
Freud requires very little introduction, as his creation of the psychoanalytic wing of psychology has made him a household name. Freud divided our psyches into egos, superegos, and ids; advocated cocaine use for, among other things, indigestion; studied cerebral palsy; and made us all feel just a little bit weird about our relationships with our mothers. Finally, his notion of the Freudian slip gave us all a get-out-of-jail-free card for our occasional verbal lapses. Thanks, Sigmund.
When Colt was a young sailor, he made his first handgun, which had the novel feature of a rotating cartridge cylinder that turned when the hammer was cocked. His first effort to mass-produce the revolver failed, but he did manage to invent a naval mine that was the first-ever remote control explosive. In 1847, though, the government caught onto the brilliance of Colt’s quick-to-operate multiple shot and asked him to fill a large order. From that moment on, Colt revolvers became some of the most iconic and important firearms in American history.
Freud’s contributions to psychology certainly changed the way we think about how we think. Colt’s contributions to firearms technology changed the way we think about how we fight. Both are incredibly pivotal figures in history, but which one was the bigger genius?
[poll=36]
[See the whole bracket here.]
Here is the thing. Even though Freud was a pioneer in psychology most of his theories have since been proven wrong. I think that he was more of a creative mind than a genius.
posted by Zoe on 3-23-2009 at 3:22 am
God made man. Sam Colt made them equal.
Sigmund Freu–PENIS!!!
posted by Alden Pyle on 3-23-2009 at 4:01 pm
Although some of his theories are still hotly debated, Sigmund Freud, is widely regarded as a trailblazer in the realm of psychiatry and psychology. The Austrian psychiatrist and neurologist, who was allegedly the first to offer a comprehensive explanation of how human behavior is determined by the conscious and unconscious forces, is regarded as the founder of psychoanalysis.
However, there are numerous critics who have vehemently contested his views. Here are a few links to some interviews with some scholars on Freud.
Interview | No Pure Seduction: Allen Esterson On Freud’s Disputed Theories, Views And Methods http://bit.ly/aI6AOH
Interview | It’s Not All In The Mind: Malcolm Macmillan Analyzes Freudian Slips http://bit.ly/26MwQ7
Interview | Analyze This: Frank Cioffi On Freud’s “Pseudo-Science” http://bit.ly/aAkUDC
posted by Charles Carlini on 7-4-2010 at 1:45 pm