mental_floss magazine
SUBSCRIBE >
GIFT SUBSCRIPTIONS >
DIGITAL SUBSCRIPTIONS >
subscriber services >
This week, David Clark is our tour guide as we take a closer look at some of America’s greatest monuments. His series continues today with the story of a monument-in-progress, the unfinished tribute to Crazy Horse.

If everything goes according to plan, by the twenty-second century America’s largest monument won’t honor any presidents, and won’t glorify the Republic’s early history. It will be the most immense statue in the world – 563 feet high and 641 feet long – and it will depict a native warrior who lived and fought as an enemy of westward imperialism and a fugitive from the US government, who was driven from his people’s land and, after his surrender and imprisonment, surreptitiously murdered by US soldiers.
The gargantuan Crazy Horse Memorial, carved out of a mountain in the Black Hills just southwest of Mt. Rushmore, will certainly remind us that “the red man had great heroes, too” — as Chief Standing Bear of the Lakota Sioux intended it to — but it will also conjure all the fierce brutality and shameless injustice of American history, the kind of bloodstains that are scrubbed off our most well-known monuments. The image of Crazy Horse is at once a symbol for the many virtues of the Native Americans and for the many savage sins of the United States.
In the 1940s a group of Lakota chiefs decided to counter the iconography of Mr. Rushmore with a mountain sculpture of their own, in honor of those native civilizations that the US government and the apotheosized Presidents had systematically conquered. The chiefs found their craftsman in a Polish-American named Korczak Ziolkowski, who was out west already to work on Mt. Rushmore and relished the chance to devise and execute a colossal carving on his own terms. Ziolkowski didn’t consider himself “an Indian-lover,” in his words: rather, he was “a storyteller in stone” who respected the Lakota and their hero and understood the broad significance of a Crazy Horse monument. So the chiefs got their sculptor, and Ziolkowski got his life’s mission.
Ziolkowski scouted a site — the sacred mountain of Paha Sapa, also known as Thunderbird Mountain — and set to work in a wilderness without company or even roads (he had to bulldoze the first ones himself). He spent the remainder of his days, from 1949-1982, clambering on the rocks like a grey-bearded mountain goat, plotting and drilling, blasting, shoveling, and bulldozing — “carving” on the largest possible scale.
The unkempt sculptor exuded vitality; he carried himself as a cheery, rough-tongued, hard-drinking mountain man, an icon in his own right for the rugged individualism of the western “white man” — the cowboy, the settler, the prospector. He knew he had the talent for a more prosperous and celebrated life in the arts, but was fully devoted to the monument, the setting, the work, and the lifestyle. “I’m the world’s biggest chiseler,” he boasted. “I’ve got $23 dollars in my bank account . . . If I had stayed in the East I’d be a millionaire fancy-ass sculptor today.”
While almost single-handedly shaping the mountain, Ziolkowski suffered quite a few injuries, including two heart attacks. Once, his son Casimir mis-steered a tractor over a 170 foot cliff, tumbled through the air right over Korczak’s head — and luckily planted on the only soft dirt heap in sight, miraculously unharmed. After all this, Ziolkowski managed a peaceful death, and was buried in a tomb he blasted for himself at the base of the mountain, knowing he wouldn’t live to see Crazy Horse finished.
Early on, Ziolkowski’s first wife had joined him out in the Hills for a short time, then promptly divorced him. Apparently, the idea of wearing her life out with an eccentric dynamite-nut stranded in backwoods didn’t appeal to her, once she’d given it a try. The second wife worked out better: she endured, even thrived, and after Korczak’s death has been managing the project with the help of their clan of children (7 out of 10 are still working on or for the Memorial). There’s a visitor center and a museum at the base of the unfinished sculpture, which opened to educate the public and raise funds for continued work. In fact, Ziolkowski refused to accept government funding, fearing the Feds would hijack his vision, so the Crazy Horse Memorial is all privately funded by donations and visitor fees.
Crazy Horse’s nine-story-tall face was finished in 1998. There’s a catch, though: nobody knows exactly what Crazy Horse looked like. Whether the warrior chief refused to have his photograph taken for fear that it would steal his “shadow” and shorten his life, as one story goes, or he just didn’t care for the artistic medium, Crazy Horse left no (definitive) photographic remains. (There are plenty of “reputed” but unproven photos of Crazy Horse circulating today.) Ziolkowski, therefore, intended to fashion a nonspecific face to represent the Idea of Crazy Horse — a symbol rather than a mimetic likeness.
Plenty of controversy seethes around the Memorial. In the beginning, some local people opposed the project for racial reasons, and even went so far as to vandalize Ziolkowski’s smaller works out of spite. While racist opposition has faded in time, other forms continue. Some Native Americans protest that blasting images into their sacred mountains is no way to honor their cultures and traditions, regardless of whose faced is chiseled out in the end. And others wonder why Lakota chiefs conceived the project without the permission of Crazy Horse’s family, or why the Ziolkowski family seems to control the whole project (and handles all the funds). Still, none of the trouble has halted the work, which continues today and will keep on indefinitely.
The Crazy Horse Memorial is a tangle of paradoxes and sobering ironies. The largest sculpture in America will honor a people the United States trod over, a man the government captured and killed. The four heads of Mt. Rushmore — heroes of the white Republic — will be overshadowed by a larger-than-life reminder of one of the Republic’s greatest crimes. A lone Polish-American immigrant will have been the primary architect and sculptor of a tribute to Native American history, community, and values. And the colossal form will depict a man who was wary of photographers, of whom no unequivocal image survives. [Images courtesy of crazyhorsememorial.org.]
Previously: The Statue of Liberty, The Washington Monument, The Gateway Arch
David, I just wanted to say that I am really enjoying this series. Thanks!
posted by Terrence on 3-26-2009 at 2:13 pm
I am enjoying it as well and am glad to finally know what the face I passed during our summer road trip last year was all about.
posted by Sarah in CA on 3-26-2009 at 2:25 pm
I saw the Crazy Horse sculpture back around 1977 or ‘78. The head, if I remember correctly, was barely carved yet. There was a sign by the road showing what the completed sculpture would look like. Saying that the carving will be completed during the 22nd century seems about right, considering the scale and few workers.
posted by jeff on 3-26-2009 at 2:26 pm
I visited this sculpture right about when they finished the “face” (the celebration would be a few weeks after we were passing through) and I cannot think of a more phenomenal experience. Every summer, at least the last time I checked, they hold a volksmarch, where you can go right up to the sculpture. I still have the 2 large rocks we purchased from the blasting remains (a unique way to get donations)
posted by anaximander on 3-26-2009 at 3:20 pm
I went by this monument in 1987?? The only progress was a hole through the rock (underneath the future arm..)
I hadn’t seen it since then really – I guess I thought they’d be further along with it….
I wonder when it’ll be done….
posted by Dianne on 3-26-2009 at 4:22 pm
When I was young, back in the early ’70s, my sister and I got miniature statues of the finished design. Guess this is one project that’ll never be finished.
posted by Chad Cloman on 3-26-2009 at 5:49 pm
I had a chance to visit both carved mountains in South Dakota in the late 90s. Chance took me past Crazy Horse first, and Rushmore second. After the scale, fluidity, and vision presented at Crazy Horse, Rushmore was completely underwhelming. The Crazy Horse visit was also much more intimate — Rushmore seemed like a plastic tourist trap next to the rustic visitor center at the unfinished monument. It’s really something to see it in person.
posted by Katie on 3-26-2009 at 6:15 pm
I’m a South Dakotan (I live about half an hour from Crazy Horse), and I have one more paradox for you. Crazy Horse, and the Lakota Sioux, believed so much in not disturbing nature, that when they died, they asked not to have their bodies buried. Crazy Horse himself, legend says, had his body thrown off a cliff. I think it’s pretty clear what his opinion of the monument would be.
I would venture to say that the majority of Western South Dakotans dislike the monument, largely due to the “paradoxes” you mentioned. We see them more as hypocricies, however.
posted by Mandi on 3-27-2009 at 2:37 am
I saw Crazy Horse first shortly after the face was finished, I was impressed but I don’t think you really get a sense of the scale unless you take the hot dusty bus ride to the base, it’s so far away from the visitor center. I saw it again a year or two ago. My father and I stopped at the ticket booth and asked the guy if it had changed much (since it costs $20 to see it, I thikn Rushmore is $11 and we were on a tight budget) he assured us that it had changed dramatically. Nope. One piece of rock near the hand was blasted away and the space under the arm was more defined. Not $20 worth of change. Don’t get me wrong, I’m impressed and facinated by the monument, but I feel like he lied to us.
Rushmore on the other hand never ceases to take my breath away.
posted by Emmie on 3-27-2009 at 9:24 am
Jeez, David, have you ever had anything GOOD to say about America?
posted by Anthony on 3-27-2009 at 12:45 pm
i lived in wyoming in ‘03/’04 and saw Crazy Horse again then for the first time since ‘87 when it was just a sketch on the mountain side.
the little museum they have there is really interesting, though i wish it were a little bigger.
that whole area is interesting, if not a little sad. all the history, and all the bloodshed. that’s manifest destiny for you. :(
posted by em on 3-28-2009 at 2:04 am
I have visited and what caught my eye was a picture of the Pope, then I started to see who is involved, the same enemies of all people, the Jesuits and the vatican hiding behind the cloth and hospitality. I agree no Indian would want the sacred land blown up. even some of the Native people cannot see who is their enemy history is not all lost, the Native Americans need to know Just like people who fled Europe knew who was the enemy. cast them out.
touching display but the lies have to stop.
posted by atwitsend on 6-22-2009 at 11:46 pm