mental_floss magazine
SUBSCRIBE >
GIFT SUBSCRIPTIONS >
DIGITAL SUBSCRIPTIONS >
subscriber services >

From Michael Stusser’s terrific new book The Dead Guy Interviews (available here). Oh, and be sure to read his introduction in the post below…
Charles Darwin’s Belated Obituary
February 12, 1809 – April 19, 1882Charles Robert Darwin was a British naturalist with a radical new theory about where we came from. Darwin attended Edinburgh University in 1825 and studied medicine. His attention soon moved to naturalism, and he began learning about evolution and acquired characteristics under Robert Edmund Grant.
It was a trip aboard the HMS Beagle in 1831 at the age of 22 that allowed Darwin to circumnavigate the world and develop hands-on hypotheses while encountering flora, tropical rainforests, fossils and untamed civilizations.
His theory of evolution by natural selection, The Origin of Species, was published in 1859 (twenty years after his voyage) and laid out the argument that the traits of living organisms change from one generation to the next, and include the emergence of new species over time. The theory rocked the world, and changed the way we saw ourselves. The possibility now existed that human beings no longer originated from Divine design, but shared a common ancestry with animals! Men from monkeys! Goodness gracious!
Right or wrong, Darwin’s greatest accomplishment was to begin the debate and move the concept of evolution into the realm of serious scientific thought. He died at the age of 73, and was buried at Westminster Abbey, London, a rare honor for a scientist.
Michael Stusser: How’d you get into the whole field of naturalism?Charles Darwin: Like many youngsters, I used to collect stuff: coins and birds’ eggs and rocks and flowers.
MS: I had a baseball card collection. Didn’t give me any grand theories on the world, though.
CD: Well then I got into shooting game, which was damn fun. Brilliant, really. Started looking at their anataomy, the innards and all, and that’s what got me to thinking, you know.
Much more after the jump!
MS: How’d you wind up in the tropics?
CD: I kissed up to Robert FitzRoy (the Captain of the HMS Beagle) and he let me carry his bags on what was supposed to be a two-year expedition along the coastline of South America.
MS: Sounds a little “Gilligan’s Island.”
CD: We wound up being out there five years (1831-1836) but I don’t think we charted any island called Gilligan, and I took copius notes.
MS: You got incredibly seasick. How’d you deal with that?
CD: I vomited a lot. Just plain hurled overboard. I also spent as much time as I could on land writing in my diary (a 770 page whopper, with 1750 pages of notes, and 12 catalogs of 5436 bones, skins, shells and carcasses). All told, I only spent 18 months aboard that ship.
MS: Does the theory of evolution mean there is no god?
CD: No, I think it’s compatible with a belief in god. It’s quite possible god made the earth, and let the natural laws of evolution take over. No need to be a complete control freak….
MS: But you are agnostic.
CD: I am – but I’m well aware that the mystery of the beginning of all things is going to remain as such.
MS: This thing about acquired characteristics. Does it mean humans will lose their little toes at some point?
CD: The theory is that, over time, new generations’ individual traits become enhanced with repeated use–
MS: Like opposable thumbs.
CD: Right-o. And that they can be removed if we don’t use ‘em. So perhaps your great-great-great grandkids will have one less toe. But I doubt it. More likely, they’ll be playing video games with their feet, talking on the phone and driving with their bloody noses!
MS: Let’s talk about the theory of “creationism” –
CD: Bible stories.
MS: Well today they’re calling creationism, Intelligent Design. Any thoughts on that label?
CD: I guess I’d have to say that any intelligent designer that made 99.9 percent of every organism he or she designed go extinct, couldn’t be all that intelligent.
MS: You really did anger some Bible Thumpers with your theory of evolution.
CD: I can understand that. If you want to keep telling the Adam and Eve story – creationism – it’s hard to allow for evolution. We either got put on the earth by god as fully formed people, or we evolved from something a little less human.
MS: On a personal note, you found an odd way to decide whether or not to marry.
CD: Oh, the list!
MS: Go on.
CD: Well, you know, I was quite the cataloguer, so I drew up a little cost-benefit analysis on the concept of marriage. Pros and cons, that sort of thing.
MS: How’d that turn out?
CD: The advantages clearly outweighed the disadvantages, and I asked Emma Wedgwood (1808-1896) to marry me.
MS: She was your first cousin. Talk about evolutionary theories….
CD: If that’s meant to be a slight, I do not appreciate it.
MS: Gotta clear something out – cuz I don’t like being compared to an ape. My wife does that. See, if one accepts that humans were descended from animals, it’s also true that humans are animals.
CD: Arrrgh.
MS: So, in the end, my great-great relative’s some sort of ape?
CD: That’s a misconception, dear man, and the reason everyone ran around at one point looking for the “missing link.” It’s also the reason I waited 20 years to publish my book.
MS: So, am I a monkey or not?
CD: You’re not an anthropoid ape. Our relationship to chimps is through a common ancestor, not through direct descent. And we’re talking about something that happened ten million years ago, so you can stop looking in that family tree you have there…
MS: Ever hear of the Darwin Awards?
CD: No.
MS: You’ll like this: They give an award each year to commemorate individuals who protect our gene pool by making the ultimate sacrifice of their own lives.
CD: They kill themselves? Bugger right off?
MS: Yeah, but in an extremely idiotic manner, thereby improving our species’ chance of long-term survival. Dolts who eat anthrax or jam forks into light sockets, that kinda thing.
CD: Evolution in action – trial and fatal error. I like it. Now put down the chainsaw, sonny.
END OF INTERVIEW
the chainsaw of natural selection!!! (click for “my” website)
posted by moonablaze on 10-8-2007 at 1:00 pm
“Right or wrong, Darwin’s greatest accomplishment was to begin the debate and move the concept of evolution into the realm of serious scientific thought.”
There is no genuine debate about whether Darwin was right or wrong, there are those who accept the decades of scientific research and there are those who are either too stupid to understand it or who are so desperate to protect their world view they would argue that gravity is “just a theory” as they leap from a tall building.
I dare you to publish an article with the phrase Christianity “right or wrong” in it. There’s more evidence that silly religion is just a load of nonsense but you probably don’t have the backbone to tackle that either.
So much for being a site for smart people. Or is cowardice a sign if intelligence?
How about you EVOLVE some backbone and stand up to the Christian Taliban. Until then you might as well be an accomplice in dragging the world into a new dark age dictated by Religious tyranny and fear.
posted by Martin Bentley on 10-8-2007 at 2:27 pm
Mr. Bentley,
I appreciate your ferocious response, and hope you understand that my intent is to do the research on the (dead) individuals, and allow them to speak for themselves, leaving the rest of us to decide for ourselves what we believe.
As for the debate on if Darwin was “right or wrong,” Mr. Darwin also had the theory that males are more evolutionarily advanced than females – so I’m going to pick n’ choose what “evidence” – scientific or otherwise – I accept as fact.
posted by Michael Stusser on 10-8-2007 at 3:03 pm
so great to see these on the site now! great, hilarious addition. welcome michael! big fan here…
posted by David on 10-8-2007 at 5:48 pm
These Dead Guy Interviews are allways a kick. The personalities of each interviewee is dead on, and cheers to working in the Darwin Awards.
posted by heather on 10-9-2007 at 1:02 am
Martin Bentley,
There IS debate on the validity of Darwin’s THEORY of Evolution… It is a theory, one of many on how human beings came to exist. Right now it is a widely accepted theory, that does not mean that people don’t discuss it, or debate the tenets of said theory. Just because I choose not to believe in a THEORY does not mean that I am an uneducated or stupid individual. I am bilingual, graduated Magna Cum Laude, have lived in 4 countries on 3 continents, have an IQ of 133, have studied and examined the theory of evolution, and come to the conclusion that I disagree with the major tenets of the theory. (I am in no way a scientist, but I can read and research information for myself.)
I take some offense to the way you attacked an entire group of individuals for their beliefs. I am a Christian, but quite frankly, it isn’t just the Christian right (I’m not a Republican by the way) that disagrees with evolution, there are many scientists, people of other faiths, and others who don’t agree with Darwin’s evolutionary theory. I don’t attack your belief system, I’d appreciate it if you didn’t attack mine. You can disagree with someone without belittling them.
One of the reasons that I like this site so much is that people don’t make negative, derogatory comments in the blog. It’s refreshing to see, and I hope that this site will continue to be a place where intelligent, thoughtful, and positive interaction can take place.
posted by greenstrawberries on 10-9-2007 at 3:52 am
It’s a fun premise, seems well done–I can’t wait for the book to arrive from Amazon.com.
I don’t look for literature of this type to unlock the secrets of the universe. A chuckle or two with a non-pedantic shot of human interest will do nicely, thank you.
posted by Tom on 10-9-2007 at 8:17 am