<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Magazine Sneak Peek: Darwin Debunked?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/22751/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/22751</link>
	<description>Feel Smart Again</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:18:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Joseph</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/22751/comment-page-1#comment-159294</link>
		<dc:creator>David Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 15:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/22751#comment-159294</guid>
		<description>Darwinism is a lie, no fossil evidence for the mutation of life on this planet exists, we have fossils from thousands of years ago that are unchanged ... it&#039;s a flawed, speculative theory that doesn&#039;t have any evidence to back it up so it doesn&#039;t need to be debunked in the first instance. Where is the evidence for Darwinism? There is none ... It&#039;s a convenient back-story for the modern, atheistic, morally-fluid, religion-hating creed that feeds on captialism and political correctness. There is no Darwin myth to debunk. It&#039;s just a heap of junk foisted on us and the more one reads about it the more laughable and pathetic it is. Rock on! DJ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darwinism is a lie, no fossil evidence for the mutation of life on this planet exists, we have fossils from thousands of years ago that are unchanged &#8230; it&#8217;s a flawed, speculative theory that doesn&#8217;t have any evidence to back it up so it doesn&#8217;t need to be debunked in the first instance. Where is the evidence for Darwinism? There is none &#8230; It&#8217;s a convenient back-story for the modern, atheistic, morally-fluid, religion-hating creed that feeds on captialism and political correctness. There is no Darwin myth to debunk. It&#8217;s just a heap of junk foisted on us and the more one reads about it the more laughable and pathetic it is. Rock on! DJ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tanner</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/22751/comment-page-1#comment-133679</link>
		<dc:creator>Tanner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/22751#comment-133679</guid>
		<description>I see how this helps debunks Darwin. His theory stated that people that face things like famine need to die off in order for evolution to be true. Besides who wants to believe that we came from monkeys anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see how this helps debunks Darwin. His theory stated that people that face things like famine need to die off in order for evolution to be true. Besides who wants to believe that we came from monkeys anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tanner</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/22751/comment-page-1#comment-133676</link>
		<dc:creator>Tanner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/22751#comment-133676</guid>
		<description>It does help debunk Darwin, it shows how evolution is so idiotic. Who wants to believe that we came from monkeys!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It does help debunk Darwin, it shows how evolution is so idiotic. Who wants to believe that we came from monkeys!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leah</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/22751/comment-page-1#comment-126821</link>
		<dc:creator>Leah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 22:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/22751#comment-126821</guid>
		<description>Epigenetics doesn&#039;t &quot;debunk&quot; Darwin, but it DOES make one feel bad for ridiculing Lamarck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Epigenetics doesn&#8217;t &#8220;debunk&#8221; Darwin, but it DOES make one feel bad for ridiculing Lamarck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xian Pryde</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/22751/comment-page-1#comment-126783</link>
		<dc:creator>Xian Pryde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/22751#comment-126783</guid>
		<description>This is just Epigenetics. PBS&#039;s NOVA has done a show on this... it&#039;s very interesting, and cool, and we need to understand it better... but it &quot;debunks&quot; nothing about Darwin. Also, it&#039;s not the DNA itself that&#039;s being changed, it&#039;s the methylization of the DNA by the molecules surrounding the genome that&#039;s changing. So, neither Darwin nor Mendel are being debunked here: it&#039;s just a new layer of complexity added to the way genes are expressed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is just Epigenetics. PBS&#8217;s NOVA has done a show on this&#8230; it&#8217;s very interesting, and cool, and we need to understand it better&#8230; but it &#8220;debunks&#8221; nothing about Darwin. Also, it&#8217;s not the DNA itself that&#8217;s being changed, it&#8217;s the methylization of the DNA by the molecules surrounding the genome that&#8217;s changing. So, neither Darwin nor Mendel are being debunked here: it&#8217;s just a new layer of complexity added to the way genes are expressed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: devlin</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/22751/comment-page-1#comment-126756</link>
		<dc:creator>devlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/22751#comment-126756</guid>
		<description>Failing to see how this debunks Darwin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Failing to see how this debunks Darwin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chocfullanuts</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/22751/comment-page-1#comment-126749</link>
		<dc:creator>chocfullanuts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/22751#comment-126749</guid>
		<description>The only reason I am commenting is because my recaptcha is &quot;23 Underskirt&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only reason I am commenting is because my recaptcha is &#8220;23 Underskirt&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anomdeus</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/22751/comment-page-1#comment-126662</link>
		<dc:creator>anomdeus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/22751#comment-126662</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see how it necessarily debunks Darwin, just shows that inheritance through DNA is not as static as had been assumed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see how it necessarily debunks Darwin, just shows that inheritance through DNA is not as static as had been assumed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

