<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: URLs with incorrect grammar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/22125/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/22125</link>
	<description>Feel Smart Again</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 10:01:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/22125/comment-page-1#comment-124503</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 01:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/22125#comment-124503</guid>
		<description>it really should be &quot;trooper&quot; for just on soldier instead of &quot;troops&quot;. So for example, 100,000 troops x 30 troopers in each unit would be a lot more than 100,000 &quot;troops&quot;!

Liz: that reminds me of www.penisland.net

bwahahaha!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it really should be &#8220;trooper&#8221; for just on soldier instead of &#8220;troops&#8221;. So for example, 100,000 troops x 30 troopers in each unit would be a lot more than 100,000 &#8220;troops&#8221;!</p>
<p>Liz: that reminds me of <a href="http://www.penisland.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.penisland.net</a></p>
<p>bwahahaha!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hillary</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/22125/comment-page-1#comment-123209</link>
		<dc:creator>Hillary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 02:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/22125#comment-123209</guid>
		<description>David K. Israel,

Your welcome! Its my pleasure.

; )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David K. Israel,</p>
<p>Your welcome! Its my pleasure.</p>
<p>; )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emilimily</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/22125/comment-page-1#comment-123105</link>
		<dc:creator>Emilimily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/22125#comment-123105</guid>
		<description>Grammar does not equal spelling, nor does incorrect grammar mean less-than-awesome word choice, such as &quot;stuff&quot;.  It&#039;s a perfectly good, if informal and imprecise, word and is used correctly in &quot;stuff white people like&quot;.
Strunk &amp; White are your humorous uncle with the good advice, not your drill sergeant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grammar does not equal spelling, nor does incorrect grammar mean less-than-awesome word choice, such as &#8220;stuff&#8221;.  It&#8217;s a perfectly good, if informal and imprecise, word and is used correctly in &#8220;stuff white people like&#8221;.<br />
Strunk &amp; White are your humorous uncle with the good advice, not your drill sergeant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bajakirch</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/22125/comment-page-1#comment-123016</link>
		<dc:creator>bajakirch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 22:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/22125#comment-123016</guid>
		<description>Ah, I feel your collective pain.

While I can&#039;t think of websites that peeve my grammatical senses, I&#039;ve been tilting at a windmill regarding my local high school&#039;s nickname. They are the &#039;Vanguards&#039;. My issue is that &#039;vanguard&#039; is already plural (much like the troop argument above). Vanguard = a group of soldiers. So when I&#039;m cheering on the football team, I shouldn&#039;t be yelling &quot;Go Vanguards!&quot;, it should be &quot;Go Vanguard!&quot;. 

Of course, I live down the road from Lands&#039; End, so maybe it&#039;s in the water.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, I feel your collective pain.</p>
<p>While I can&#8217;t think of websites that peeve my grammatical senses, I&#8217;ve been tilting at a windmill regarding my local high school&#8217;s nickname. They are the &#8216;Vanguards&#8217;. My issue is that &#8216;vanguard&#8217; is already plural (much like the troop argument above). Vanguard = a group of soldiers. So when I&#8217;m cheering on the football team, I shouldn&#8217;t be yelling &#8220;Go Vanguards!&#8221;, it should be &#8220;Go Vanguard!&#8221;. </p>
<p>Of course, I live down the road from Lands&#8217; End, so maybe it&#8217;s in the water.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/22125/comment-page-1#comment-123002</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 21:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/22125#comment-123002</guid>
		<description>Stephanie,

Obviously, if you believe that the only word you can use correctly is &quot;y&#039;all&quot;, then your life is defintely sadder as it is obvious that you are not even using that word correctly.&quot;Y&#039;all&quot; is a contraction of the words &quot;you&quot; and &quot;all&quot;. Therefore, it is by definition plural and would require an s to be plural possessive. The examples you list would be better substituted with the word &quot;your&quot; as the context of the sentence indicates a singular meaning. Also, just so you know, I was born in Louisiana and have lived their and occasionally in Mississippi all my life which is why I am so critical of anyone who claims to be an expert on the word&#039;s usage just because she&#039;s from Louisiana.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephanie,</p>
<p>Obviously, if you believe that the only word you can use correctly is &#8220;y&#8217;all&#8221;, then your life is defintely sadder as it is obvious that you are not even using that word correctly.&#8221;Y&#8217;all&#8221; is a contraction of the words &#8220;you&#8221; and &#8220;all&#8221;. Therefore, it is by definition plural and would require an s to be plural possessive. The examples you list would be better substituted with the word &#8220;your&#8221; as the context of the sentence indicates a singular meaning. Also, just so you know, I was born in Louisiana and have lived their and occasionally in Mississippi all my life which is why I am so critical of anyone who claims to be an expert on the word&#8217;s usage just because she&#8217;s from Louisiana.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Lynn</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/22125/comment-page-1#comment-122999</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Lynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 20:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/22125#comment-122999</guid>
		<description>As another copy editor, I agree that I don&#039;t care as much about this kind of thing when I&#039;m not being paid to. (See? I just ended a sentence with a preposition.)

That said, rT is throwing stones at glass houses when he calls others asses. Celebrating illiteracy and careless use of language is idiotic. There&#039;s nothing pretentious about knowing how to use the word &quot;whom&quot;. And, knowing a smattering of Greek root words can be helpful in deciphering unfamiliar English words. 

And while it&#039;s true that language is always evolving, that doesn&#039;t mean it&#039;s a free-for-all. The evolution of language is a dialectic. On one side are the radicals who use it in new ways, and on the other are the conservatives who are sticklers for traditional rules of spelling and grammar. Between them, the language slowly evolves, forcing new words and grammar to prove their worth. Where language is useful and precise, it deserves to survive. Where it isn&#039;t, it doesn&#039;t.

To paraphrase a source I wish I could remember, yes, language evolves, but that doesn&#039;t mean we should let it devolve from fingers to flippers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As another copy editor, I agree that I don&#8217;t care as much about this kind of thing when I&#8217;m not being paid to. (See? I just ended a sentence with a preposition.)</p>
<p>That said, rT is throwing stones at glass houses when he calls others asses. Celebrating illiteracy and careless use of language is idiotic. There&#8217;s nothing pretentious about knowing how to use the word &#8220;whom&#8221;. And, knowing a smattering of Greek root words can be helpful in deciphering unfamiliar English words. </p>
<p>And while it&#8217;s true that language is always evolving, that doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s a free-for-all. The evolution of language is a dialectic. On one side are the radicals who use it in new ways, and on the other are the conservatives who are sticklers for traditional rules of spelling and grammar. Between them, the language slowly evolves, forcing new words and grammar to prove their worth. Where language is useful and precise, it deserves to survive. Where it isn&#8217;t, it doesn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>To paraphrase a source I wish I could remember, yes, language evolves, but that doesn&#8217;t mean we should let it devolve from fingers to flippers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: orange</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/22125/comment-page-1#comment-122983</link>
		<dc:creator>orange</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/22125#comment-122983</guid>
		<description>I have to agree with rT.  I took a few Linguistics courses in college, and it really changed the way I look at language.  My professor changed my world when she declared one day that, &quot;It is impossible to make a grammatical mistake in your native dialect.&quot;

Wait, what?  

Dialect refers to the specific way one&#039;s group speaks--it differs by region, and race, and culture, among other things and one does not make a mistake in their native dialect unless inebriated or otherwise compromised.  For communication purposes, Americans tend to switch from their native dialect to the Standard English Dialect.  This Dialect is the basis for all the grammatical mistakes we are attacking here.

I loved this course.  It helped me lighten up AND gave me a new respect for others&#039; differences.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with rT.  I took a few Linguistics courses in college, and it really changed the way I look at language.  My professor changed my world when she declared one day that, &#8220;It is impossible to make a grammatical mistake in your native dialect.&#8221;</p>
<p>Wait, what?  </p>
<p>Dialect refers to the specific way one&#8217;s group speaks&#8211;it differs by region, and race, and culture, among other things and one does not make a mistake in their native dialect unless inebriated or otherwise compromised.  For communication purposes, Americans tend to switch from their native dialect to the Standard English Dialect.  This Dialect is the basis for all the grammatical mistakes we are attacking here.</p>
<p>I loved this course.  It helped me lighten up AND gave me a new respect for others&#8217; differences.  :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/22125/comment-page-1#comment-122980</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/22125#comment-122980</guid>
		<description>gotmilk.com

The &quot;got milk&quot; campaign bothers me. No, I don&#039;t HAVE any milk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gotmilk.com</p>
<p>The &#8220;got milk&#8221; campaign bothers me. No, I don&#8217;t HAVE any milk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stephanie</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/22125/comment-page-1#comment-122974</link>
		<dc:creator>stephanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 18:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/22125#comment-122974</guid>
		<description>rT, you are just making up excuses, because you can&#039;t spell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rT, you are just making up excuses, because you can&#8217;t spell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephanie</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/22125/comment-page-1#comment-122973</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 18:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/22125#comment-122973</guid>
		<description>Hillary, I totally disagree with the y&#039;all thing.  As a Louisianian, I consider myself to be an expert on the usage of the word y&#039;all.  It is pretty much the only word I can use correctly.  Y&#039;all does not require an &quot;s&quot; to be possessive. 
Example:  I was over at y&#039;all house the other day.
or
I ate one of y&#039;all hamburgers, and they were mighty tasty.

Texas can suck it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary, I totally disagree with the y&#8217;all thing.  As a Louisianian, I consider myself to be an expert on the usage of the word y&#8217;all.  It is pretty much the only word I can use correctly.  Y&#8217;all does not require an &#8220;s&#8221; to be possessive.<br />
Example:  I was over at y&#8217;all house the other day.<br />
or<br />
I ate one of y&#8217;all hamburgers, and they were mighty tasty.</p>
<p>Texas can suck it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

