<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 15 Film Production Credits Explained</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/24537/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/24537</link>
	<description>Feel Smart Again</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 15:37:07 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ienlsi</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/24537/comment-page-1#comment-149738</link>
		<dc:creator>ienlsi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 08:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/24537#comment-149738</guid>
		<description>CGI or NOT?

Have a look here! You’ll love my post : &gt;xoxo

http://evidently.com/?p=2961</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CGI or NOT?</p>
<p>Have a look here! You’ll love my post : &gt;xoxo</p>
<p><a href="http://evidently.com/?p=2961" rel="nofollow">http://evidently.com/?p=2961</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the gostak</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/24537/comment-page-1#comment-137675</link>
		<dc:creator>the gostak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 06:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/24537#comment-137675</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m amazed at the people who get put in CGI film credits these days. 

One film I saw (I believe it was Coraline [which I realize was not all CGI]) had 
HR people (the Frankenhausers), data wranglers, and other odd and sundry credits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m amazed at the people who get put in CGI film credits these days. </p>
<p>One film I saw (I believe it was Coraline [which I realize was not all CGI]) had<br />
HR people (the Frankenhausers), data wranglers, and other odd and sundry credits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ramdev</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/24537/comment-page-1#comment-137450</link>
		<dc:creator>ramdev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 12:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/24537#comment-137450</guid>
		<description>I really wonder to see all the production credits explained in detail way so nearly you have explained 15 production credits and i guess that no one can tell like you and it was great Article or blog to discuss with people and i have gone through all your Article simply good than other articles, I know many of them love read and more on this site. thanks to everyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really wonder to see all the production credits explained in detail way so nearly you have explained 15 production credits and i guess that no one can tell like you and it was great Article or blog to discuss with people and i have gone through all your Article simply good than other articles, I know many of them love read and more on this site. thanks to everyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ramdev</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/24537/comment-page-1#comment-137448</link>
		<dc:creator>ramdev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 12:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/24537#comment-137448</guid>
		<description>I really wonder to see all the production credits explained in detail way so nearly you have explained 15 production credits and i guess that no one can tell like you and it was great Article or blog to discuss with people and i have gone through all your Article simply good than other articles, I know many of them love read and more on this site. thank you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really wonder to see all the production credits explained in detail way so nearly you have explained 15 production credits and i guess that no one can tell like you and it was great Article or blog to discuss with people and i have gone through all your Article simply good than other articles, I know many of them love read and more on this site. thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ramdev</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/24537/comment-page-1#comment-137445</link>
		<dc:creator>ramdev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 12:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/24537#comment-137445</guid>
		<description>I really wonder to see all the production credits explained in detail way so nearly you have explained 15 production credits and i guess that no one can tell like you and it was great Article or blog to discuss with people and i have gone through all your Article simply good than other articles, I know many of them love read and more on this site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really wonder to see all the production credits explained in detail way so nearly you have explained 15 production credits and i guess that no one can tell like you and it was great Article or blog to discuss with people and i have gone through all your Article simply good than other articles, I know many of them love read and more on this site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vladimir poopen</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/24537/comment-page-1#comment-137368</link>
		<dc:creator>vladimir poopen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 02:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/24537#comment-137368</guid>
		<description>2nd AC also does follow focus if I recall correctly</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2nd AC also does follow focus if I recall correctly</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Filmmaker</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/24537/comment-page-1#comment-137340</link>
		<dc:creator>Filmmaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 01:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/24537#comment-137340</guid>
		<description>To John Davis:

These people are not the reason movie prices are so high today... This has been the standard crew roster for making films for nearly 100 years. So while this has stayed constant other factors have made movie prices rise.

And most directors I&#039;ve worked with are not good DPs. Otherwise they&#039;d be dps too. The DP is also in charge of the gaffer (the lighting department) and the camera department and has final say over most things in the shot (putting them above the set department and people like the greensman). 

Interestingly enough it&#039;s the director who decides where to put the camera (what type of shot... long, medium, wide, close, etc)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To John Davis:</p>
<p>These people are not the reason movie prices are so high today&#8230; This has been the standard crew roster for making films for nearly 100 years. So while this has stayed constant other factors have made movie prices rise.</p>
<p>And most directors I&#8217;ve worked with are not good DPs. Otherwise they&#8217;d be dps too. The DP is also in charge of the gaffer (the lighting department) and the camera department and has final say over most things in the shot (putting them above the set department and people like the greensman). </p>
<p>Interestingly enough it&#8217;s the director who decides where to put the camera (what type of shot&#8230; long, medium, wide, close, etc)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A DP</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/24537/comment-page-1#comment-137327</link>
		<dc:creator>A DP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 01:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/24537#comment-137327</guid>
		<description>A Lead Man is in the art department. An AD runs the set.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Lead Man is in the art department. An AD runs the set.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/24537/comment-page-1#comment-137326</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/24537#comment-137326</guid>
		<description>Two posts here that make me wonder about the poster. The first was the buyer...duh...no one needs an explanation, we all know what a buyer does. Buyer is a verb form of the word &#039;buy&#039; so its pretty obvious to anyone that knows the English language. 

The second was the person that said &quot;This article would have been considerably better if half of the entries didn’t start with “Thought this meant XYZ? Wrong!” OK, I get it. Just tell me what the title means already!&quot; Looks like you didn&#039;t even read the article because there wasn&#039;t one that read exactly that way and three that were close. Three out of fifteen possbiles is NOT half. 7.5 would be half, so your math stinks. 

The article itself. Good, perhaps too general but enough info to have a basic understanding of the terms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two posts here that make me wonder about the poster. The first was the buyer&#8230;duh&#8230;no one needs an explanation, we all know what a buyer does. Buyer is a verb form of the word &#8216;buy&#8217; so its pretty obvious to anyone that knows the English language. </p>
<p>The second was the person that said &#8220;This article would have been considerably better if half of the entries didn’t start with “Thought this meant XYZ? Wrong!” OK, I get it. Just tell me what the title means already!&#8221; Looks like you didn&#8217;t even read the article because there wasn&#8217;t one that read exactly that way and three that were close. Three out of fifteen possbiles is NOT half. 7.5 would be half, so your math stinks. </p>
<p>The article itself. Good, perhaps too general but enough info to have a basic understanding of the terms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/24537/comment-page-1#comment-137323</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/24537#comment-137323</guid>
		<description>First there

There is one gaffer. Anybody under him is an electric. A grip is much more than a worker bee and should never touch a set piece. 

An easy way to see it is gaffer and his electrics do light while the key grip and grips do shadows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First there</p>
<p>There is one gaffer. Anybody under him is an electric. A grip is much more than a worker bee and should never touch a set piece. </p>
<p>An easy way to see it is gaffer and his electrics do light while the key grip and grips do shadows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
