mental_floss magazine
SUBSCRIBE >
GIFT SUBSCRIPTIONS >
DIGITAL SUBSCRIPTIONS >
subscriber services >
Apparently, rough economic times causes a decrease in the birth of males. Research shows that in times of war and environmental disaster, the sex ratio, which is typically half boys and half girls, gets disrupted. Because of economic stress, women are more likely to go into labor prematurely. Further, since male fetuses are more likely to be miscarried than female, more male babies don’t survive the pregnancy and premature labor. The stress also affects the male reproductive system, slowing down sperm motility. Normally, the faster swimming sperm (XY) create the male babies, but under stress, not as many male producing sperm are able to reach the egg.
Higher unemployment seems to make us healthier. At least, that’s what Christopher J. Ruhm, a professor of economics at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro, is saying. After years of studying health and economic shifts of the 23 developed nations in the OECD, he came to some startling conclusions. Most notably, that a rise in unemployment of one percentage point would predict the 2,900 fewer deaths among young adults and 4,900 fewer deaths among seniors. Despite prior research that claims that poverty and unemployment lead to poor health, his study found that a bad economy may actually be good for our health.
How so? Ruhm looked at CDC data from 1987 to 2000 and found that “smoking, height-adjusted weight, and leisure-time physical inactivity decline when economic conditions worsen.” Essentially, the unemployed have less money to buy cigarettes or to drink. The unemployed also have more time to exercise. Ruhm found that 1 percentage drop in unemployment was associated with a 0.75% rise in heart attacks. Because people also drive less, the number of car accidents decreases. In fact, if 1% more people have jobs, the number of traffic accidents increases by 2.1%.
Read more of Diana’s terrific posts, here.
My stepdad has taken up smoking again because of “stress” dealing with money issues since his job cut his hours. So it seems people would become MORE unhealthy before losing their jobs completely and no longer having any money to buy cigs and alcohol.
posted by Sawicki on 8-28-2008 at 1:27 pm
The hyperlinked word “research” and the phrase “studying health and economic shifts” are totally not working for me. I don’t know if it’s just me, but nothing happens when I click on them. I’m not having any such problem in any other article.
posted by August on 8-28-2008 at 3:39 pm
Diana, I find this, if true, to be totally counter-intuitive. You would think that high stress would result in a higher mortality rate to both the born and the unborn, but I guess not having to work can be stress relieving. Thanks for the thought of the day.
posted by Joe Manausa on 8-28-2008 at 3:40 pm
Normal sperm only carry one chromosome, an X or a Y. The sperm containing the Y would be faster because the Y chromosome is smaller than the X chromosome. And I go to mental floss to learn new things…
posted by Katie on 8-28-2008 at 11:37 pm
Normal sperm only carry one chromosome, an X or a Y. The Y chromosome is smaller than the X, making a Y-carrying sperm lighter than and X-carrying sperm, therefore making the Y-carrier faster.
posted by Katie on 8-28-2008 at 11:40 pm