Where Knowledge Junkies Get Their Fix
McAfee Secure sites help keep you safe from identity theft, credit card fraud, spyware, spam, viruses and online scams
Diana Wolf
How to Sell Short (And Why? And When?)
by Diana Wolf - September 24, 2008 - 10:47 AM

Perhaps you’ve read about the ban on short selling. Many believe it is one of the main causes of the current financial crisis and the fall of Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers, and AIG. But what exactly is “short selling”? How and when can you do it? And why is it so frowned upon?

monopoly-man.jpgWhen to sell short. You sell short when you think that a certain stock price is going to fall, and you’d like to profit from that premonition.

How to sell short. Say you know something about a certain stock that nobody else does. Let’s use Apple. You were a tester for the new iPhone, which you found malfunctioned. You know that upon release of the phone tomorrow, Apple’s stock price will fall. You want to profit off of this, but you don’t own any AAPL shares. Or you do, but not as many as you’d like.

So you borrow AAPL stock from someone else’s account. Let’s call him Joe. Your broker can help you do this – take 100 AAPL shares out of his client, Joe’s, account (without Joe knowing about it) and give them to you. You sell those 100 shares at $140.90 each, today’s share price. The next day the new iPhone comes out, it bombs, and as you thought, shares fall to $100. (Dramatic, yes, but go with it). The next week, you think Apple’s share price will rise, so you buy back those 100 shares at $100 and give them back to Joe’s account. You’ve just made a sweet $4,090 in profit. To sum it up: you borrow shares of stock from someone else’s account. Sell them. Then buy them back at a (hopefully) lower price and return them to the account from which you borrowed.

Why sell short? One reason, as described above, is to speculate. If you think a stock or the market as a whole is overpriced, you can make money off of it. A second reason is to hedge – to protect yourself from unexpected losses. That is, if you’re long AAPL but want to take a little less risk, you might want to short another security in the computer industry, which includes risk inherent to Apple.

You probably shouldn’t sell short. Now I’m not recommending you actually do this, unless you are well versed in the markets. It’s pretty risky. If Joe decides he wants to do something with these shares, he can call you on it. At that moment you’ll have to cover, which means you’ll have to buy back the shares you borrowed from him and put them back into his account. So – say AAPL price actually rose and you were called when it was $160.90. Then you would have lost $2,000.

Even if you want to, right now you can’t. I also don’t recommend you do this, because right now you can’t. The SEC just put a ban on short-selling. After allegations that short sellers have led to the failures of Lehman, Bear, and the like, the SEC stepped in last Thursday and issued a temporary ban on short selling for 799 financial stocks. It’s alleged that short sellers often use false information and conspire to drive down the price of the stock.

This isn’t the first time we’ve placed a ban on short sellers. Short sellers were blamed for the Wall Street crash of 1929. Congress reacted by enacting a law, referred to as the “uptick rule,” which banned sellers from shorting during a downturn. Sellers could not short a share when the stock was selling for lower than the previous trade. This kept short sellers from adding downward momentum of a stock when it was already sharply declining. After almost 80 years, the ban was lifted in 2007, when the SEC determined the markets were orderly enough that they didn’t need the restriction (this is despite the fact that just two years prior in 2005, the SEC sought to restrict short-selling outright).

The history of short-selling takes us back earlier than the Great Depression, however. In 1609, Isaac Le Maire, a Dutch trader, made the first short. He was concerned about threats of attack by English ships and shorted shares of the Dutch East India Company, the first multinational corporation and the first company to issue stock. The Dutch stock exchange did not approve of Le Maire’s actions and temporarily banned short-selling.

Later, during the Dutch depression of the 1630s, speculators saw short-selling as a means to profit off of the economic downturn. The English reacted by banning short-selling completely.

Be sure to read more of what Diana learned today here.

Comments (8)
  1. Another reason not to recommend doing this: Under the scenario you give (”Say you know something about a certain stock that nobody else does”) shorting the stock is insider trading under the law and completely illegal. Just selling stock you already own under those conditions is illegal.

  2. While you’re at it, why not post some tips on how to make a pipe bomb?

  3. I am amazed that it’s illegal to do “inside trading” (to buy sell stock based on inside knowledge about the stock), but futures and hedging don’t have this requirement.

    How is this any different? Both are a conflict of interest and just promote stock holders forcing prices in their favor.

  4. I can’t believe you are able to “borrow” stock from another persons account without them knowing about it. Is it not logical to think that unless you personally own the stock you should be able to do anything with it? If you want to try to short sell, go out and buy your own shares to play with.

  5. There are two things to understand here. First is naked shorting where one hasn’t actually borrowed the shares yet. Now against the rules.

    The second is while there is tremendous value IMO to the uptick rule, the move to decimals made it very difficult to track. When the spread (the difference between the bid price and the ask price) was permitted to go to a penny from its prior minimum of a nickle, it became more difficult to determine ticks, especially when tens or hundreds of millions of shares trade.

    That’s not to say we can’t enforce the uptick rule. I personally like it and believe in the need to allow shorting. But it becomes harder to define clearly in a fast paced, $0.01 market.

  6. Thanks for this article! I have to understand short selling for a current events test on Friday and our teacher did a horrible job explaining it, but I hadn’t found another source that explained. (not that I looked very hard. The class requires a level of effort I am not willing to put forth, but the teacher did not clue us into that until after the drop date)

  7. The bit I don’t understand is how do you ‘borrow’ Joe’s shares without him knowing? Isn’t this actually stealing?

  8. If we outlaw short selling, how will Eddie Murphy and Dan Aykroyd get back at the Duke brothers?

Comment

commenting policy