mental_floss magazine
SUBSCRIBE >
GIFT SUBSCRIPTIONS >
DIGITAL SUBSCRIPTIONS >
subscriber services >
Maybe it’s the apocalyptic mood everyone seems to be in lately — just look at how many of this summer’s blockbusters feature the End of Everything — or North Korea’s increasingly bellicose nuke-talk (are they really going to shoot a missile at Hawaii this Saturday?) but lately I’ve found myself checking out vintage (and some not-so-vintage) footage of nuclear bombs exploding on YouTube, and it’s really hypnotic stuff. Soothing almost. (Hey, at least the end of the world will look cool.) I also discovered a few nuclear devices I didn’t know existed. Like —
Known as the “Davy Crockett,” it’s the smallest tactical nuke ever built, developed (but never deployed) in the 50s for use by field troops in a potential ground invasion. Part of the thinking was that in addition to the destructive power of the explosion itself, the fallout from the nuclear rifle’s blast would halt enemy troop advance for a few days (as soldiers sickened with radiation poisoning aren’t much good to either side), long enough to call in NATO reinforcements. The trouble was, the Davy Crockett’s firing range was just three miles, which wouldn’t get the nuke far enough away from the side that had fired it to protect them from nuclear fallout.
Designed to fire 4.5-foot-long nuclear payloads, “Atomic Annie” was tested only once, and despite impressive results, the device was (thankfully) never used in actual combat. Here’s an amazing video of the May, 1953 test.
The largest nuke ever detonated was the Russians’ “Tsar Bomba,” a 50 megaton monster hydrogen bomb, and its test in 1961 marked the single most powerful physical event ever triggered by humans in the history of the world. A few numbers to put things in perspective:
• The mushroom cloud was 40 miles high, seven times higher than Everest.
• The heat from the explosion could have caused third-degree burns 62 miles from ground zero.
• It broke windows in Sweden, more than 600 miles from the Arctic test range.
• Its power output was equal to about 1.5% of the sun’s.
The Soviets brought along a few film cameras during the test, so we can watch the results.
At the Nevada Nuclear Test Site, a good portion of the thousands of nuke tests done over the years have been underground. Ever wondered what a nuke detonated underground looks like from the surface? As you’ll see in this video, it’s pretty remarkable. Watch the skin of the earth deform more and more — rising 290 feet — before finally breaking open. Amazing.
Nuclear-armed submarines have been carting nukes around the world’s oceans for decades now, but have you ever seen one of their payloads explode underwater? Here are two tests from the 1960s.
In this video, a massive tidal wave caused by the explosion capsizes a battleship in the foreground. Wow.
I’m on Twitter. Boom.
Is that Adam West narrating in video 5?
posted by Bryan on 6-29-2009 at 1:20 pm
I found the atomic cannon particularly hypnotic. Wish I could read the subtitles for the Tsar Bomba. Can anyone translate?
recaptcha: sunspots 8:30-Midnight
posted by Hastings on 6-29-2009 at 1:55 pm
Coolest.
Article.
Ever.
posted by Sam on 6-29-2009 at 2:13 pm
For a real atomic bombfest experience, find the movie “Trinity And Beyond.” It’s a great documentary about atomic blasts from Trinity thru the 60’s. Complete with narration and classical music. Even better, 1 1/2 hrs. of endless atomic blasts can be accompanied by your own soundtrack!
posted by Bubba on 6-29-2009 at 3:12 pm
BTW, my copy of “Trinity And Beyond” even came with 3-D glasses to use with one of the “special features.”
posted by Bubba on 6-29-2009 at 3:14 pm
I loved this article. I had an eenvironmental science class in College a year or so ago and did a report on “Nuclear Waste Disposal” I had to go into what atomic/nuclear energy is including bombs…. if you havent checked out any of this stuff you should it is very interesting and enlightening as to how people think nuclear energy is a horrible thing but our best bet at cleaning our environment
posted by Jeremiah on 6-29-2009 at 7:53 pm
Okay, a nuclear anti-submarine torpedo doesn’t really make sense. You don’t have to do that much damage to a sub to take it down. Nuke torpedoes are generally referred to as “fleet torpedoes” – as in you hit one surface vessel and take out the whole fleet.
The Air Force deployed (but never used) the Genie nuclear air-to-air missile. It was designed to vaporize a whole flight of incoming Russian bombers. F-106 interceptors carried them into the 1970’s.
posted by PartiallyDeflected on 6-29-2009 at 8:12 pm
We’eeeellll meet againnnn…don’t know how…don’t know whennnn…but I know we’ll meet again some sunny dayyyyy!
posted by Johnston on 6-29-2009 at 10:16 pm
That wasn’t Adam West, but William Shatner.
posted by Jim on 6-30-2009 at 10:53 am
My bad, I was just referring to the Trinity and Beyond videos. Yes, that does sound like Adam West.
posted by Jim on 6-30-2009 at 12:30 pm