<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Life After Death &#8211; A Philosophical Discussion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/23560/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/23560</link>
	<description>Feel Smart Again</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:22:06 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Southern Buddhist</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/23560/comment-page-1#comment-131555</link>
		<dc:creator>Southern Buddhist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 06:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/23560#comment-131555</guid>
		<description>Wow, thanks for introducing me to Academic Earth.  It&#039;s still small, but it looks like a great site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, thanks for introducing me to Academic Earth.  It&#8217;s still small, but it looks like a great site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corinne</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/23560/comment-page-1#comment-131541</link>
		<dc:creator>Corinne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 04:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/23560#comment-131541</guid>
		<description>Hah, that&#039;s a coincidence, I just finished listening to his lectures a few days ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hah, that&#8217;s a coincidence, I just finished listening to his lectures a few days ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve S</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/23560/comment-page-1#comment-131505</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 23:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/23560#comment-131505</guid>
		<description>Just noticed that my last word should have been &quot;conscience&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just noticed that my last word should have been &#8220;conscience&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nutmeag</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/23560/comment-page-1#comment-131456</link>
		<dc:creator>nutmeag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/23560#comment-131456</guid>
		<description>I was thinking similarly to Steve S on this one. It made me think back to my favorite college philosophy/theology/literature course. 

The best thing about that class (besides the awesome reading material) was that our prof never once gave us his own opinion on the subject we were studying. Yes, I&#039;m sure it came through in his teaching (you can never objectively teach this subject matter), but still he never told us what to believe, or even what he believed. He asked a question at the beginning of the semester, let us ruminate on it during all of our readings and discussions, then had us write a final paper discussing our findings. He asked us to answer the question based on what we read and believed. To me, that&#039;s the best way to handle philosophy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was thinking similarly to Steve S on this one. It made me think back to my favorite college philosophy/theology/literature course. </p>
<p>The best thing about that class (besides the awesome reading material) was that our prof never once gave us his own opinion on the subject we were studying. Yes, I&#8217;m sure it came through in his teaching (you can never objectively teach this subject matter), but still he never told us what to believe, or even what he believed. He asked a question at the beginning of the semester, let us ruminate on it during all of our readings and discussions, then had us write a final paper discussing our findings. He asked us to answer the question based on what we read and believed. To me, that&#8217;s the best way to handle philosophy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve S</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/23560/comment-page-1#comment-131414</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/23560#comment-131414</guid>
		<description>Took over 36 minutes before I heard in his lecture what I had suspected all along. The fact that early on he equates the mind with the soul gave me a clue. The problem with this stance is that he is giving a lecture about a philosophy or belief that he knows little about. Philosophize all he wants, one person can never give a equally balanced argument for both sides. His belief will outweigh the other in the end.

Let&#039;s not take this into the argument of whether or not one believes in a soul. That&#039;s up to one&#039;s own belief but for those who do, dualist doesn&#039;t fit the description of a believer. Tri-ist might be a better characterization - the belief of a body, mind and soul. Some may call it a conscious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Took over 36 minutes before I heard in his lecture what I had suspected all along. The fact that early on he equates the mind with the soul gave me a clue. The problem with this stance is that he is giving a lecture about a philosophy or belief that he knows little about. Philosophize all he wants, one person can never give a equally balanced argument for both sides. His belief will outweigh the other in the end.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s not take this into the argument of whether or not one believes in a soul. That&#8217;s up to one&#8217;s own belief but for those who do, dualist doesn&#8217;t fit the description of a believer. Tri-ist might be a better characterization &#8211; the belief of a body, mind and soul. Some may call it a conscious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
