mental_floss magazine
SUBSCRIBE >
GIFT SUBSCRIPTIONS >
DIGITAL SUBSCRIPTIONS >
subscriber services >
1. The Cold Shoulder
Believe it or not, there was a time when giving someone the cold shoulder didn’t just mean publicly snubbing them, it actually meant handing them a cold shoulder, as in a cold shoulder of beef. During the Middle Ages, the easiest way to hint to guests that they’d overstayed their welcome was to serve them a heaping mound of cold cow parts. A few platters of nothing but shoulder were supposed to drive away even the most persistent of guests.
2. Humble Pie
In the 13th Century, British families tended to divvy up food after a hunt by giving priority (and the best portions of meat) to the man who shot the stag, his eldest son and his closest male friends. Those of lesser importance, like the man’s wife, his remaining children and the family of his friends for example, were graciously gifted the umbles (a.k.a. the heart, the brain, the tongue, the kidneys and the entrails). Coating these scraps in seasoning and then baking them into a piecrust made the umbles a little more appetizing, but not much, apparently. Years after the delicacy was discontinued, some punster added an “h” to the phrase, and “to eat humble pie” became synonymous with an embarrassing drop in social status, then generalized as any sort of humiliation.
3. Take the cake
Lifted from Southern black lingo, the phrase originated at cakewalk contests, where individuals would strut their stuff to the audience’s delight. The owner of the most imaginative swagger would take home first prize, which was always a cake. While “take the cake” became standard English, some of the fancier cakewalk motions became standard parts of tap dance.
4. Bringin’ home the bacon
What today means coming home with a wad of cash used to be a bit more literal. In the 12th Century, the Dunmow church in Essex County, Britain, began awarding salted and cured bacon strips to newly married couples if they could swear after one year of marriage that they had never once regretted the decision. Standards got a little stiffer in the 16th Century, however, when the church turned the event into a competition: Couples had to appear before a jury of six bachelors and bachelorettes and plead the magnitude of their happiness in order to “bring home the bacon.”
“Eating crow”, “Gone to pot” and much more, all covered after the jump…
5. Gone to pot
The common phrase for something that’s fallen apart or disintegrated goes back to the 16th Century, basically in reference to things that were actually going into the pot. While the chopping and stewing of meats and vegetables definitely illustrates its colloquial usage, “gone to pot” evolved into a 17th-Century euphemism for those who’d fallen victim to cannibals.
6. To eat crow
This saying, which means to humiliate oneself, has a pretty amusing legend behind it. During a truce in the war of 1812, a New Englander ventured over to the British camp to do some hunting. Frustrated by the lack of wild game, he decided to shoot the first thing he saw—a crow, which he nailed. A British officer, hearing the gunshot, decided to punish the American for trespassing, but since he was unarmed he used a bit of cunning. The Brit complimented the American on his aim and then asked to see the fine weapon with which the damage was done. The unsuspecting Yank handed over the weapon, after which the British officer turned it on the American, berated him and ordered him to eat a bite of the crow he’d killed. After a bit of useless begging, the American complied. The officer then gave the gun back and told the American to go home. But before the Brit could leave, the bitter Yank quickly turned the gun on the officer and forced him to eat the rest of the bird.
The tale would have gone unknown, except that the infuriated British officer went the next day to the American camp, demanding retribution. After hearing the tale, the U.S. commanding officer had the soldier brought to him and asked him if he’d seen this Englishmen before. After several attempts to respond, the soldier managed to stutter, “W-why y-y-yes, Captain, I d-d-dined with him y-y-yesterday.”
7. A real ham
The common term for someone guilty of overacting is abbreviated from the slightly longer, and more offensive, hamfatter. Low-grade minstrel actors often didn’t have the cash to spring for cold cream, so they resorted to applying ham fat to their faces before they put their make-up on. The fat was a viable substitute as it made removing makeup after a gig a whole lot easier. Consequently, the facial application became permanently connected to the actors who wore it.
8. Pleased as punch
The punch in the phrase doesn’t refer to a tasty beverage, but instead to the main character in the old time “Punch and Judy” puppet shows. A staple at European carnivals, the Punch and Judy show was madly popular in the days before TV. The humorous puppet act always ended in a pleased Punch outwitting his shrewish wife, hence the phrase.
9. A Bakers’ Dozen
Bakers of old weren’t exactly the most ethical creatures. In fact, it was pretty well known that bakers used to dupe customers regularly by making loaves of bread that contained more air pockets than solid material. By 1266, Parliament was fed up (or not fed up, as it were) with their airy substitutes, so they enacted a law where bread had to be sold by weight. Most bakers didn’t have the proper weighing equipment, but the penalties were pretty extreme. Bakers quickly decided that forking over an extra loaf for every dozen was an easy way to avoid a sentence: hence the number 13.
–note: This article was lifted from mental_floss’ Saints and Sinners Issue. Be sure to check out our online store to purchase this or other back issues.
i would love to know the origins of the commonly used sports term “wood shed beating”. thanks. JB
posted by jon brumbaugh on 10-3-2007 at 10:39 am
thanks so much! I am a speech language pathologist who teaches teenagers with language deficits. We often talk about idioms, and how figurative language can’t be taken literally. My students will have great fun with this entry.
posted by chris on 10-3-2007 at 11:23 am
My guess for “Wood shed beating” would be derived from being punished for an especially egregious offense by your Dad. He would take you to the wood shed and hit you with a switch.
Just my guess.
posted by Dusty on 10-3-2007 at 12:27 pm
Re: Wood shed beating– My grampa grew up in rural Ohio in a “spare the rod and spoil the child”- type family and when he misbehaved as a child, he’d be marched by his father behind the wood shed- where the smaller sticks not really useful for firewood were kept- and pick out a “switch” with which he’d be spanked. Thus, he refers to getting yelled at by my grandmother or losing a game badly as being “taken to the wood shed”. Maybe other families did it too?
Interesting side note: having to choose your own switch was considered a way to add insult to injury, as well as a strategy issue- if he chose one that was too big, it would hurt more, but if he chose one too small, it was more likely to break– and then he’d have to choose another and start over again. At least he wasn’t spoiled…
posted by Christin on 10-3-2007 at 12:38 pm
Christin,
Just the opposite is true about the size of the switch. Given the choice, a child being punished would be allowed to choose the switch to be used. Usually the smaller, thinner switch would be chosen because it looked like it would hurt less. Didn’t take too many trips to the woodshed to learn the physics of what caused which branch to form a more lasting impression! I’m old enough to have been there, done that on the receiving end. Ah, yes! I remember it well. My first lesson in physics. And I grew up just fine, thank you. :-)
posted by Steve S on 10-3-2007 at 2:32 pm
Not a terribly common phrase, but I’ve heard it enough that I am curious: What the heck is the origin of “Let’s blow this popsicle stand”? or alternately, “let’s blow this pop stand”? Anybody? Anybody? Beuller? Beuller?
posted by Luis on 10-3-2007 at 7:03 pm
alternately, you would learn if doing somethign stupid resulted in a switching you would quickly endevour to be the best behaved child ever. lol
i figured out real quick that i wasn’t sneaky enough to escape punishment so i just stopped doing things unless i was dead sure i could get away with it. lol
unfortunately my brother and sister weren’t that smart and kept getting there butts smacked because they wouldn’t behave.
or does that make you sneakier? hmm.
posted by Sue on 10-3-2007 at 9:03 pm
As one who experienced first-hand the whole “bring me a switch” process, I can assure those lucky enough to escape it that a thin branch was by no means the better choice. A thinner branch cut through the air faster, ensuring a mighty sting and a more powerful stroke. (Just as bad as “go get me a belt”.) I caught on VERY quickly, but I ahd two brothers and a sister who just never seemed to get it….so they continued to get it ;)
‘course, as a parent now- I find this idea absolutely horrific- the mental aspects alone break my heart. I’ve managed to raise 5 kids so far without having to wallop any of them with a freakin’ TREE. …and my parents wonder why we have issues…..
posted by sandy on 10-3-2007 at 9:38 pm
If having gotten a spanking with a “switch” or belt is the worst issue you have had to deal with then you have led a charmed life indeed.
posted by cpowell on 10-4-2007 at 5:20 am
I love the stories behind idioms, but what are your sources? Are you sure of the accuracy?
The last time my dad hit me, he punched me in the jaw.
posted by Bassman on 10-4-2007 at 6:37 am
Re: Bringing Home the Bacon.
You may be delighted to know that the Dunmow Flitch trials still take place, the next one in 2008. The applications from suitably blissfully wed couples have just started to be accepted by the Flitch Committee.
Michael Boyton, journalist, Dunmow Broadcast, Breat Dunmow, Essex, UK.
posted by Michael Boyton on 10-5-2007 at 6:09 am
A lesson in physics never saved me. We lived in Mississippi at the time and when I had to pick a switch it came from the willow tree…
posted by E to the M on 10-5-2007 at 1:28 pm