<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What’s So Premium About Premium Gasoline?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/22624/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/22624</link>
	<description>Feel Smart Again</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:23:33 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Yams</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/22624/comment-page-1#comment-216988</link>
		<dc:creator>Yams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/22624#comment-216988</guid>
		<description>Graham, doesn&#039;t Europe use mostly diesel?  That may be a clue to your question but I&#039;m not sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Graham, doesn&#8217;t Europe use mostly diesel?  That may be a clue to your question but I&#8217;m not sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: graham</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/22624/comment-page-1#comment-201231</link>
		<dc:creator>graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 19:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/22624#comment-201231</guid>
		<description>Does anyone know if the octane rating is the same in the US as it is in Europe...I was told that I need to use 89, not the recommended 93 because our 89 is their 93.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know if the octane rating is the same in the US as it is in Europe&#8230;I was told that I need to use 89, not the recommended 93 because our 89 is their 93.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/22624/comment-page-1#comment-162514</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 04:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/22624#comment-162514</guid>
		<description>We had a gas station that supposedly carried &quot;86&quot;. They closed it and razed it to the ground, but I still wonder. Not 85 or 87, but 86...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We had a gas station that supposedly carried &#8220;86&#8243;. They closed it and razed it to the ground, but I still wonder. Not 85 or 87, but 86&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bodegas</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/22624/comment-page-1#comment-126057</link>
		<dc:creator>bodegas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 01:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/22624#comment-126057</guid>
		<description>There are a few different means to achieving a higher octane rating.  One is to add leaded compounds (no longer acceptable).  Oxygenated compounds(i.e. alcohols)are also used.  These raise the overall compression rating for the fuel, however oxygenates generally produce less usable energy when combusted, lowering (albeit perhaps insignificantly) gas mileage.  Adding light (4-8 carbon) isoparaffin compounds significantly improves octane rating without the loss of power.  High performance racing fuels and aviation fuels are commonly comprised exclusively of isoparaffinic compounds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a few different means to achieving a higher octane rating.  One is to add leaded compounds (no longer acceptable).  Oxygenated compounds(i.e. alcohols)are also used.  These raise the overall compression rating for the fuel, however oxygenates generally produce less usable energy when combusted, lowering (albeit perhaps insignificantly) gas mileage.  Adding light (4-8 carbon) isoparaffin compounds significantly improves octane rating without the loss of power.  High performance racing fuels and aviation fuels are commonly comprised exclusively of isoparaffinic compounds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott-O</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/22624/comment-page-1#comment-126027</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott-O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 22:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/22624#comment-126027</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t worry, BW- I laughed at the part about the engine &quot;completed its stroke.&quot; Yes, &quot;fireonthemountain&quot;, as a matter of fact I DID feel a need to respond but unlike you, however, I dismounted my high horse first.

BW- your fun belongs here more than the pompous arrogance of others. I hope you stay anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t worry, BW- I laughed at the part about the engine &#8220;completed its stroke.&#8221; Yes, &#8220;fireonthemountain&#8221;, as a matter of fact I DID feel a need to respond but unlike you, however, I dismounted my high horse first.</p>
<p>BW- your fun belongs here more than the pompous arrogance of others. I hope you stay anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tiffany</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/22624/comment-page-1#comment-126002</link>
		<dc:creator>tiffany</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 21:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/22624#comment-126002</guid>
		<description>i giggled too, BW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i giggled too, BW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: n2y2</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/22624/comment-page-1#comment-125916</link>
		<dc:creator>n2y2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/22624#comment-125916</guid>
		<description>When you go to the mountain States - Colorado, Montana, Idaho, Utah - the pumps start at 85 AKI (Anti-Knock Index, read Octane) where most cars are rated for 87 AKI.  

Since the air is thinner and carries less oxygen at these high altitudes, it raises the effective AKI.  Supposedly 85 AKI is equivalent to 87 above ~6,000ft.  

However, I am always passing through when I see 85 octane gas, so I still fill up with the &#039;mid-grade&#039; 87 octane just in case there is still some of that fuel left in the tank when I return to my normal altitude.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you go to the mountain States &#8211; Colorado, Montana, Idaho, Utah &#8211; the pumps start at 85 AKI (Anti-Knock Index, read Octane) where most cars are rated for 87 AKI.  </p>
<p>Since the air is thinner and carries less oxygen at these high altitudes, it raises the effective AKI.  Supposedly 85 AKI is equivalent to 87 above ~6,000ft.  </p>
<p>However, I am always passing through when I see 85 octane gas, so I still fill up with the &#8216;mid-grade&#8217; 87 octane just in case there is still some of that fuel left in the tank when I return to my normal altitude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/22624/comment-page-1#comment-125885</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/22624#comment-125885</guid>
		<description>thank you for that, it was very infomative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank you for that, it was very infomative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Position Clicks</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/22624/comment-page-1#comment-125790</link>
		<dc:creator>Position Clicks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 21:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/22624#comment-125790</guid>
		<description>Reason #45: People think the higher the number the better the fuel. I know people that freak when you say your not using super, they tell me my car is going to blow up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reason #45: People think the higher the number the better the fuel. I know people that freak when you say your not using super, they tell me my car is going to blow up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fireonthemountain</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/22624/comment-page-1#comment-125787</link>
		<dc:creator>fireonthemountain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 21:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/22624#comment-125787</guid>
		<description>BW if you dont &quot;belong&quot; to this site why did you read the article and feel the need to respond?

-- re-tard   / - noun

Automotive, Machinery. an adjustment made in the setting of the distributor of an internal-combustion engine so that the spark for ignition in each cylinder is generated later in the cycle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BW if you dont &#8220;belong&#8221; to this site why did you read the article and feel the need to respond?</p>
<p>&#8211; re-tard   / &#8211; noun</p>
<p>Automotive, Machinery. an adjustment made in the setting of the distributor of an internal-combustion engine so that the spark for ignition in each cylinder is generated later in the cycle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
