Comments (7)

1. Of course.. how could I have missed that

   posted by Lee on 10-8-2009 at 8:25 am

2. Nice one :) I would never have guessed Roman numerals.

   posted by Chris in South Korea on 10-8-2009 at 8:45 am

3. In finding patterns (other than yours, yours are usually non numeric based) I look at the difference in the numbers. in this case 4,5,2,2,3,3,4,5, so logically the next would be 32. Not what you were looking for I know.
   Sorry I had to find another pattern there.

   posted by KevinGA on 10-8-2009 at 9:15 am

4. Yeah, that is the answer I got as well KevinGA, Glad to know I wasn’t the only one.

   posted by Allen on 10-8-2009 at 10:45 am

5. I try that first too, Kevin (even though I know that’s seldom the direction in which Sandy goes), but I’m not quite clear on what the “pattern” is that you’re seeing.

   Are you suggesting 4,5,2,2,3,3,4,5,2,2,3,3,4,5,2,2,….?

   posted by B on 10-8-2009 at 11:48 am

6. KevinGA: 19 plus 3 would be 22. I came up with the same answer you got, but the pattern should be:

   4, 5, 2, 2, 3, 2, 4, 5, 2, 2, 3, 2…

   posted by Jonny Hammersticks on 10-8-2009 at 11:53 am

7. Ya, I got the same pattern too, sorry Sandy:)

   Recaptcha – indicate Lenin

   posted by Kelly on 10-8-2009 at 4:28 pm

Comment