed for both features)closer to 12:30 than 11:00.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Qui</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/17754/comment-page-1#comment-91485</link>
		<dc:creator>Qui</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 13:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/17754#comment-91485</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s because they didn&#039;t have &quot;Friday&quot; in 1956 - that was invented in 1959 to confuse the commies. Duh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s because they didn&#8217;t have &#8220;Friday&#8221; in 1956 &#8211; that was invented in 1959 to confuse the commies. Duh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
