<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Math explains the &#8220;beer goggles&#8221; effect</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/4001/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/4001</link>
	<description>Feel Smart Again</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:20:58 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: timaree</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/4001/comment-page-1#comment-60107</link>
		<dc:creator>timaree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/4001#comment-60107</guid>
		<description>unfortunately, THIS STUDY WAS A BUNCH OF SHIT and my beloved mentalfloss has been sullied by this reprinting of a myth.

go google &quot;beer goggles science punk&quot; and find that a blogger found the same thing i did: this study never took place, it was an advertising effort of bausch &amp; laum and BBC fell for it. 
i&#039;d include the link but this site won&#039;t let me.

i was taking a course where i had to critque a research study a few years ago and tried to find the original publication of this study. no luck. i tried contacting the researcher. no luck. sure enough, after some searching, i found out the whole thing was shit and some pseudo-scientist had lent his name to this urban fucking legend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>unfortunately, THIS STUDY WAS A BUNCH OF SHIT and my beloved mentalfloss has been sullied by this reprinting of a myth.</p>
<p>go google &#8220;beer goggles science punk&#8221; and find that a blogger found the same thing i did: this study never took place, it was an advertising effort of bausch &amp; laum and BBC fell for it.<br />
i&#8217;d include the link but this site won&#8217;t let me.</p>
<p>i was taking a course where i had to critque a research study a few years ago and tried to find the original publication of this study. no luck. i tried contacting the researcher. no luck. sure enough, after some searching, i found out the whole thing was shit and some pseudo-scientist had lent his name to this urban fucking legend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/4001/comment-page-1#comment-33022</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 16:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/4001#comment-33022</guid>
		<description>Chris is exactly right, this equation is missing the hornyness variable.  Because really that&#039;s what&#039;s driving the intent behind the beer goggles and should control the entire equation.  I would recommend making it an external factor to the equation such as phi and assume the goal is sex once a month and the variable &quot;t&quot; is the number of days until you last had sex.  Then quite simply phi=2t/30.  So the overall effect of beer goggles is phi*Beta.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris is exactly right, this equation is missing the hornyness variable.  Because really that&#8217;s what&#8217;s driving the intent behind the beer goggles and should control the entire equation.  I would recommend making it an external factor to the equation such as phi and assume the goal is sex once a month and the variable &#8220;t&#8221; is the number of days until you last had sex.  Then quite simply phi=2t/30.  So the overall effect of beer goggles is phi*Beta.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/4001/comment-page-1#comment-32809</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 11:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/4001#comment-32809</guid>
		<description>LMAO Blake...you speak the truth my good man.

and Dave...you are still allowed to smoke in bars in some states.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LMAO Blake&#8230;you speak the truth my good man.</p>
<p>and Dave&#8230;you are still allowed to smoke in bars in some states.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/4001/comment-page-1#comment-32789</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 01:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/4001#comment-32789</guid>
		<description>how about the &quot;time passed since you&#039;ve last had sex&quot; variable?  I would think that needs to be taken into consideration</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how about the &#8220;time passed since you&#8217;ve last had sex&#8221; variable?  I would think that needs to be taken into consideration</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/4001/comment-page-1#comment-32725</link>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 05:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/4001#comment-32725</guid>
		<description>the math must have certian limitations becuase evven the ugliest drunkest girls stay away from me</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the math must have certian limitations becuase evven the ugliest drunkest girls stay away from me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blake</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/4001/comment-page-1#comment-32711</link>
		<dc:creator>blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 01:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/4001#comment-32711</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve found it&#039;s easier if i just keep the goggles on</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve found it&#8217;s easier if i just keep the goggles on</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/4001/comment-page-1#comment-32654</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 16:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/4001#comment-32654</guid>
		<description>smokiness in bars?  i haven&#039;t seen smoke in a bar in over two years...try making another excuse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>smokiness in bars?  i haven&#8217;t seen smoke in a bar in over two years&#8230;try making another excuse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Croptilldawn</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/4001/comment-page-1#comment-7663</link>
		<dc:creator>Croptilldawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 16:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/4001#comment-7663</guid>
		<description>So when describing her the next morning do you say...
&quot; but she had a great personality&quot; 
You might have had Beer Goggles on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So when describing her the next morning do you say&#8230;<br />
&#8221; but she had a great personality&#8221;<br />
You might have had Beer Goggles on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
