mental_floss magazine
SUBSCRIBE >
GIFT SUBSCRIPTIONS >
DIGITAL SUBSCRIPTIONS >
subscriber services >
It’s time for another whimsical Tuesday Turnip Google search wherein I type a random phrase and we see what kind of interesting factoids “turn-up.”
Today I typed in “common 100 years ago” – unearthing the following curious entries:
- Niacin deficiency, known as pellagra, was common 100 years ago but today is extremely rare.
- Smoking is no more acceptable than chewing tobacco and spitting on the floor – a habit that was very common 100 years ago and would horrify people now.
- Plans have been announced to save the British short story. The genre, common 100 years ago, is now, like the red squirrel, a seriously endangered species, according to its supporters.
- The count began in 1900, when ornithologist Frank Chapman organized a bird census to protest the indiscriminate shooting that was common 100 years ago.
- Essay tests were common 100 years ago, but they were too expensive to give to everybody everywhere. That’s why they were replaced by machine-scored multiple choice tests.
- “Some seven men form an association”, in the rarely-performed Gilbert & Sullivan operetta Utopia Limited, is often quoted by legal writers as evidence that corporate fraud was as common 100 years ago as it is today.
- While ‘one-stop shopping‘ was quite common 100 years ago with general stores dotting the landscape, we have slowly evolved to a retail dynamic that specializes along category lines.
- Rather than roll dice, toss coins, or pick balls from urns–methods that were common 100 years ago–today they often use random numbers drawn from a table or generated by a computer.
- Single parenting was just as common 100 years ago as today [ed note: say wha?]
- Illegitimacy and extra marital affairs were just as common 100 years ago as they are today, our forebears were just more adept at keeping them secret.
Oh my god, I love pellagra! I mean, I don’t LOVE love it but it’s a really cool nutrient deficiency. You know, not Cool cool but interesting. Whatever. Don’t judge me.
posted by Amanda on 12-19-2006 at 10:47 am
great phrase! I love the spitting fact…
posted by Mangesh on 12-19-2006 at 11:12 am
The one on random numbers piqued my interest. David didn’t say who “they” was that used those old methods 100 years ago. The article states
I don’t recall drawing balls from urns being used for anything but Bingo and lotteries (where they’re still the only acceptable methods used today, since they’re most tamper-safe). But I don’t recall ever hearing about gamblers consulting tables of random numbers. (Although back in my gaming days, I knew DungeonMasters who did so. Perhaps before dice with other than 6 sides were common?)
But I’m sure a lot of kids still use “random numbers … to estimate calculations in … mathematics and science” homework, just like I used to!
posted by OwenKL on 12-20-2006 at 2:20 am