
Computer Beach Party was released in 1987, and by all accounts, it was an awful, awful movie. IMDB’s plot summary reads:
Greedy locals are trying to turn some beach property into a tourist attraction, and a computer expert sets out to use is knowledge of computers–along with the help of several local “beach bunnies”–to stop them.
Digital archivist (and filmmaker) Jason Scott saw the movie recently, and decided to dig into its history. Why is it so bad? Why is all the dialog dubbed so badly? Why is there a talking dog in one scene? Why are there so many computers in the movie? Scott pieced together the answers and even managed to interview the director, writing up the whole story in an epic two-part blog entry: Part One and Part Two. Here’s a snippet from part one:
…I must make clear: this movie is awful. Â Not just awful like “missed the mark” awful, or awful like “didn’t feel very well made” awful. I mean that it’s functionally broken, full of inconsistencies, utilizes a plot that wouldn’t have worked even if filmed to perfection, and wastes your time. It actually wastes your time. The fact it has computers in it, for me, meant that there were periods of dim interest, like finding out the person who kidnapped and is beating you went to the same college as you did. Interesting, yet besides the point. It is absolutely terrible. Don’t see it, unless you’re attending the aforementioned Found Footage Festival, at which point you will have a great time, because you will be watching a show that’s funny and well-done, which contains this awful thing at the core of it to power the we’re-all-in-this-together feeling with other members of the audience.
Scott’s investigation uncovers a lot of interesting stuff about this movie — how and why it was made, how it ended up being owned by the reputable studio Lion’s Gate, what happened to the various people involved. I don’t think it’s a spoiler to tell you that the female lead now has a black belt in karate and the male lead is now a drama teacher.
Read Jason Scott’s analysis of Computer Beach Party for a fun romp through a truly awful film. (Don’t forget part two, an interview with the director.)
The real question is: Is it worse then “Manos Hands of Fate”? (in all honestly I didn’t think that movie was that bad, I’ve seen worse, oh like Life Aquatic)
posted by nihil on 5-12-2010 at 12:08 pm
Maybe the movie’s not so bad…Think about it..
How many movies motivate you to investigate like this one? Or even appear on mentalfloss? lol
Or maybe it was so awful that it made you start liking it? Sort of a love hate thing.
Just an idea…
posted by all Romeo on 5-12-2010 at 12:18 pm
@all Romeo – admit it, you are the auteur behind Computer Beach Party!
posted by Chris Higgins on 5-12-2010 at 12:19 pm
I want to see this now…
Maybe we’ll put it in our bad movie queue, right after Mega Piranha and Snakehead Terror.
posted by Kes Wold on 5-12-2010 at 12:39 pm
I watched “Tiptoes” at the anti-recommendation of Cracked. I found it delightfully awful. Maybe I need to see this one, too.
posted by Dave on 5-12-2010 at 3:12 pm
The Found Footage Festival website is GREAT! Thanks for sending me there!
posted by Kelsey on 5-12-2010 at 3:40 pm
Here’s the scary part, it’s available on amazon.com
posted by PartiallyDeflected on 5-12-2010 at 11:56 pm
two other hilarious terrible movies
Hard Ticket to Hawaii
Birdemic: Shock and Terror
WARNING
Hard TIcket to Hawaii has rampant nudity
They are awesomely bad
Birdemic seems like it was made by a 7th grader and is basically the birds only terrible.
Hard Ticket was mentioned on mental floss
posted by Henry on 5-13-2010 at 8:00 am
I was in said movie, and the reason the dubs were so bad for my character was that they chose not to fly me out to LA from Houston for the over dubs. They went with a different talent. They went from small budget to no budget very quickly.
posted by jeff Wurthmann on 2-4-2011 at 12:23 pm