<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chef to would-be copycats: Eat this</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/2707/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/2707</link>
	<description>Feel Smart Again</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 06:19:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/2707/comment-page-1#comment-4566</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 19:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/2707#comment-4566</guid>
		<description>Copyrighting a recipe might not provide the protection the chef desires.  A copyright prevents others from, quite literally, copying the work.  In the case of books, lyrics, or even artwork, the &quot;copy&quot; has value because it is a replication of the work.  With a recipe, the value is both in the information and the outcome.  A copyright on the Recipe, then, would stop anyone from putting the recipe in a cook book, or selling the recipe.  But it would not protect the finished dish.  Unless the cook then copyrights the finished dish as a sculpture ... but it isn&#039;t intended to be a sculpture, so there could be a question as to the chef lying on the copyright application.  Then there is the whole mess created when we bring in placing goods in the &quot;Stream of commerce.&quot;

A patent seems like the more natural fit of a recipe, as patents protect ideas and methods ... and that is what a recipe is at heart.  The downside, however, would be that patents, by definition, are finite (17 years).

Whew ... what a mess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Copyrighting a recipe might not provide the protection the chef desires.  A copyright prevents others from, quite literally, copying the work.  In the case of books, lyrics, or even artwork, the &#8220;copy&#8221; has value because it is a replication of the work.  With a recipe, the value is both in the information and the outcome.  A copyright on the Recipe, then, would stop anyone from putting the recipe in a cook book, or selling the recipe.  But it would not protect the finished dish.  Unless the cook then copyrights the finished dish as a sculpture &#8230; but it isn&#8217;t intended to be a sculpture, so there could be a question as to the chef lying on the copyright application.  Then there is the whole mess created when we bring in placing goods in the &#8220;Stream of commerce.&#8221;</p>
<p>A patent seems like the more natural fit of a recipe, as patents protect ideas and methods &#8230; and that is what a recipe is at heart.  The downside, however, would be that patents, by definition, are finite (17 years).</p>
<p>Whew &#8230; what a mess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justin case</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/2707/comment-page-1#comment-4565</link>
		<dc:creator>justin case</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 19:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/2707#comment-4565</guid>
		<description>This is just another example of people trying to seek copyright for everything these days... a trend bound to chill creativity and the expression of new ideas, most of which are built upon previous work.  It&#039;s not as though Cantu created his recipes and processes whole cloth; they build upon years of cooking traditions and food science. May he continue to make interesting food, but fail utterly in copyrighting recipes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is just another example of people trying to seek copyright for everything these days&#8230; a trend bound to chill creativity and the expression of new ideas, most of which are built upon previous work.  It&#8217;s not as though Cantu created his recipes and processes whole cloth; they build upon years of cooking traditions and food science. May he continue to make interesting food, but fail utterly in copyrighting recipes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

