<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor&#8217;s WiFi</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/5274/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/5274</link>
	<description>Feel Smart Again</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 09:46:21 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bhance</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/5274/comment-page-1#comment-11018</link>
		<dc:creator>bhance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 14:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/5274#comment-11018</guid>
		<description>Actually, I don&#039;t believe internet services are considered &#039;utilities&#039; in most states in the sense they are essential &#039;life&#039; services like water, gas, and electricity. Otherwise they&#039;d be regulated as such.

There are certainly worries about open A.P. abuse. The same cases get cited again and again and again ... but fortunately, not everybody out there is a pedophile/music thief/hacker. Most people just need to nab some email now and then and don&#039;t want to pay through the nose for it. 

Instead of pegging the &#039;theft&#039; tag on the process, consider it &#039;borrowing a cup of wifi from the neighbor&#039;.

Also, WEP and WPA won&#039;t necessarily keep a dedicated person from using an available access point. SMWF, at the least, attempts to connect people at both ends of the equation to help foster the process.

-bhance, sharemywifi.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I don&#8217;t believe internet services are considered &#8216;utilities&#8217; in most states in the sense they are essential &#8216;life&#8217; services like water, gas, and electricity. Otherwise they&#8217;d be regulated as such.</p>
<p>There are certainly worries about open A.P. abuse. The same cases get cited again and again and again &#8230; but fortunately, not everybody out there is a pedophile/music thief/hacker. Most people just need to nab some email now and then and don&#8217;t want to pay through the nose for it. </p>
<p>Instead of pegging the &#8216;theft&#8217; tag on the process, consider it &#8216;borrowing a cup of wifi from the neighbor&#8217;.</p>
<p>Also, WEP and WPA won&#8217;t necessarily keep a dedicated person from using an available access point. SMWF, at the least, attempts to connect people at both ends of the equation to help foster the process.</p>
<p>-bhance, sharemywifi.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ransom</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/5274/comment-page-1#comment-11017</link>
		<dc:creator>Ransom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 14:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/5274#comment-11017</guid>
		<description>Tom, I wish you were right.  But here&#039;s a BBC article about two people who were arrested for &quot;hijacking&quot; wifi ...

news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/hereford/worcs/6565079.stm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, I wish you were right.  But here&#8217;s a BBC article about two people who were arrested for &#8220;hijacking&#8221; wifi &#8230;</p>
<p>news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/hereford/worcs/6565079.stm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandy</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/5274/comment-page-1#comment-11014</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 14:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/5274#comment-11014</guid>
		<description>Sorry, Tom, but it&#039;s not an urban legend. Using someone else&#039;s wi-fi system without permission does NOT fall in the realm of &quot;accessing an electronic communication.&quot; What is being stolen in these cases is not a communication, but a utility. 

It is a theft of service, just as if your neighbor tapped into your gas line or your cable hook-up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, Tom, but it&#8217;s not an urban legend. Using someone else&#8217;s wi-fi system without permission does NOT fall in the realm of &#8220;accessing an electronic communication.&#8221; What is being stolen in these cases is not a communication, but a utility. </p>
<p>It is a theft of service, just as if your neighbor tapped into your gas line or your cable hook-up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/5274/comment-page-1#comment-11005</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 21:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/5274#comment-11005</guid>
		<description>Dear Mentalfloss,

Do not spread urban legends. Especially about the law. You are not qualified to hold an opinion. And your rule about not allowing links (at least to GOV sites)in messages is dumb.

Unencrypted wireless is legal

According to Title 18 (Crimes and criminal
procedure) of the United States Code, Part I
(Crimes), Chapter 119 (Wire and electronic
communications interception and interception of oral
communications) from

2511. (2)(g) It shall not be unlawful under this
chapter

(i) to intercept or access an electronic
communication made through an electronic
communication system that is configured so that such
electronic communication is readily accessible to
the general public;

2510. Definitions
(16) &quot;readily accessible to the general public&quot;
means, with respect to a radio communication, that
such communication is not --

(A) scrambled or encrypted ;

(B) transmitted using modulation techniques whose
essential parameters have been withheld from the
public with the intention of preserving the privacy
of such communication;

(C) carried on a subcarrier or other signal
subsidiary to a radio transmission;

(D) transmitted over a communication system provided
by a common carrier, unless the communication is a
tone only paging system communication; or

(E) transmitted on frequencies allocated under part
25
subpart D
E
or F
of part 74
or part 94 of the
Rules of the Federal Communications Commission
unless, in the
case of a communication transmitted on a frequency
allocated under part 74
that is not exclusively allocated to broadcast
auxiliary services, the communication is a two-way
voice communication by radio; [The unlicensed
spectrum used by Wi-Fi is ruled by
part 15</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Mentalfloss,</p>
<p>Do not spread urban legends. Especially about the law. You are not qualified to hold an opinion. And your rule about not allowing links (at least to GOV sites)in messages is dumb.</p>
<p>Unencrypted wireless is legal</p>
<p>According to Title 18 (Crimes and criminal<br />
procedure) of the United States Code, Part I<br />
(Crimes), Chapter 119 (Wire and electronic<br />
communications interception and interception of oral<br />
communications) from</p>
<p>2511. (2)(g) It shall not be unlawful under this<br />
chapter</p>
<p>(i) to intercept or access an electronic<br />
communication made through an electronic<br />
communication system that is configured so that such<br />
electronic communication is readily accessible to<br />
the general public;</p>
<p>2510. Definitions<br />
(16) &#8220;readily accessible to the general public&#8221;<br />
means, with respect to a radio communication, that<br />
such communication is not &#8211;</p>
<p>(A) scrambled or encrypted ;</p>
<p>(B) transmitted using modulation techniques whose<br />
essential parameters have been withheld from the<br />
public with the intention of preserving the privacy<br />
of such communication;</p>
<p>(C) carried on a subcarrier or other signal<br />
subsidiary to a radio transmission;</p>
<p>(D) transmitted over a communication system provided<br />
by a common carrier, unless the communication is a<br />
tone only paging system communication; or</p>
<p>(E) transmitted on frequencies allocated under part<br />
25<br />
subpart D<br />
E<br />
or F<br />
of part 74<br />
or part 94 of the<br />
Rules of the Federal Communications Commission<br />
unless, in the<br />
case of a communication transmitted on a frequency<br />
allocated under part 74<br />
that is not exclusively allocated to broadcast<br />
auxiliary services, the communication is a two-way<br />
voice communication by radio; [The unlicensed<br />
spectrum used by Wi-Fi is ruled by<br />
part 15</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CropTillDawn</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/5274/comment-page-1#comment-10710</link>
		<dc:creator>CropTillDawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 20:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/5274#comment-10710</guid>
		<description>My city was one of the first to install a free WiFi system unfortunately it only works within a half mile or is it an one mile radius? Either way our house is just out of range :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My city was one of the first to install a free WiFi system unfortunately it only works within a half mile or is it an one mile radius? Either way our house is just out of range :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sma</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/5274/comment-page-1#comment-10674</link>
		<dc:creator>sma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 16:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/5274#comment-10674</guid>
		<description>I have a &quot;if you dont want me on it, you should lock it&quot; attitude towards wifi. I live in NYC, and it&#039;s very easy to pick up 7 or 8 signals at once. I DO pay for my own, and I have a WEP key on it so others cannot easily abuse it. But I&#039;m simply not always at home where my own network is in range. 

If my neighbor came to me and said &quot;I&#039;ll split the cost with you if you give me your password&quot; I&#039;d accept in a second. Wifi as a technology is still evolving, but moreover, wifi as a business concept is still very young.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a &#8220;if you dont want me on it, you should lock it&#8221; attitude towards wifi. I live in NYC, and it&#8217;s very easy to pick up 7 or 8 signals at once. I DO pay for my own, and I have a WEP key on it so others cannot easily abuse it. But I&#8217;m simply not always at home where my own network is in range. </p>
<p>If my neighbor came to me and said &#8220;I&#8217;ll split the cost with you if you give me your password&#8221; I&#8217;d accept in a second. Wifi as a technology is still evolving, but moreover, wifi as a business concept is still very young.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antik</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/5274/comment-page-1#comment-10662</link>
		<dc:creator>Antik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 09:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/5274#comment-10662</guid>
		<description>WiFi is great but what&#039;s more serviceable and better defends from laptop junkies?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WiFi is great but what&#8217;s more serviceable and better defends from laptop junkies?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alison</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/5274/comment-page-1#comment-10654</link>
		<dc:creator>Alison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 23:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/5274#comment-10654</guid>
		<description>My city is infusing free WiFi in all of the downtown area. I can only hope that it takes off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My city is infusing free WiFi in all of the downtown area. I can only hope that it takes off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
