<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dumb questions with smart answers #23: Why is space dark?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/7811/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/7811</link>
	<description>Feel Smart Again</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 05:18:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: em</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/7811/comment-page-1#comment-124791</link>
		<dc:creator>em</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 09:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/7811#comment-124791</guid>
		<description>very interesting!

but this is what makes my brain almost short circuit-

so the universe is still expanding, so the space that the universe inhabits is even bigger...but what&#039;s containing *that* space?

like- where is all of this stuff being held, and how could just infinite space exist?
makes me think of all the ancient myths about nothing but Chaos existing, and from Chaos came the gods.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very interesting!</p>
<p>but this is what makes my brain almost short circuit-</p>
<p>so the universe is still expanding, so the space that the universe inhabits is even bigger&#8230;but what&#8217;s containing *that* space?</p>
<p>like- where is all of this stuff being held, and how could just infinite space exist?<br />
makes me think of all the ancient myths about nothing but Chaos existing, and from Chaos came the gods.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/7811/comment-page-1#comment-124564</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 15:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/7811#comment-124564</guid>
		<description>Astrophysicist here: 
your answer is basically correct except for one thing: the Universe is not necessarily finite in extent.  There&#039;s no way to know.  We DO know that it&#039;s bigger than the horizon (the total distance light could travel since the Big Bang).  There&#039;s just no way to prove that it&#039;s infinite or finite if there&#039;s no way to see outside this horizon.  Thankfully, the solution to Olber&#039;s paradox doesn&#039;t depend on this point.  The age of the Universe and redshift are good enough by themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Astrophysicist here:<br />
your answer is basically correct except for one thing: the Universe is not necessarily finite in extent.  There&#8217;s no way to know.  We DO know that it&#8217;s bigger than the horizon (the total distance light could travel since the Big Bang).  There&#8217;s just no way to prove that it&#8217;s infinite or finite if there&#8217;s no way to see outside this horizon.  Thankfully, the solution to Olber&#8217;s paradox doesn&#8217;t depend on this point.  The age of the Universe and redshift are good enough by themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/7811/comment-page-1#comment-124556</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 14:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/7811#comment-124556</guid>
		<description>Thank you William in Boston-- your remarks regarding the finality of the universe are quite on point.  To expand on it:
The assumption by physicists that the universe is finite is more a relic of conservation of mass than anything else-- if the &quot;big bang&quot; theory is correct, then scientists make the assumption that the original element of the big bang must have had a finite mass.  However, things we &quot;knew&quot; to be true have not proven to be &quot;universal&quot; (pun INTENDED), especially regarding Newton&#039;s laws, which have lost a lot of meaning in terms of &quot;space&quot; and the atomic level since Einstein&#039;s theory of relativity.
Besides that, the possibility that space is not finite (i.e. infinite) has an infinite amount of possible (not necessarily plausible) explanations, but that&#039;s another conversation.
This page reminds me of those binge-drunk conversations my fellow engineers and I used to have regarding space&#039;s finality, like, &quot;if the universe is infinite, then is there someone somewhere doing the exact same thing and talking about the exact same topic as us right now?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you William in Boston&#8211; your remarks regarding the finality of the universe are quite on point.  To expand on it:<br />
The assumption by physicists that the universe is finite is more a relic of conservation of mass than anything else&#8211; if the &#8220;big bang&#8221; theory is correct, then scientists make the assumption that the original element of the big bang must have had a finite mass.  However, things we &#8220;knew&#8221; to be true have not proven to be &#8220;universal&#8221; (pun INTENDED), especially regarding Newton&#8217;s laws, which have lost a lot of meaning in terms of &#8220;space&#8221; and the atomic level since Einstein&#8217;s theory of relativity.<br />
Besides that, the possibility that space is not finite (i.e. infinite) has an infinite amount of possible (not necessarily plausible) explanations, but that&#8217;s another conversation.<br />
This page reminds me of those binge-drunk conversations my fellow engineers and I used to have regarding space&#8217;s finality, like, &#8220;if the universe is infinite, then is there someone somewhere doing the exact same thing and talking about the exact same topic as us right now?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dummy</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/7811/comment-page-1#comment-124542</link>
		<dc:creator>Dummy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 13:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/7811#comment-124542</guid>
		<description>is the universe is expanding, what is it expanding into? what is on the other side...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is the universe is expanding, what is it expanding into? what is on the other side&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vickey</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/7811/comment-page-1#comment-124538</link>
		<dc:creator>Vickey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 11:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/7811#comment-124538</guid>
		<description>I just have trouble imagining space being infinite. It&#039;s hard to wrap my head around the idea that space is not some actual finite space.  I think of space like a huge room, and what&#039;s outside surrounding the room? I&#039;ve thought about that for years, and it still blows my little pea-brain away...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just have trouble imagining space being infinite. It&#8217;s hard to wrap my head around the idea that space is not some actual finite space.  I think of space like a huge room, and what&#8217;s outside surrounding the room? I&#8217;ve thought about that for years, and it still blows my little pea-brain away&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maumau</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/7811/comment-page-1#comment-28710</link>
		<dc:creator>maumau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 01:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/7811#comment-28710</guid>
		<description>hey the universe isn&#039;t dark....
there are things which is hidden from our eye sight as our retina can&#039;t be focus all the things to our brain. 
 Besides is all under gravity control.
No gravity, no life exist!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey the universe isn&#8217;t dark&#8230;.<br />
there are things which is hidden from our eye sight as our retina can&#8217;t be focus all the things to our brain.<br />
 Besides is all under gravity control.<br />
No gravity, no life exist!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WUGGY6X9</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/7811/comment-page-1#comment-28682</link>
		<dc:creator>WUGGY6X9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 19:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/7811#comment-28682</guid>
		<description>The amazining universe.I just can&#039;t get enough of it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The amazining universe.I just can&#8217;t get enough of it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: t</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/7811/comment-page-1#comment-28659</link>
		<dc:creator>t</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 17:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/7811#comment-28659</guid>
		<description>if there are so many objects in space, it would stand to reason that millions of objects are behind other objects.  so a star we see in the sky could have hundreds, thousands or millions of objects behind it &quot;blocking&quot; that light.  

when the planet moves, stars become visible while others go away from sight.  the ones that become visible then have other stars behind it that become non-visible.  and this is only in a 2d plane since that is our way of &quot;seeing&quot; objects.  we cant look around an object 50 million light years away until the planet moves to a different angle, which then blocks more.  etc etc etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if there are so many objects in space, it would stand to reason that millions of objects are behind other objects.  so a star we see in the sky could have hundreds, thousands or millions of objects behind it &#8220;blocking&#8221; that light.  </p>
<p>when the planet moves, stars become visible while others go away from sight.  the ones that become visible then have other stars behind it that become non-visible.  and this is only in a 2d plane since that is our way of &#8220;seeing&#8221; objects.  we cant look around an object 50 million light years away until the planet moves to a different angle, which then blocks more.  etc etc etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PM Toone</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/7811/comment-page-1#comment-23634</link>
		<dc:creator>PM Toone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 13:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/7811#comment-23634</guid>
		<description>Dumb questions with smart answers #23: Why is space dark? 

Dumb answer: Lack of light.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dumb questions with smart answers #23: Why is space dark? </p>
<p>Dumb answer: Lack of light.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheralyn</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/7811/comment-page-1#comment-23602</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheralyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 23:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/7811#comment-23602</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve often wondered if the &quot;Big Bang&quot; was only one of a succession of Big Bangs...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve often wondered if the &#8220;Big Bang&#8221; was only one of a succession of Big Bangs&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

