mental_floss magazine
SUBSCRIBE >
GIFT SUBSCRIPTIONS >
DIGITAL SUBSCRIPTIONS >
subscriber services >

Steve Lekson is an archaeologist at the University of Colorado. And he’s got a controversial theory: ancient settlements in the American Southwest were organized along the 108th meridian of longitude (also called the “Chaco meridian”). He theorizes that the many large, abandoned settlements along that line point to a pattern of north-south-north-south migration that may have arisen from political, cultural, or environmental changes in the distant past. Other archaeologists think Lekson is, to use the vernacular, on crack. The New York Times has an interesting profile of Lekson’s work and his peers’ reaction to it. Here’s a snippet:
“It’s a hell of a long way from here to Chaco,” says Steve Lekson, an archaeologist from the University of Colorado, as he sights along the north-south spoke of the cross. Follow his gaze 400 miles north and you reach Chaco Canyon in northwestern New Mexico, a major cultural center occupied from about A.D. 900 to A.D. 1150 by the pueblo people known as Anasazi. Despite the distance, Dr. Lekson believes the two sites were linked by an ancient pattern of migration and a common set of religious beliefs.
But don’t stop at Chaco. Continue about 60 miles northward along the same straight line and you come to another Anasazi center called Aztec Ruins. For Dr. Lekson the alignment must be more than a coincidence.
A decade ago in “The Chaco Meridian: Centers of Political Power in the Ancient Southwest,” he argued that for centuries the Anasazi leaders, reckoning by the stars, aligned their principal settlements along this north-south axis — the 108th meridian of longitude. In an article this year for Archaeology magazine, he added two older ruins to the trajectory: Shabik’eschee, south of Chaco, and Sacred Ridge, north of Aztec. Each in its time was the regional focus of economic and political power, and each lies along the meridian. As one site was abandoned, because of drought, violence, environmental degradation — the reasons are obscure — the leaders led an exodus to a new location: sometimes north, sometimes south, but hewing as closely as they could to the 108th meridian.
Read the rest for a great look at a scientist currently working in the field…and the voices of other scientists who think he’s full of it. (Read a well-researched dissenting opinion.)
(Chaco Canyon photo courtesy of Flickr user AndrewEick, used under Creation Commons license.)
Maybe this is a gap in my knowledge, but why would these ancients have calculated the meridian in the same position that we do? Ours are calibrated by the one centered in Greenwich, right? Or is there something inherent in the way the meridians are defined?
posted by JT on 7-1-2009 at 3:35 pm
I think it’s supposed to be coincidence that the “Chaco meridian” happens to align with our modern 108th meridian (which, you’re right, is based on Greenwich as the Prime Meridian).
As I understand it, the significant thing is just that there are lots of settlements along a particular north-south axis (or meridian).
posted by Chris Higgins on 7-1-2009 at 3:39 pm
The 108th meridian, you say? Perhaps there is an unexplored connection to LOST that we are over-looking. Maybe the Anasazi were the exiled remnants of Jacob’s People, who settled on the 108th meridian in an attempt to return to their island. Yeah, that’s the ticket.
posted by Nate the Great on 7-1-2009 at 7:52 pm
Nate’s got it right!
recaptcha: Mr nosing (best I’ve ever seen!)
posted by taylor on 7-1-2009 at 8:07 pm
This reminds me of the time a student asked my favorite Archaeology professor a question so moronic it has achieved near-legendary status:
She had given a lecture on how much people groups had migrated across Europe and Asia in the course of a few centuries, and asked students why they thought people might have ended up as spread-out as they had. (A proper answer might have been that they were following the herds which provided their food, for example.) A kid raised his hand and asked, “Could that be because of continental drift?” The entire class lost it, and God help her, my professor struggled valiantly to keep a straight face.
From a layperson that might not have been so bad, but from a guy who claimed to be an Archaeology major, it was just stunning! When my friend told me about it, I laughed until I cried. She dreaded going to class because the guy asked questions that dumb -every time- the class met. (I may not have learned as much, but I would happily have traded sections with her, just for the entertainment value!)
posted by Valkyrie on 7-2-2009 at 1:16 am