<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Up, Up, and Away! 7 Modern Flying Car Designs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/24763/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/24763</link>
	<description>Feel Smart Again</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:18:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: macsnafu</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/24763/comment-page-1#comment-408243</link>
		<dc:creator>macsnafu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 17:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/24763#comment-408243</guid>
		<description>A flying car would be neat!  But tons of governmental red tape to get through.  I also think it would be more practical if it had VTOL, so no runways would be needed to take off or land.  A compact hovercar would probably make more sense in many ways than a true &quot;flying car&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A flying car would be neat!  But tons of governmental red tape to get through.  I also think it would be more practical if it had VTOL, so no runways would be needed to take off or land.  A compact hovercar would probably make more sense in many ways than a true &#8220;flying car&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leramic</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/24763/comment-page-1#comment-389707</link>
		<dc:creator>Leramic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 03:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/24763#comment-389707</guid>
		<description>i love  PAL-V One best, it looks small,but i think it must powerful</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i love  PAL-V One best, it looks small,but i think it must powerful</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agree</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/24763/comment-page-1#comment-274795</link>
		<dc:creator>Agree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 22:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/24763#comment-274795</guid>
		<description>I agree with the CFI on here, after flying for 3 years, hundreds of hours of training and safety classes, I dont really think a heavy car is going to fly well, but more important, we need the arogant drivers of the road in the air either!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the CFI on here, after flying for 3 years, hundreds of hours of training and safety classes, I dont really think a heavy car is going to fly well, but more important, we need the arogant drivers of the road in the air either!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard A. Strong</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/24763/comment-page-1#comment-261591</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard A. Strong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 02:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/24763#comment-261591</guid>
		<description>You are cordially invited to see my flying car project at www.strongware.com/dragon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are cordially invited to see my flying car project at <a href="http://www.strongware.com/dragon" rel="nofollow">http://www.strongware.com/dragon</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CFI</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/24763/comment-page-1#comment-248933</link>
		<dc:creator>CFI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 19:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/24763#comment-248933</guid>
		<description>As a flight instructor and commercial pilot, these fluffy news stories are a continued irritant.

The Sport pilot rating may indeed be the saving grace, but, FAA/AOPA statistics show that a pilot flying into clouds (fog) without instrument training and equipment has about 170 seconds to live before becoming disoriented. Get ready for that. Consider the crash in Oregon that killed a vacationing family on the ground because the pilot tried to get under a cloud layer descended to the surface.

Another problem has to do with legal authority. If you&#039;re flying over the freeway at 50&#039; and operating recklessly, is it police juristiction, or the FAA (what are they gonna do, pull you over?) This is not something the NTSB, FAA, DOT or highway patrols want to think about.

Next, consider parts. Look at the tires on the average Cessna alone. A Cessna 172 has 160-180HP depending on the engine, requires over 30&#039; of wingspan, and has three tiny wheels that could not possibly handle a pothole at highway speed, and a glorified lawnmower battery. Airplane parts must be lightweight, which translates to minimal durability or expensive, exotic parts and technology, and frequent replacement. 

If flying cars were practical, Mr. Taylor&#039;s aircraft--which is now at the Boeing museum in Seattle--would have stood a much better chance of navigating FAA safety standards then than it possibly could today. 

I would love to see some sort of flying car, but, I wish the media would stop reporting science fiction as if it were trivial to flip a switch and navigate an aircraft. The only thing the mainstream media seems to consider is cost and wow-value. In fact, many people have died because pilots put the cost of their airplane over the safety of themselves, their passengers and people on the ground.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a flight instructor and commercial pilot, these fluffy news stories are a continued irritant.</p>
<p>The Sport pilot rating may indeed be the saving grace, but, FAA/AOPA statistics show that a pilot flying into clouds (fog) without instrument training and equipment has about 170 seconds to live before becoming disoriented. Get ready for that. Consider the crash in Oregon that killed a vacationing family on the ground because the pilot tried to get under a cloud layer descended to the surface.</p>
<p>Another problem has to do with legal authority. If you&#8217;re flying over the freeway at 50&#8242; and operating recklessly, is it police juristiction, or the FAA (what are they gonna do, pull you over?) This is not something the NTSB, FAA, DOT or highway patrols want to think about.</p>
<p>Next, consider parts. Look at the tires on the average Cessna alone. A Cessna 172 has 160-180HP depending on the engine, requires over 30&#8242; of wingspan, and has three tiny wheels that could not possibly handle a pothole at highway speed, and a glorified lawnmower battery. Airplane parts must be lightweight, which translates to minimal durability or expensive, exotic parts and technology, and frequent replacement. </p>
<p>If flying cars were practical, Mr. Taylor&#8217;s aircraft&#8211;which is now at the Boeing museum in Seattle&#8211;would have stood a much better chance of navigating FAA safety standards then than it possibly could today. </p>
<p>I would love to see some sort of flying car, but, I wish the media would stop reporting science fiction as if it were trivial to flip a switch and navigate an aircraft. The only thing the mainstream media seems to consider is cost and wow-value. In fact, many people have died because pilots put the cost of their airplane over the safety of themselves, their passengers and people on the ground.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trina</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/24763/comment-page-1#comment-235389</link>
		<dc:creator>Trina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/24763#comment-235389</guid>
		<description>If you&#039;re going to spend that much money on a flying car, you might as well just buy a small airplane.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re going to spend that much money on a flying car, you might as well just buy a small airplane.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Mudkips</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/24763/comment-page-1#comment-232749</link>
		<dc:creator>David Mudkips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 04:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/24763#comment-232749</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m completely surprised that the Moller Sky Car isn&#039;t on this list:

http://www.moller.com/

This dingbat has been peddling the same vapor-ware for DECADES.  I remember reading his propaganda in the &#039;70s as a kid... and he&#039;s managed to continue duping investors for over 30 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m completely surprised that the Moller Sky Car isn&#8217;t on this list:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.moller.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.moller.com/</a></p>
<p>This dingbat has been peddling the same vapor-ware for DECADES.  I remember reading his propaganda in the &#8217;70s as a kid&#8230; and he&#8217;s managed to continue duping investors for over 30 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cleatus99</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/24763/comment-page-1#comment-154935</link>
		<dc:creator>Cleatus99</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 13:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/24763#comment-154935</guid>
		<description>You missed one that is already operational, the Super Sky Cycle.
http://www.thebutterflyllc.com/sscycle/gallery.htm
Larry Neal, in Bridgeport Texas is selling kits to build your own with Folding Rotor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You missed one that is already operational, the Super Sky Cycle.<br />
<a href="http://www.thebutterflyllc.com/sscycle/gallery.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.thebutterflyllc.com/sscycle/gallery.htm</a><br />
Larry Neal, in Bridgeport Texas is selling kits to build your own with Folding Rotor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpaceMonkeyX</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/24763/comment-page-1#comment-137976</link>
		<dc:creator>SpaceMonkeyX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/24763#comment-137976</guid>
		<description>Jim-
As I was doing my research for this story, MASK was on my mind the whole time.  The SkyBike and the Sokol A400 also look like they could have been involved in the fight against VENOM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim-<br />
As I was doing my research for this story, MASK was on my mind the whole time.  The SkyBike and the Sokol A400 also look like they could have been involved in the fight against VENOM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/24763/comment-page-1#comment-137972</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/24763#comment-137972</guid>
		<description>I can guarantee you whoever designed that PAL-V was a fan of the MASK cartoon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can guarantee you whoever designed that PAL-V was a fan of the MASK cartoon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

