by Michael Ridgeway

At 1,456 pages, War and Peace makes a big impression … and a great doorstop. But books don’t have to weigh a lot to be heavy hitters. Here are seven tiny tomes—all fewer than 100 pages—that sparked revolutions.
In the 1770s, American colonists were riding the fence. Should they cut ties with the tax-happy King George or just sit around drinking English tea? As they waffled, a penniless Brit named Thomas Paine sailed to Philadelphia and published the incendiary tract Common Sense.
Released in 1776, Paine’s text lambasted King George as a “crowned ruffian” and the progeny of a “French bastard.” The language struck a nerve, turning loyalists into patriots and nudging the likes of George Washington and John Adams into action. Less than six months later, the colonies declared independence, and the Revolutionary War was on. As for Paine, he went on to write another powerful little book, The Age of Reason, a deist work that criticized organized religion and questioned the authenticity of the Bible. This time, however, Paine’s words missed the mark. He was condemned as an atheist, shunned by friends, and denied citizenship in the United States—the young nation he helped create.
Written in 1957 for children learning to read, The Cat in the Hat has saved generations of first-graders from the mind-numbing adventures of Dick and Jane. Instead of seeing Dick run and Jane pet Spot, kids got to watch as a free-spirited, umbrella-toting cat stood on a ball, juggled goldfish, and generally encouraged chaos. Dr. Seuss spent a year and a half working on The Cat in the Hat; apparently, it’s not so easy to write a rollicking good tale with a vocabulary of only 236 words. Incredibly, just 15 words in the book are more than one syllable long.
A how-to manual for aspiring dictators, The Prince is one of the most reviled, and most studied, political treatises in history. First published in 1532, the book gave rise to the idea that a ruler’s first duty is to build a strong and stable state, no matter what the cost. The Prince inspired numerous tyrants, including Oliver Cromwell, Hitler, and Mussolini. Stalin was particularly moved by the book, scribbling copious notes in the margins of his copy.
If Machiavelli helped unleash tyranny on the world, then Thoreau taught the world how to fight back. His ideas were simple but revolutionary: Don’t obey evil laws, and don’t pay taxes to the governments that create them. Thoreau penned the essay collection in 1849, inspired by his disgust over issues such as slavery and the Mexican-American War. But few paid attention to Civil Disobedience during Thoreau’s lifetime. That wouldn’t happen until six decades later, when Gandhi came across the work while studying at Oxford and took a copy with him to South Africa. There, he and his followers used Thoreau’s ideas to launch a campaign of passive resistance against the government, later repeating those tactics in India. Civil Disobedience has been on the march ever since, toppling colonialism, segregation, apartheid, and all manner of injustice.
For nearly a century, this pithy little grammar book has taught Americans how to write. Along the way, it’s won over the hearts and minds of countless English teachers, copyeditors, and authors, from Dorothy Parker to Stephen King. First published by Strunk in 1918, the manual took on a new life in 1959 when author E.B. White was brought on board to revise and expand it. (The co-authored version exceeded 100 pages.) But the book’s key lessons have always remained the same: encouraging writers to be clear, use concrete language, and omit needless words. Surprisingly, the little rulebook has also inspired other forms of expression, including a ballet of the same name by choreographer Matthew Nash. Not everyone agreed with Nash’s interpretation, though. One reviewer panned the choreography as too indecisive, claiming it failed to distinguish between the active and passive voice.
Despite the title’s promise, most of this ancient Chinese handbook is about how to win a conflict without needing to fight. Sun Tzu was a military general 2,500 years ago, but he was also a Taoist philosopher who believed in getting to know your enemy and cultivating a peaceful state of mind. For this reason, The Art of War is studied not only by military strategists, but also by business executives, diplomats, and lawyers. The list of people influenced by the book is impressive: Napoleon, Chairman Mao, Donald Trump, and of course, Gordon Gekko, Michael Douglas’ character in 1987’s Wall Street, who quotes Sun Tzu continuously throughout the movie.
Europe’s emerging communist movement was getting no respect in the mid-1800s, so it asked two good friends, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, to do what communists do best—write propaganda. The resulting manifesto recast history as one giant class struggle and outlined a 10-point program for building a communist state. The booklet climaxed with the rousing motto, “Workers of the world, unite!” About 40 years later, those words stirred the heart of young Vladimir Lenin, who led the Bolshevik Revolution and helped create the Soviet Union. What followed was a series of unfortunate events, including the nuclear arms race, the Vietnam War, and, of course, Rocky IV.
This article originally appeared in mental_floss magazine. If you’re in a subscribing mood, here are the details. Got an iPad? We also offer digital subscriptions through Zinio.
More from mental_floss…
10 Works of Literature That Were Really Hard to Write
*
Try, Try Again: Rejection Letters Received by Bestselling Authors
*
WTF? Initials That Meant More Than They Realized
*
Oh, the Places Your Ashes Will Go!
*
10 Buildings Shaped Like What They Sell
My favorite small book (although more than 100 pages – 144 to be exact) is “How to Lie With Statistics” by Darrell Huff Amazon: http://www.amazon.com/How-Lie-Statistics-Darrell-Huff/dp/0393310728 , which I originally found in a school library when looking for a short book to do a book report on. Designed to be a warning of the ways statistics can be manipulated (and written way back in 1954) it has not been out of print since. Sadly, too many of its readers have apparently been using it as a real “How To” book, since its methods are even more common today.
posted by Craig Wittler on 1-2-2011 at 12:33 am
An honorable mention for “Green Eggs & Ham”: it used only 50 words, supposedly because his publisher bet him he couldn’t write a book using only 50 words or less.
posted by Paul M. on 1-2-2011 at 12:47 am
“The Prince” was not intended to be taken as a ‘how-to manual’ at all. Machiavelli meant it to be a tongue-in-cheek assessment of the tyrannical ruling style of the powerful Medici family (I think I read somewhere that he had his legs or his hands broken for his efforts, I can’t remember which, but since he was a writer it was probably his hands.) Unfortunately, if you’re reading the book from the point of view of a dictator, the book offers pretty sound advice, and so history remembers it as a guide for rulers with a mean streak. Funny how things work out like that sometimes…it makes me wonder how books from our time will be interpreted by future generations :)
posted by sammylee on 1-2-2011 at 4:14 am
I believe that “Everybody Poops” is under 100 pages. How dare you neglect it. Quick, name another book title with “poop” in it. That’s right, you can’t. That’s how powerful it is. Put the poop in the list, after “common sense” would be fitting.
posted by Seymour on 1-2-2011 at 9:13 am
“For nearly a century, this pithy little grammar book has taught Americans how to write poorly.”
FTFY.
Ugh, Strunk and White. What awful things it’s done to English.
I’ll let a linguist talk about it: http://chronicle.com/article/50-Years-of-Stupid-Grammar/25497
posted by Michael Akerman on 1-2-2011 at 9:41 am
I’m with sammylee.
http://www.online-literature.com/machiavelli/
posted by beth on 1-2-2011 at 10:23 am
Machiavelli was forced to write The Prince by the ruling family at the time. He was imprisoned and tortured until he agreed to write a book that praised a ruling monarchy. All of his other writings praise free republics. The Prince is a satire of the way European monarchies ruled, not a guide book.
posted by Bryce on 1-2-2011 at 12:28 pm
Best line of the whole article:
What followed was a series of unfortunate events, including the nuclear arms race, the Vietnam War, and, of course, Rocky IV.
I’m especially glad you included the nuclear arms race with the fiascoes that were the Vietnam War and Rocky IV.
posted by Tim S. on 1-2-2011 at 4:14 pm
Michael: thanks for that great link to the chronicle article about the ridiculous grammar book. I particularly liked the part about active v. passive voice. Somebody needs to tell the idiots who wrote the Army Regulation dealing with memo writing. I hate when my bosses return a memo for rewrite citing an incorrect reg. Blarg. Just because it’s in a reg doesn’t make it right.
How are the nuclear arms race and the Vietnam War “unfortunate?” Global security and stopping the communist holocaust in SE Asia (until the politicians gave up on us) apparently are bad things. Hm.
posted by Ryan on 1-2-2011 at 5:20 pm
Seymour – that’s a title that should belong on every new parent’s bookshelf, and I give one to every new Daddy that I know. As a wise man once said… sh*t happens! Which end is the snake’s behind? What does whale poop look like?
posted by Mare on 1-3-2011 at 4:56 am
It never ceases to amaze me when readers (apparently not _flossers because they would get the joke) comment on a statement as ridiculous as – What followed was a series of unfortunate events, including the nuclear arms race, the Vietnam War, and, of course, Rocky IV. Of course the arms race was more than just unfortunate, and Rocky IV, well, if you don’t get the joke, Drago will break you. Ha. Thanks for making me giggle this morning at least.
posted by Cyndi on 1-3-2011 at 11:39 am
@Ryan Shouldn’t all wars and weapons of mass destruction be labeled as unfortunate. Regardless of outcome or goal, war is a terrible thing and should always be consider as such. The nuclear arms race has little to do with global security considering that using said weapons would destroy the planet.
posted by hockeyzombie on 1-3-2011 at 1:50 pm
‘Unfortunate’ — an excellent choice of words.
To a true warrior, any war is unfortunate — if only because it shows that the warrior, by some fault in his preparation, diligence or diplomacy (see the “Art of War” for more on this) failed to prevent it.
Clauswitz — “War is diplomacy by other means” — clearly was wrong. Just consider how the countries who have used Clauswitz ideas on war have fared (Germany, 1914; Germany, 1939; Japan, 1935; USA, 2002).
War is evidence of failure, and failure is always unfortunate. True warriors know that, intimately.
posted by EgoNemo on 1-4-2011 at 1:57 pm