Where Knowledge Junkies Get Their Fix
Wonderful things from the Times book review section, #1
by Mary - January 8, 2007 - 7:44 AM

blahblah.JPGThe novelist Richard Powers had an article this weekend about dictating, rather than writing, literary works. There’s sparkly trivia in it, which I’ll share in a bit, but first I have a question: Powers is arguing that when it comes to writing things down, “you’d be hard-pressed to invent a greater barrier to cognitive flow.” As a reporter, though, I’ve often found that people are surprised at how clumsy their off-the-cuff speech is and, on reading their own quotes in an article, often want to write in something more mellifluous instead. That seems to go directly against what Powers is saying. Thoughts, anyone? Are people more eloquent or less when they speak, as opposed to when they write? And where does the old advice to “write like you talk” come in?

Anyway, on to the trivia:

For most of history, most reading was done out loud. Augustine remarks with surprise that Bishop Ambrose could read without moving his tongue. Our passage into silent text came late and slow, and poets have resisted it all the way. From Homer to hip-hop, the hum is what counts. Blind Milton chanted “Paradise Lost” to his daughters. Of his 159-line “Tintern Abbey,” Wordsworth said, “I began it upon leaving Tintern … and concluded … after a ramble of four or five days. … Not a line of it was altered, and not any part of it written down till I reached Bristol.” Wallace Stevens used to compose while walking to work, then dictate the results to his secretary, before proceeding to his official correspondence as vice president of the Hartford insurance company. …

Even novelists, working in a form so very written, have needed to write by voice. Stendhal dictated “The Charterhouse of Parma” in seven weeks. An impoverished Dostoyevsky had just six weeks to deliver the manuscript of “The Gambler” or face complete ruin. He hired a stenographer, knocked the book out in four weeks, then married the girl. …

Once, while dictating “Finnegans Wake” to Beckett, Joyce is said to have answered a knock on the door; Beckett dutifully jotted down his “Come in.” Surprised by the transcript, a delighted Joyce let it ride.

Legend claims that the astoundingly prolific William Vollmann once tried speech recognition software while suffering from repetitive stress injury. He sat down to write his folks. “Dear Mom and Dad” came out as the much more Vollmannesque “The man is dead.”

Comments (3)
  1. As a newspaper copy editor, I deal with these questions on a regular basis. Here are several observations, in no particular order:

    1. Many people are no more eloquent when they write than they are when they speak.
    2. I am a firm believer in writing “the way you talk,” but only if you can speak in something remotely resembling a clear and precise manner. (In my humble opinion, there are some public officials who would be better off not speaking or writing at all.)
    3. I have not read many novels since graduating from college, but some of my least favorite ones in school were the ones that seemed like an unedited stream of consciousness. If I wanted to expose myself to something that disjointed and opaque, I would have interviewed a paranoid schizophrenic off his/her “meds.”

  2. I am not a newspaper copy editor, or anything similar. I am by no means any sort of expert in this subject.

    However, it takes me quite a while to gather my thoughts when I am speaking, and I tend to ramble on while I am doing so. I’m not a great writer, but I would rather read something I wrote than a transcript of me speaking.

    Also, I’ve noticed that most speeches are better when they are written out beforehand. And when someone writes something out, he can use a thesaurus and a dictionary, which can potentially make the writing less confusing.

  3. i think it depends on the generation. i’m 30 and by the time i was writing papers in high school i was typing them, brain to keyboard, not brain to paper to keyboard.

    when instant messaging (on the old vax system) was available in college i became a much faster typist and feel like i can almost type at the speed of thought.

    older people who did not grow up with real-time text conversation probably feel more comfortable speaking than typing.

    as for hand-writing, that’s very very slow and clumsy compared to my typing. and somehow, even when i write by hand, i have a really head time capitalizing sentences. i’m so used to seeing things in lowercase that i look down at what i’ve written and realize i never capitalized “i” or many other words.

    interesting.

Comment

commenting policy