<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brain Game: Zero Hour</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/26370/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/26370</link>
	<description>Feel Smart Again</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 10:01:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/26370/comment-page-1#comment-146343</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 21:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/26370#comment-146343</guid>
		<description>Yes, Michelle, it is a rule of number theory for both 3 and 9. Any multi-digit number whose digits add up to a multiple of 3 (or 9) is divisible by 3 (or 9). I was taught this as a technique called &quot;casting out 3s&quot;, which can be used for checking math calculations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Michelle, it is a rule of number theory for both 3 and 9. Any multi-digit number whose digits add up to a multiple of 3 (or 9) is divisible by 3 (or 9). I was taught this as a technique called &#8220;casting out 3s&#8221;, which can be used for checking math calculations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/26370/comment-page-1#comment-145755</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 18:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/26370#comment-145755</guid>
		<description>I notice all the answers sum up to 12...15...18

Is that some mathmatical rule? Like how the two digits of multiples of 9 add up to 9?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I notice all the answers sum up to 12&#8230;15&#8230;18</p>
<p>Is that some mathmatical rule? Like how the two digits of multiples of 9 add up to 9?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Y.</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/26370/comment-page-1#comment-145712</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Y.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 15:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/26370#comment-145712</guid>
		<description>Sandy, it looks like those two trio are both there because they preserve the order and the digit that moves from the ones digit to the hundreds digit doesn&#039;t carry when multiplied by 3.  E.g. 273 -&gt; 327 and 192 -&gt; 219.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sandy, it looks like those two trio are both there because they preserve the order and the digit that moves from the ones digit to the hundreds digit doesn&#8217;t carry when multiplied by 3.  E.g. 273 -&gt; 327 and 192 -&gt; 219.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandy Wood</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/26370/comment-page-1#comment-145687</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy Wood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 12:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/26370#comment-145687</guid>
		<description>Looks like you&#039;re correct, MikeTrig; I&#039;ve added yours to the list of solutions.

One thing I noticed when adding yours is that the top two answers use the same digit-trios in each group... same with the bottom two answers. Interesting!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like you&#8217;re correct, MikeTrig; I&#8217;ve added yours to the list of solutions.</p>
<p>One thing I noticed when adding yours is that the top two answers use the same digit-trios in each group&#8230; same with the bottom two answers. Interesting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeTrig</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/26370/comment-page-1#comment-145673</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeTrig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 12:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/26370#comment-145673</guid>
		<description>I think there is a fourth answer.

327...654...981

327*2=654 and 327*3=981</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there is a fourth answer.</p>
<p>327&#8230;654&#8230;981</p>
<p>327*2=654 and 327*3=981</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

