It occurs to me that between the football and the skinny-dipping, I am probably painting the media retreat I’ve just attended as some sort of hedonistic summer camp. Which it was. But we also took statistics classes while we were there (3.33333 [to infinity] classes per day, to be exact), and so I thought for the next few days I’d share a little of what I learned, starting with this: I’m making you a deal. You have a choice of:
A) A lottery with an 80% chance of winning $4,000 and a 20% chance of winning nada, or
B) $3,000 in cold hard guaranteed cash.
Now, let’s say I’m making you a raw deal instead. You have a choice of:
A) A lottery with an 80% chance of losing $4,000 and a 20% chance of losing nothing, or
B) Giving me $3,000, preferably in small unmarked bills.
Let me know in the comments section which option you’re going with in both cases — people generally answer in a counterintuitive and logically silly way. When we come back from the holiday I’ll explain why….
I’d take the $3000 in the first one and I’d give you $3000 in the second one.
posted by Will on 6-30-2006 at 11:51 am
The first one…hmm… I’ll go with A on that one. Second one, I’ll give you the $3000, so long as Monopoly money is okay.
posted by David on 6-30-2006 at 1:49 pm
People are generally loss-averse so most will choose the guaranteed loss of 3000$ to avoid the likely hit of 4 grand. In the case of the winning money, nothing ventured, nothing gained, something cliche: people will roll the dice for the extra cash cause hey, if you don’t win, you still lose nothing.
posted by Xander on 7-3-2006 at 6:08 am
Gear up for grub with a tripleheader of pigskin, including a meeting of brothers in Dallas. Everybody knows it’s been a rough year for her, but find out who else had issues
posted by Jessica on 11-24-2007 at 8:56 pm