<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brain Game: L-ementary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/36772/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/36772</link>
	<description>Feel Smart Again</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 12:16:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olympia</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/36772/comment-page-1#comment-272646</link>
		<dc:creator>Olympia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 01:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/?p=36772#comment-272646</guid>
		<description>I think the instructions could have been a bit vaguer. 

No indication whether or not the whole shape is a square. Also, what kind of description is &quot;identically-shaped parts?&quot; Doesn&#039;t a 2 x 6 rectangle and a 4 x 12 identically shaped rectangles, just not the same measurements...maybe I just don&#039;t get the lingo. Odd wording I guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the instructions could have been a bit vaguer. </p>
<p>No indication whether or not the whole shape is a square. Also, what kind of description is &#8220;identically-shaped parts?&#8221; Doesn&#8217;t a 2 x 6 rectangle and a 4 x 12 identically shaped rectangles, just not the same measurements&#8230;maybe I just don&#8217;t get the lingo. Odd wording I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nerak</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/36772/comment-page-1#comment-214398</link>
		<dc:creator>Nerak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 22:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/?p=36772#comment-214398</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad to see so many others came up with 4 triangles and it wasn&#039;t just me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad to see so many others came up with 4 triangles and it wasn&#8217;t just me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/36772/comment-page-1#comment-214196</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 18:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/?p=36772#comment-214196</guid>
		<description>@Betsy,  Similar polygons are polygons for which all corresponding angles are congruent and all corresponding sides are proportional.  Keeping the sides proportional would be a crucial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Betsy,  Similar polygons are polygons for which all corresponding angles are congruent and all corresponding sides are proportional.  Keeping the sides proportional would be a crucial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Betsy</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/36772/comment-page-1#comment-214149</link>
		<dc:creator>Betsy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/?p=36772#comment-214149</guid>
		<description>@Richard... If they&#039;re not similar anyway, is there any reason there couldn&#039;t just be, for instance, three skinny ones and a fat one?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Richard&#8230; If they&#8217;re not similar anyway, is there any reason there couldn&#8217;t just be, for instance, three skinny ones and a fat one?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc in UT</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/36772/comment-page-1#comment-214116</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc in UT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/?p=36772#comment-214116</guid>
		<description>I also came up with the triangle solution. Demonstrates the difference between &quot;similar&quot; and &quot;congruent&quot; quite well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also came up with the triangle solution. Demonstrates the difference between &#8220;similar&#8221; and &#8220;congruent&#8221; quite well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/36772/comment-page-1#comment-214054</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 16:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/?p=36772#comment-214054</guid>
		<description>@Tdl ... I liked the idea so I worked it out.  If the height of the figure is X, than the width of the largest &quot;L&quot; would be 0.1591(X), the next 0.1338(X), the next 0.1125(X) and the last and smallest 0.0946(X).  Of course I rounded to the fourth decimal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Tdl &#8230; I liked the idea so I worked it out.  If the height of the figure is X, than the width of the largest &#8220;L&#8221; would be 0.1591(X), the next 0.1338(X), the next 0.1125(X) and the last and smallest 0.0946(X).  Of course I rounded to the fourth decimal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EAS</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/36772/comment-page-1#comment-214004</link>
		<dc:creator>EAS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 14:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/?p=36772#comment-214004</guid>
		<description>Four right triangles, TL to BR then BL to inner vertex of the &#039;l&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Four right triangles, TL to BR then BL to inner vertex of the &#8216;l&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lugh</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/36772/comment-page-1#comment-213998</link>
		<dc:creator>Lugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 14:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/?p=36772#comment-213998</guid>
		<description>@Tdl - I don&#039;t think you could manage that and actually keep them the same shape.  To be the same shape, the proportions between the sides would have to remain constant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Tdl &#8211; I don&#8217;t think you could manage that and actually keep them the same shape.  To be the same shape, the proportions between the sides would have to remain constant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CH</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/36772/comment-page-1#comment-213966</link>
		<dc:creator>CH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 13:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/?p=36772#comment-213966</guid>
		<description>I also came to the triagle conclusion. In order to make the triangles the same size, you could take the two larger triangles and split them in two in order to make 6 triangles of identical size.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also came to the triagle conclusion. In order to make the triangles the same size, you could take the two larger triangles and split them in two in order to make 6 triangles of identical size.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tdl</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/36772/comment-page-1#comment-213965</link>
		<dc:creator>Tdl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 13:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/?p=36772#comment-213965</guid>
		<description>What about drawing 3 &quot;L&quot;&#039;s inside the shape, facing the same way as the blue &quot;L&quot;?  Again, they all would be the different sizes, but it would work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about drawing 3 &#8220;L&#8221;&#8216;s inside the shape, facing the same way as the blue &#8220;L&#8221;?  Again, they all would be the different sizes, but it would work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

