Inspired by David’s (admittedly bizarre) claim that Missouri is “the” place to live, I decided to get to the bottom of this. Heading straight for Bert Sperling’s popular bestplaces.net, I quickly discovered that the “best city” title is a hotly-contended one: there are at least eight U.S. metropoli vying for the honor — and none of them are in Missouri. Satisfied that such subjective rankings will leave cities like jogger-friendly Portland, OR, Southern charmer Charlottesville, VA and spickety-span Fort Collins, CO (Money magazine’s 2006 top city) duking it out for decades to come, I gravitated toward the weirder rankings. For instance:
- Birmingham, AL: the home of mental_floss, and also the city in which you are 2nd most likely to develop a respiratory infection. #1 was Nashville; in fact, 8 of the top 10 cities are in the South. (This study doesn’t discuss contributing factors — anyone care to hazard a guess?)
- Boston, MA: hardest city to navigate. Factoring in one-way streets, bodies of water, congested freeways and days per year when snow exceeded 1.5 inches, Boston took the cake. Can you dig it?
- Detroit, MI: worst place to get a good night’s sleep. A recent study found a link between high unemployment and sleepless nights, putting the Motor City way ahead of New York — the “city that never sleeps” — at #6.
- Cincinnati, OH is the city in which you’re most likely to develop a migraine headache. Big triggers include rapidly-changing weather and a high rate of red wine consumption.
- Kansas City, MO: toughest place to get a date. A lack of date-friendly hangouts like coffee shops, bars and bowling alleys (always my preferred lady-wowing venue), combined with a lack of eligible singles 18-24 make Kansas City the city least likely to help you get your freak on.
- The people of Las Vegas, NV have the highest rate of resistance to antibiotics. And if you need more information to explain that one, it’s time you left Kansas City.
Hello from Tuscaloosa! Thanks for the laugh, esp in the last one.
posted by Cajun 2 Core on 9-28-2006 at 11:09 am
What about Moorestown, NJ? No metropolis, but isn’t it supposed to be high up there?
posted by David on 9-28-2006 at 11:44 am
Nashville is, indeed, a hotbed of allergens. One contributing factor is that we are in the Cumberland Basin, a lower level surrounded by hills, which keeps the wind from blowing those pesky pollens off to Knoxville.
posted by CB on 9-28-2006 at 1:34 pm
Contributing factors for allergens would include prevailing winds, humidity, and which pollen-producing plants grow there. Also how many of those plants are there. The percentage of people who smoke or are ontherwise unhealthy would factor in, because they suffer more when allergies strike.
posted by Miss Cellania on 9-30-2006 at 6:10 am