Where Knowledge Junkies Get Their Fix
McAfee Secure sites help keep you safe from identity theft, credit card fraud, spyware, spam, viruses and online scams
Eric Johnson
4 Quick Stories About Iran’s Supreme Leader
by Eric Johnson - June 23, 2009 - 9:56 AM

khamenei 1While the protests in Iran continue to rage on, it might help to gain a bit of perspective on the country’s leadership. Since 1979, the ultimate ruling power has been in the hands of the Supreme Leader – not the president.

Iran is currently under the rule of its second leader, Ali Hoseyni Khamenei (the first, you’ll remember, was the leader of the ’79 revolution, Ruhollah Khomeini, who died in June of 1989). With just over two decades of authority under his belt, Khamenei remains an obscure figure on the international political scene. We’re just going to skip over the standard biographical details, however, to bring you these four quick stories:

1. He sticks to his word about America

In June of 1981, a few months before Khamenei was elected as Iran’s president, his political career nearly ended with a bang. While he was speaking at a Tehran mosque, a bomb disguised as a tape recorder went off in front of him, leaving his right arm permanently damaged and injuring his vocal cords.

But what does this have to do with his attitude towards the West? Khamenei was one of the leaders in the 1979 riots, in which protesters rejected the U.S.-backed shah and denounced the United States’ leadership and culture. When the future Ayatollah was offered American medical care for his injuries from the bomb blast, he turned it down. The reason? He realized he couldn’t yell “Death to America!” in good conscience if he had been taken care of by the country’s medical system.

2. He once stormed out of a state dinner

khamenei 2In 1986, a dinner was held in Zimbabwe to honor President Khamenei. But, as the New York Times reported in an article headlined “The Man Who Almost Came to Dinner,” the president wasn’t at all happy with how the dinner had been arranged: “Mr. Khamenei objected to seating arrangements, which placed two women at the head table, and to the inclusion of wine on the menu.”

To Khamenei, the women and liquor were violations of Islamic law. But when his Zimbabwean hosts refused to compromise, saying that women were crucial to the country’s mission, the president left. The dinner being held in his honor went on without him.

3. He can be a tad thin-skinned

If you believe the Iranian leadership’s critics, the current protests are the beginning of Khamenei’s undoing. Just in case that comes to pass, Iranian expatriates who have a beef with the Ayatollah’s personality are coming out of the woodwork. Azar Nafisi, an academic now living in the U.S., told the New York Times that the Supreme Leader was not at all happy with those who dared disagree with him. “Khamenei would always come and say, ‘Shut up; what I say goes,’” Nafisi says. “Everyone would say, ‘O.K., it is the word of the leader.’”

This description is backed up by a story told in a report from The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. They wrote last year that “criticism of the [Supreme] Leader is one of the few remaining redlines in Iranian politics, almost a guarantee of a prison sentence.” And the taboo about criticizing Khamenei isn’t limited by bloodline. The Grand Ayatollah’s brother, a reformist cleric named Hadi Khamenei, delivered a sermon criticizing the powers of the Supreme Leader. Hadi was subsequently beaten up by members of the Basij militia, which reports to Iran’s infamous Revolutionary Guard.

4. He argued for the rights of African-Americans

According to a 1984 article in the Times, when Khamenei was president (1981-1989), he called for the creation of an international committee to review the living conditions of black Americans. According to the national Iranian press agency, the ultimate goal of the proposed committee would be to “bring the U.S. Government to trial.”

Khamenei is quoted by the press agency as saying, “a great majority of the blacks in the United States live in miserable conditions and do not have the least facilities for their daily living.”

More from mental_floss

7 Civil War Stories You Didn’t Learn in High School
*
Mistaken Identities and Executions: 6 Murderers Who Didn’t Do It
*
The World’s 10 Messiest Food Festivals
*
Where Are These Thousand Islands? The Origins of 7 Condiments & Sauces
*
Cheetos Lip Balm & Other Bizarre Brand Extensions

twitterbanner.jpg

shirts-555.jpg

tshirtsubad_static-11.jpg

Comments (5)
  1. - He stones gays and adulterers.
    - He imprisons his political opponents.
    - He denies the rights of his people to free speech, free assembly, and for damn sure there’s no freedom of religion.

    And for context, Krushchev, Kim, Hussein et al use the civil rights issue in America as cover for their own brutal abuses. So let’s not pretend the man actually cares about the rights of American minorities.

  2. I thought it was implied that his African-American support was a political stunt. I wonder whether his “international committee” ever met.

  3. sounds like a nice guy

  4. If you are participating in the Iranian Riots or know someone who is and wish to remain safe? Let me help by showing you how to distinguish between those who are angry and those who are lethal. http://www.aggressionmanagement.com/Riots-in-Iran.htm

  5. Obviously -although it’s the last thing Team Obama wants to hear- Ronald Reagan’s support of Poland’s Solidarity in the dark days of the Soviet-ordered crackdown is the model here- not the preposterous straw-man argument of “what are you going to do, invade?” disingenuously presented by the do-nothing, Obamapologist left.

    And isn’t this what George W Bush told you was going to happen in the Middle East in the wake of Iraq’s liberation?

    Maybe that’s why Barack Obama has so little apparent interest in finishing the job in Iran… no matter how much it benefits the US and free world.

    That, and the fact that he’s already piled all his chips on legitimizing this vile regime- a democratic revolution at this point would be downright embarrassing for him.

Comment

commenting policy