<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who&#8217;s Next? A Look at Presidential Succession</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/18484/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/18484</link>
	<description>Feel Smart Again</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 14:20:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: H</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/18484/comment-page-1#comment-470968</link>
		<dc:creator>H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 19:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/18484#comment-470968</guid>
		<description>The lesson here? Never pick anyone named Johnson to be your vice-president.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The lesson here? Never pick anyone named Johnson to be your vice-president.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveP</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/18484/comment-page-1#comment-470901</link>
		<dc:creator>DaveP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 15:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/18484#comment-470901</guid>
		<description>I remember watching a clip from Mo Udall&#039;s confirmation hearing where he was talking about this. It was something like he told he son he would be 11th in line for the presidency. His son&#039;s response was &quot;that&#039;s closer than you got when you were running for it&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember watching a clip from Mo Udall&#8217;s confirmation hearing where he was talking about this. It was something like he told he son he would be 11th in line for the presidency. His son&#8217;s response was &#8220;that&#8217;s closer than you got when you were running for it&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cyclon pro tem</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/18484/comment-page-1#comment-105750</link>
		<dc:creator>cyclon pro tem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 05:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/18484#comment-105750</guid>
		<description>&quot;Is whatâ€™s listed the entire line? I ask because the 12 Colonies apparently have a longer line . . . Laura Roslin was 47th in line, I believe (or some ridiculously large number like that). At least we know that lineage thing works . . . at least in science fiction.&quot;

If we assume that each colony had a president, vp, cabinet, etc...  each planet would have at least 4 to 12 int he line.  If the president of the colonies dies, the VP, would assume, and once they run out of officers in the Colonies, then I would assume that the presidents of the individual colonies would be in line, followed by the VP, etc...  So in reality, 47 seems kinda high for Roslyn, probably should be closer to 156th in line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Is whatâ€™s listed the entire line? I ask because the 12 Colonies apparently have a longer line . . . Laura Roslin was 47th in line, I believe (or some ridiculously large number like that). At least we know that lineage thing works . . . at least in science fiction.&#8221;</p>
<p>If we assume that each colony had a president, vp, cabinet, etc&#8230;  each planet would have at least 4 to 12 int he line.  If the president of the colonies dies, the VP, would assume, and once they run out of officers in the Colonies, then I would assume that the presidents of the individual colonies would be in line, followed by the VP, etc&#8230;  So in reality, 47 seems kinda high for Roslyn, probably should be closer to 156th in line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maz2331</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/18484/comment-page-1#comment-98163</link>
		<dc:creator>Maz2331</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 18:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/18484#comment-98163</guid>
		<description>Always good to know how this one works!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Always good to know how this one works!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/18484/comment-page-1#comment-98161</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 18:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/18484#comment-98161</guid>
		<description>this is a test</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is a test</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/18484/comment-page-1#comment-97843</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/18484#comment-97843</guid>
		<description>I also agree that &quot;Designated Survivor&quot; is the coolest term I&#039;ve ever read. 

Does anyone know if that is the official term or if Mr. Soniak made it up. Either way, it is still cool!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also agree that &#8220;Designated Survivor&#8221; is the coolest term I&#8217;ve ever read. </p>
<p>Does anyone know if that is the official term or if Mr. Soniak made it up. Either way, it is still cool!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gretchen</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/18484/comment-page-1#comment-97816</link>
		<dc:creator>Gretchen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 14:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/18484#comment-97816</guid>
		<description>10 years limitation is designed so that if the VP (or anyone else in the line of succession) becomes president, they may run for 2 full terms if they serve less than half of the term they take over. So in that example, he would be ineligible to run a second time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>10 years limitation is designed so that if the VP (or anyone else in the line of succession) becomes president, they may run for 2 full terms if they serve less than half of the term they take over. So in that example, he would be ineligible to run a second time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KJ</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/18484/comment-page-1#comment-97810</link>
		<dc:creator>KJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 13:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/18484#comment-97810</guid>
		<description>In a quiz on the Constitution in the newspaper, it says that a President can serve a maximum of 10 years. 

So my question is this: 
Suppose Pres X dies in the first month of office and the VP Y becomes president and serves out the term of 3 years, 11 months.  Then he goes on to win two elections.  Do we have to have a special election in the middle of his 2nd term? Or is he ineligable to run a 2nd time? 

I don&#039;t understand the 10 years limitation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a quiz on the Constitution in the newspaper, it says that a President can serve a maximum of 10 years. </p>
<p>So my question is this:<br />
Suppose Pres X dies in the first month of office and the VP Y becomes president and serves out the term of 3 years, 11 months.  Then he goes on to win two elections.  Do we have to have a special election in the middle of his 2nd term? Or is he ineligable to run a 2nd time? </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t understand the 10 years limitation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pc</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/18484/comment-page-1#comment-97771</link>
		<dc:creator>pc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 06:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/18484#comment-97771</guid>
		<description>&quot;Sprio&quot; should be Spiro Agnew.  

I only know Agnew as the headless body of Agnew, from Futurama.  Aroo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Sprio&#8221; should be Spiro Agnew.  </p>
<p>I only know Agnew as the headless body of Agnew, from Futurama.  Aroo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leslie</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/18484/comment-page-1#comment-97734</link>
		<dc:creator>leslie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 22:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/18484#comment-97734</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s the size of every list I&#039;ve seen. I teach Govt, so I have all kinds of useless/interesting trivia like that lying around.
Right now I&#039;m checking on that prez-elect question. I believe that if the electoral college has met (Dec 16) then the elected VP would take over, since the vote has been cast and confirmed. If he died between Nov 5 and Dec 16, I don&#039;t know what would happen. The electors MUST meet in December, and THAT is the official vote, not the one in November.

 So, maybe the electors would be able to vote for whomever... they are always  chosen from the winning party, but some states do not have laws requiring electors to vote the way the state voted, and the Constitution doesn&#039;t require it, either...things could get pretty weird.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s the size of every list I&#8217;ve seen. I teach Govt, so I have all kinds of useless/interesting trivia like that lying around.<br />
Right now I&#8217;m checking on that prez-elect question. I believe that if the electoral college has met (Dec 16) then the elected VP would take over, since the vote has been cast and confirmed. If he died between Nov 5 and Dec 16, I don&#8217;t know what would happen. The electors MUST meet in December, and THAT is the official vote, not the one in November.</p>
<p> So, maybe the electors would be able to vote for whomever&#8230; they are always  chosen from the winning party, but some states do not have laws requiring electors to vote the way the state voted, and the Constitution doesn&#8217;t require it, either&#8230;things could get pretty weird.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

