<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>mental_floss &#187; Meghan Holohan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/author/meghan/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs</link>
	<description>Feel Smart Again</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 02:02:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Is Your Name to Blame for All Your Problems?</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/114555</link>
		<comments>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/114555#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Meghan Holohan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anthropology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Relationships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baby names]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[current event]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[current events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[current news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nominative determinism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/?p=114555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Name tag image via Shutterstock As Juliet bemoans the grudge her family has against Romeo&#8217;s based on their names, she says, &#8220;What&#8217;s in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet.&#8221; Apparently, there&#8217;s a lot more in a name than Juliet thought—especially if your name is Mandy [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/boy-named.jpg" alt="" title="boy-named" width="488" height="288" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-113628" /></p>
<p><em><a href="http://www.shutterstock.com/cat.mhtml?lang=en&#038;search_source=search_form&#038;version=llv1&#038;anyorall=all&#038;safesearch=1&#038;searchterm=name+tag&#038;search_group=&#038;orient=&#038;search_cat=&#038;searchtermx=&#038;photographer_name=&#038;people_gender=&#038;people_age=&#038;people_ethnicity=&#038;people_number=&#038;commercial_ok=&#038;color=&#038;show_color_wheel=1#id=69846436&#038;src=468ce824282f8fd9f801d801f1500292-1-48">Name tag image</a> via Shutterstock</em></p>
<p>As Juliet bemoans the grudge her family has against Romeo&#8217;s based on their names, she says, &#8220;What&#8217;s in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet.&#8221; Apparently, there&#8217;s a lot more in a name than Juliet thought—especially if your name is Mandy or Kevin. <a href="http://spp.sagepub.com/content/early/2011/12/22/1948550611431644.abstract">A study finds</a> that people with these names—and other &#8220;bad&#8221; names—are unpopular on dating sites and tend to have poorer self esteem, are lonelier, are less intelligent, and even smoke more.</p>
<p><span id="more-114555"></span>Researchers from Duke University, Humboldt University, and Max Planck Research School created several experiments using the European dating website, <a href="http://www.edarling.org/edarling-studies/stigmatized-names-and-dating-failure">eDarling</a>. In one, the researchers sent an email to 12,000 members. The messages featured matches that exactly mirrored the criteria of each dater and included a person&#8217;s name, age, and location. Because all the other details were identical to what each dater was looking for, their rejections were based on names only. The researchers discovered that people prefer being alone than being with someone with an unbecoming name.</p>
<p>In a second trial, the researchers sent emails without photos to 47,000 German daters. Names like Alexander and Charlotte carried more valence (read: seemed sexier), and these profiles received 102 percent more views than people with less sexy names. Then the researchers compared names to teacher assessments of students and found that those with unattractive names acted more quarrelsome and performed poorly in school, causing the researchers to propose named-based life histories, which include neglect, discrimination, prejudice, and ostracism.</p>
<p>&#8220;Supporting this argument, neglect mediated the relation between negative names and lower self-esteem, more frequent smoking, and less education. These results are consistent with the name-based interpersonal neglect hypothesis: Negative names evoke negative interpersonal reactions, which in turn influence people&#8217;s life outcomes for the worse,&#8221; the authors <a href="http://spp.sagepub.com/content/early/2011/12/22/1948550611431644.abstract">wrote in the paper</a> published in the journal <em>Social Psychological &#038; Personality Science</em>.</p>
<blockquote><h2>More from <em>mental_floss</em>&#8230;</h2>
<p>A Boy Named <a href="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/113625">Brfxxccxxmnpcccclllmmnprxvclmnckssqlbb11116</a><br />
*<br />
How Mister Rogers <a href="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/112878">Saved the VCR</a><br />
*<br />
The Easter Island &#8220;Heads&#8221; <a href="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/106129">Have Bodies</a><br />
*<br />
19 <a href="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/110995">Outstanding Words</a> You Should Be Working Into Conversation<br />
*<br />
New Math: The Time Indiana Tried to <a href="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/93937">Change Pi to 3.2</a><br />
*<br />
Who Wrote the <a href="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/112677">Pledge of Allegiance?</a></p></blockquote>
<p><a target="_blank" href="http://twitter.com/mental_floss"><img id="image25841" src="http://www.mentalfloss.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/twitterbanner.jpg" alt="twitterbanner.jpg" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/114555/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>6 Infamous Arsonists and How They Got Caught</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/112118</link>
		<comments>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/112118#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 04:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Meghan Holohan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arsonists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Burkhart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[los angeles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thomas sweatt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/?p=112118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/112118"> 
<img src="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/los-angeles-arson.jpg" width="300px" border="0" /> 
</a>
<span class="topstory_head"> 
<a href="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/112118">6 Infamous Arsonists and How They Got Caught</a>
</span><br />
<p>In light of the recent string of car fires in LA, here's a look at six notable arsonists.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/los-angeles-arson.jpg" alt="" title="los-angeles-arson" width="560" height="316" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-112174" /></p>
<p><em>Image credit: REUTERS/GENE BLEVINS/LANDO</em></p>
<p>Over 50 fires gutted cars in Los Angeles this past weekend. While most of the damage was limited to vehicles, some of the flames caused destruction to adjacent property, including to a home that once belonged to Jim Morrison. LA has not experienced this many fires since the 1992 riots. On Monday police detained a person of interest, 24-year-old German national Harry Burkhart, who was seen on security footage near one of the fires.</p>
<p>While some people start fires for insurance money or to cover up crimes, arsonists set fires to feel control—and, in many cases, sexual excitement. Profilers say arsonists have few close relationships; they start blazes to feel important. Many only have a high school education, but some of the most prolific showed a surprisingly high degree of intelligence.</p>
<p>Below are 6 of the most notable arsonists. Most are infamous because of the damage they inflicted, but others are remarkable because of their sociopathic behavior.</p>
<h4>1. Julio Gonzalez</h4>
<p><strong>Number of Fires:</strong> One<br />
<strong>People Killed:</strong> 87</p>
<p><strong>Story:</strong> <span id="more-112118"></span>After immigrating to New York City during the Mariel Boatlift in 1980, Julio Gonzalez was working as a warehouse employee when he met Lydia Feliciano, who became his girlfriend. A decade later, after losing his job and getting dumped, a drunk Gonzalez visited Feliciano while she was at work as a coat-check girl at the Happy Land Social Club, an illegal bar in the Bronx. Feliciano begged him to leave, and Gonzalez shouted threats while being thrown out by the bouncer. </p>
<p>After purchasing a dollar&#8217;s worth of gasoline at a nearby gas station, he returned to the club, where he poured the gas over the stairs (the only exit) and threw a match on it. The fire burned so rapidly that patrons didn&#8217;t have time to stop what they were doing and flee. Fire investigators found the dead stopped mid-life. Feliciano was one of the six survivors.</p>
<p><strong>Capture:</strong> Gonzalez watched the firefighters battle the blaze, then went home to nap. When police interviewed the survivors, Feliciano told them about her fight with Gonzalez. Gonzalez admitted to setting the fire. He didn&#8217;t even get rid of the evidence—his gas-soaked clothes were still in his apartment. He was found guilty of 174 charges of murder (two for each person who died) and was sentenced to 25 years for each count, for a total of 4,350 years. The punishment is mostly symbolic, because he will serve the sentences concurrently.</p>
<h4>2. John &#8220;Pillow Pyro&#8221; Orr</h4>
<p><strong>Number of Fires:</strong> About 2,000<br />
<strong>People Killed:</strong> Four<br />
<strong>Cost:</strong> Tens of millions of dollars of property damage</p>
<p><strong>Story:</strong> John Orr hoped to be a Los Angeles police officer, but didn&#8217;t make the cut. Instead, he joined the Glendale Fire Department as an arson investigator. His coworkers thought Orr was strange—he chased down shoplifters and burglars in his fire truck. But they admired his dedication and his uncanny ability to be the first firefighter on the scene. He always knew where the hydrants were, the best way to put out each fire, and how to find the cause of the fire. His colleagues never suspected that Orr was the man they had dubbed the &#8220;Pillow Pyro.&#8221; </p>
<p>Orr used the same incendiary device for all his blazes: a cigarette attached to a book of matches wrapped in paper with cotton and bedding (hence the nickname), secured with a rubber band. The cigarette would burn down, and the matches would ignite the paper and bedding. In 1984, a fire at a local hardware store killed four people—including a 2-year-old child—and destroyed the building and nearby establishments.</p>
<p><strong>Capture:</strong> During an arson investigators conference in Bakersfield, Calif., in January 1987, several suspicious fires broke out. At one of the fires, investigators found a single fingerprint on a piece of notebook paper. Two years later, during another fire investigators conference in Pacific Grove, an outbreak of small fires occurred. Bakersfield&#8217;s arson investigator compared the participants at both conferences and found 10 people attended both. By 1991, the investigators formed the Pillow Pyro task force and published a profile, noting the suspect was most likely an arson investigator from the greater Los Angeles area. The fingerprint found at the first conference was compared to those of the 10 attendees of both conferences; it matched Orr&#8217;s fingerprint. When he was arrested in November 1991, police found cigarettes, rubber bands, and binoculars. </p>
<p>His literary aspirations contributed to his downfall. He wrote a manuscript, called <em>Point of Origin</em>, describing a fireman who was an arsonist, which became damning evidence. He wrote: &#8220;To Aaron, the smoke was beautiful, causing his heart rate to quicken and his breath to come in shallow gasps. He was trying to control his outward appearance and look normal to anyone around him. &#8230; He relaxed and partially stroked his erection, watching the fire.&#8221; Orr is serving life plus 20 years for arson and the four murders.</p>
<h4>3. Raymond Lee Oyler</h4>
<p><strong>Number of Fires:</strong> 24<br />
<strong>People Killed:</strong> Five<br />
<strong>Cost:</strong> The fire destroyed over 40,000 acres, amounting to more than $9 million in damages</p>
<p><strong>Story:</strong> Raymond Lee Oyler was a 36-year-old dim-witted mechanic in Riverdale, Calif. (His own lawyer characterized him as dopey.) He trained for three months to become a volunteer firefighter, but quit. Yet his love affair continued. He began starting small fires, but minor blazes weren&#8217;t enough—he became obsessed with lighting a mountain on fire. He started more and more fires by attaching a Marlboro cigarette to a pack of matches, placing it in the brush, and lighting the cigarette. After bragging to his girlfriend about his fires, she threatened to leave him if he didn&#8217;t stop, so he quit — for six months, before starting again. </p>
<p>In October 2006, investigators say Oyler placed his trademark incendiary device in a gully near Esperanza Avenue in Cabazon. The Santa Ana winds fed the fire and it spread at speeds up to 40 mph, with flames leaping more than 100 feet into the air. The 1,300-degree fire melted guardrails along Highway 243. A truck driver testified that he saw Oyler at a gas station in Banning watching the fire. He claims Oyler said, &#8220;[the fire] is happening just the way I thought it would.&#8221; A wave of fire rolled over five firefighters as they tried to save a house from the blaze; all five died.</p>
<p><strong>Capture:</strong> A $500,000 reward was offered for any information related to the Esperanza blaze. Arson investigators were already looking at Oyler for two smaller fires set in early summer. Both of the cigarettes used to light the flames had Oyler&#8217;s DNA on them. Police officers first arrested him for the two smaller blazes and then later charged him for the Esperanza fire. While there was no DNA on the device that started the Esperanza blaze, it was identical to those with Oyler&#8217;s DNA on them. After a guilty verdict, a judge sentenced Oyler to death.</p>
<h4>4. David &#8220;Son of Sam&#8221; Berkowitz</h4>
<p><strong>Number of Fires:</strong> 1,411<br />
<strong>People Killed / Cost:</strong> Unknown</p>
<p><strong>Story:</strong> The adopted son of Pearl and Nat Berkowitz spent most of his childhood alone. If he didn&#8217;t play baseball, he bullied the other kids. He was large and awkward. When Berkowitz tired of torturing Pearl&#8217;s parakeet, he started fires in buildings across New York and kept detailed diaries of each one. Berkowitz always felt everyone was out to get him; starting fires gave him a feeling of control.</p>
<p><strong>Capture:</strong> Officials weren&#8217;t looking for Berkowitz for his fire-starting habits; they were too busy searching for the Son of Sam, who was terrorizing New York City. But it was Berkowitz&#8217;s love of that fires contributed to his capture. A few days prior to his arrest, Berkowitz started a fire outside his neighbor Craig Glassman&#8217;s door. The Son of Sam had alleged in a letter that Glassman belonged to a cult, which made Berkowitz kill six people and injure seven others. Berkowitz placed .22 bullets near the door in the hope of causing an explosion, but the fire didn&#8217;t burn hot enough to ignite the ammo. Glassman believed his odd neighbor Berkowitz set the fire, and he gave the police threatening notes that Berkowitz had sent him. Based on notes and an eyewitness description of Berkowitz, police arrested him, and he admitted to the six murders.</p>
<h4>5. Peter Dinsdale, a.k.a. Bruce George Peter Lee</h4>
<p><strong>Number of Fires:</strong> More than 30<br />
<strong>People Killed:</strong> 26 people died in 11 fires</p>
<p><strong>Story:</strong> When Peter Dinsdale was just 12-years-old, he went to the house of a classmate, 6-year-old Richard Ellerington, in Hull, England. Arriving before 7 a.m., Dinsdale poured paraffin in a window and tossed a match into the house. The Elleringtons woke and rushed five of their six children from the burning row house. Richard—who was physically handicapped—didn&#8217;t make it out. </p>
<p>The Ellerington fire was one of many fatal fires that Dinsdale set from 1973 to 1979. Dinsdale was a pathetic case; his mother worked as a prostitute and neglected him because she disliked his freakish appearance and epileptic fits. Children made fun of him for his limp and deformed appearance, and adults called him &#8220;Daft Peter.&#8221; He wandered the poor neighborhoods of Hull at night, burning down houses. At 9, he burned down a lumberyard and a shopping district. He claimed to have started a fire in a nursing home that killed 11 men, but it was later deemed accidental. He watched a man stumble around his home ablaze after Dinsdale set the man on fire for clipping his ear. He squirted paraffin in the mail slot of a home, killing a mother and her three sons.</p>
<p><strong>Capture:</strong> On December 4, 1979, Dinsdale doused the porch of the Hastie house with paraffin and lit it on fire. The four Hastie boys and their mother were inside; only one boy survived. The Hasties had bullied, stolen from, and threatened their neighbors, so it seemed everyone was a suspect. Charlie Hastie had allegedly forced Dinsdale to participate in homosexual acts and had blackmailed him. Dinsdale—who had changed his name to Bruce George Peter Lee in honor of martial arts legend Bruce Lee—had left spent matches and a can of paraffin outside the house, so authorities began an arson investigation. An anonymous caller claimed to have seen a car outside the house prior to the fire. Even though police didn&#8217;t suspect the driver of setting the fire, they had few leads and trailed the car. Eventually, Dinsdale admitted he set fire to the Hastie house. He said he didn&#8217;t want to kill them, only to scare Charlie. Then Dinsdale coolly admitted to 10 more fatal fires and showed investigators the location of each. Dinsdale pled guilty to 26 counts of manslaughter and remains in a psychiatric hospital.</p>
<h4>6. Thomas Sweatt</h4>
<p><strong>Number of Fires:</strong> More than 350<br />
<strong>People Killed:</strong> Two confirmed dead, but as many as five<br />
<strong>Cost:</strong> Millions of dollars worth of damage</p>
<p><strong>Story:</strong> When Thomas Sweatt saw an attractive man, he would follow him home, but instead of talking to the object of his affection, Sweatt would set fire to the man&#8217;s house or car. For more than 30 years, Sweatt set hundreds of fires in the metro Washington, DC, area. Sweatt often tossed incendiary devices into police cars and then watched them burn. Each time he set a fire, he used a similar gadget—he would fill a milk jug with gasoline and plug the opening with a piece of clothing that served as a wick. The wick burned plastic for more than 20 minutes and after the fire consumed the container, gas fumes escaped and caught fire. In two different fires, elderly women were unable to escape and later died.</p>
<p><strong>Capture:</strong> At the scene of a fire in Arlington, Va., in December 2004, officials found a pair of pants from a Marine dress uniform. They retrieved DNA from the pants, which matched mystery DNA that investigators had obtained from a strand of hair and wicks from three incendiary devices found at other fires. (Sweatt often used his own clothing as wicks.) When investigators visited a Marine base in southeast Washington, Naval Criminal Investigation Services mentioned that a car often sat outside the base while the driver stared at the Marines. NCIS felt this man was responsible for several car fires on base, but they didn&#8217;t have proof, and the fires had suddenly stopped. For weeks, the police tailed Sweatt before asking him for a DNA sample, which he voluntarily gave. Police matched his DNA to the dress pants and the DNA found at three fires. Sweatt pled guilty to fires in DC, Virginia, and Maryland and is serving a life sentence in a federal prison.</p>
<p>In 2007, friend of <em>mental_floss</em> Dave Jamieson wrote an incredibly detailed (and just incredible) story on the letters he exchanged with Thomas Sweatt for the <em>Washington City Paper</em>. <a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&#038;rct=j&#038;q=&#038;esrc=s&#038;source=web&#038;cd=3&#038;ved=0CDEQFjAC&#038;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtoncitypaper.com%2Farticles%2F1641%2Fletters-from-an-arsonist%2Ffull&#038;ei=qc4DT5bZAsTz0gH1odjuAw&#038;usg=AFQjCNF3qZNfsDppnMnMay3pN0TtTUWy9A&#038;sig2=9yoNo9uVt6mNG1bv1opB5w">Go read it right now</a>. </p>
<blockquote><h2>More from <em>mental_floss</em>…</h2>
<p>Bad Girls Club: Women of the FBI’s <a href="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/87185">Ten Most Wanted List</a><br />
*<br />
Who&#8217;s on the <a href="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/109328">$10,000 Bill?</a><br />
*<br />
9 Presidential Candidates Who <a href="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/101226">Weren&#8217;t Great Students</a><br />
*<br />
Glory Day: Lancaster&#8217;s Brief Stint <a href="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/101689">as Our Nation&#8217;s Capital</a><br />
*<br />
Why Did Muammar Qaddafi Own <a href="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/98839">a Mansion in New Jersey?</a><br />
*<br />
New Math: The Time Indiana Tried to <a href="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/93937">Change Pi to 3.2</a></p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://twitter.com/mental_floss"><img src="http://www.mentalfloss.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/twitterbanner.jpg" alt="twitterbanner.jpg"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/112118/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On Presidents and Life Expectancy</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/110815</link>
		<comments>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/110815#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 15:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Meghan Holohan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BigQuestions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[90s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gerald ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[herbert hoover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john adams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[life expectancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/?p=110815</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In September 1919, President Woodrow Wilson embarked on a cross-country tour to gain support for the Treaty of Versailles and his League of Nations. The grueling schedule required him to give as many as three speeches a day, and at the end of the month he collapsed after a presentation. When Wilson returned to Washington, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/wilson.jpg" alt="" title="wilson" width="200" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-110824" />In September 1919, President Woodrow Wilson embarked on a cross-country tour to gain support for the Treaty of Versailles and his League of Nations. The grueling schedule required him to give as many as three speeches a day, and at the end of the month he collapsed after a presentation. When Wilson returned to Washington, D.C., he suffered <a href="http://www.eyewitnesstohistory.com/wilsonstroke.htm">a massive stroke</a>, which left him partially paralyzed on his left side.<br />
<br />
Although most presidents do not experience such extreme stress-related illnesses while in office, many do show signs of wear and tear. Wrinkles etch their faces and gray hairs become plentiful. Some say that while in office, presidents age twice as fast as a regular man.<br />
<br />
&#8220;We know in the world of biology that you can&#8217;t actually measure the aging of an individual,&#8221; S. Jay Olshansky, PhD, <a href="http://www.history.com/news/2011/12/06/do-u-s-presidents-age-faster-while-in-office/">told history.com</a>. &#8220;There isn&#8217;t any single test that you can take.&#8221;</p>
<p>Olshansky, a professor of public health at the University of Illinois at Chicago and an expert in aging, <a href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/content/306/21/2328.2.short">examined statistics</a> about 34 presidents who died of natural causes. <span id="more-110815"></span>He looked at standard life tables and the dates of each president&#8217;s birth and inauguration and compared the presidents&#8217; ages at inauguration with men the <img src="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/fdr.jpg" alt="" title="fdr" width="200" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-110823" />same age, to determine how long the presidents should live. To counter the argument that commanders in chief age two days for every one of a regular Joe, he subtracted two days for each day a president was in office.<br />
<br />
On average, presidents who die of natural causes lived 73 years compared to 68.1 years they would have lived if they did age faster. From Herbert Hoover through Ronald Reagan, presidents have far exceeded their expected ages. Seven of the eight presidents survived longer than expected, including Franklin Roosevelt <em>(at left)</em>, who died at 63 after serving 12 years in office. (The exception was Lyndon B. Johnson, who died at 64 of heart disease.) Four presidents have lived into their 90s: Gerald Ford, 93.5; Reagan, 93.3; John Adams, 90.7; and Hoover, 90.2. And the first eight presidents of the United States lived until an average age of 79.8 <strike>when most men were dying at 40 years or younger</strike>. (Reader Peter makes a good point below.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/110815/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are High-IQ People More Likely to Use Drugs?</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/108415</link>
		<comments>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/108415#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 20:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Meghan Holohan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[current event]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[current events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[current news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[higher iq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smart kids]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/?p=108415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mat Hayward / Shutterstock.com In 1884, a young researcher named Sigmund Freud was studying the mysteries of the human brain when he wrote an article about cocaine. The scientist extolled its benefits in a paper, “Über Coca,” chronicling how he felt when he used the drug. For the next 12 years, Freud habitually used cocaine [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/smart-kid.jpg" alt="" title="smart-kid" width="500" height="334" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-108418" /></p>
<p><em><a href="http://www.shutterstock.com/gallery-66756p1.html?cr=00&#038;pl=edit-00">Mat Hayward</a> / <a href="http://www.shutterstock.com/?cr=00&#038;pl=edit-00">Shutterstock.com</a></em></p>
<p>In 1884, a young researcher named Sigmund Freud was studying the mysteries of the human brain when he wrote an article about cocaine. The scientist extolled its benefits in a paper, “Über Coca,” chronicling how he felt when he used the drug. For the next 12 years, Freud habitually used cocaine as he wrote some of his most influential works, including his theories about the Oedipus complex, psychoanalysis, and the unconscious mind. </p>
<p>Many people think that Freud was abnormal. Conventional wisdom implies that smarter people are less likely to use drugs. But a <a href="http://jech.bmj.com/content/early/2011/10/28/jech-2011-200252.abstract ">study from Cardiff University in Wales</a> found that people with higher IQs are more likely to indulge in illegal drugs than people of average or lower intelligence.   </p>
<p>Researchers surveyed 7,900 British people born in April 1970. <span id="more-108415"></span>At age 5 and 10, researchers measured their IQs and at 16 and 30, the researchers asked them to fill out surveys about psychological problems and drug use. By age 30, 35% of men and 16% of women admitted to smoking pot at least once in the past year, while 9% of men and 4% of women indulged in cocaine. People who copped to doing drugs also scored higher on IQ tests than those who did not partake. </p>
<p>Women in the top third of IQ scores were five times more likely to have used marijuana or cocaine than those ladies in the bottom third. Men with the highest IQs were almost 50% more likely to use amphetamines and 65% more likely to have used ecstasy. </p>
<p>Lead researcher, James White, provides several theories explaining why smarter people might indulge in drug use more frequently. He says that anti-drug campaigns often provide simple messages that might not appeal to smarter children. Also, bright people may experience more boredom and social isolation than their less intelligent peers. However, he thinks that attitudes might account for the differences: </p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;The likely mechanism is openness to experience,&#8221; White told Time.com, &#8220;and, I think, it&#8217;s also this idea of having an educated view of risk as well.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p><a target="_blank" href="http://twitter.com/mental_floss"><img id="image25841" src="http://www.mentalfloss.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/twitterbanner.jpg" alt="twitterbanner.jpg" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/108415/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Laughter Is the Best Medicine</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/100647</link>
		<comments>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/100647#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 13:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Meghan Holohan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/?p=100647</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While the author of the Book of Proverbs remains uncertain (most likely, King Solomon wrote it), its intent is not. The book was written to share insight, and much conventional wisdom originates in its pages. Proverbs 17:22, &#8220;a merrie heart doth good like a medicine: but a broken spirit drieth the bones,&#8221; has transformed into [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/laughter.jpg" alt="" title="laughter" width="200" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-100673" />While the author of the Book of Proverbs remains uncertain (most likely, King Solomon wrote it), its intent is not. The book was written to share insight, and much conventional wisdom originates in its pages. Proverbs 17:22, &#8220;a merrie heart doth good like a medicine: but a broken spirit drieth the bones,&#8221; has transformed into the popular saying, &#8220;Laughter is the best medicine.&#8221; It turns out that King Solomon, et al., were right: <strong>Laughing has medicinal applications.</strong></p>
<p>Robin Dunbar, from Oxford University, led a team of researchers who <a href="http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/early/2011/09/12/rspb.2011.1373.full" target="blank">evaluated laughter and its impact on pain perception</a> in the lab and at the Edinburgh Fringe Festival. In the lab, participants watched clips of <em>South Park</em> or <em>The Simpsons</em> before or after researchers exposed the subjects to painful experiences—either by tightening a blood pressure cuff on them or slipping a wine chiller on their arms. At the festival, before and after performances, participants stood against a wall with their legs bent at a 90-degree angle as if they were sitting in a chair until it became so painful they fell on the ground. (My pilates instructor makes us do this, but she calls it a workout.)</p>
<p>Previous research suggested that laughter dulls pain, and Dunbar found evidence that supports this claim. <span id="more-100647"></span><strong>Groups that either watched or participated in comedy felt less pain than their peers, who watched a documentary.</strong> And he found that people who laughed more had an even higher pain threshold than those who only let a few giggles escape. <strong>Chuckling with others also increased laughter&#8217;s positive impact</strong>; people are 30 times more likely to laugh in a group than alone. Dunbar believes that laughing triggers endorphins—neurotransmitters produced by the pituitary gland and hypothalamus, which spark a feeling of comfort similar to what occurs when someone takes an opiate. Love, excitement, spicy foods, orgasms, exercise, and pain all cause the brain to produce endorphins, which also provide an analgesic effect.</p>
<p>Dunbar further examined the two types of laughter, Duchenne and non-Duchenne. Duchenne laughter is the type of natural chuckle that people experience when they see or hear something funny, which is often contagious. This giggling involves the contractions of the orbicularis oculi muscle (the muscle that enables the eyelids to close) and Dunbar suspects that this packs more pain relief than non-Duchenne laughter, which is emotionless and context-driven and does not involve any muscle activity. <strong>Duchenne laughter might be so effective because it involves muscle activity much like exercise or a massage, both of which release endorphins.</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/early/2011/09/12/rspb.2011.1373.full" target="blank">Dunbar writes</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;The capacity to sustain laughter for periods of several minutes at a time may exaggerate the opioid effects, thus ramping up the sense of heightened affect that humans experience in these contexts. A key aspect of this may be that social (or Duchenne) laughter is highly socially synchronized. In a study of physical exercise (rowing), synchronized activity ramped up endorphin production.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>So next time you&#8217;re in pain, try watching something funny and having a laugh. It might just help.<br />
***<br />
<font size="1"><em>Shown above: The Yue Minjun &#8220;Amazing Laughter&#8221; sculpture in Vancouver, BC, photographed by Flickr user <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/33237881@N08/" target="blank">Matthew Grapengeiser</a></em></font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/100647/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I bet you think this song, er, research is about you&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/100338</link>
		<comments>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/100338#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 15:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Meghan Holohan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/?p=100338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When young, beautiful Dorian Gray spies himself in the mirror and realizes he will age while his painting remains ageless, he wishes that he could sell his soul to remain beautiful while the painting ages. Miraculously, Gray&#8217;s wish is granted, allowing the narcissistic Gray to live a life of beauty. But Dorian Gray may not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When young, beautiful Dorian Gray spies himself in the mirror and realizes he will age while his painting remains ageless, he wishes that he could sell his soul to remain beautiful while the painting ages. Miraculously, Gray&#8217;s wish is granted, allowing the narcissistic Gray to live a life of beauty. But Dorian Gray may not have possessed the self-awareness that modern day narcissists have—most narcissists know they annoy others.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/narcissus.jpg" alt="" title="narcissus" width="250" height="303" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-100342" />Erika Carlson, a psychology graduate student at Washington University in St. Louis, conducted two studies about narcissism and wrote about them in a paper called &#8220;<a href="http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/psp/101/1/185/" target="blank">You Probably Think This Paper&#8217;s About You</a>.&#8221; In the first study, 110 college students (41 men and 69 women) participated in small groups weekly for an entire semester. When the groups initially met, the students rated one another on 10 personality traits and completed a self-evaluation. Then the groups repeated the exercise during the last week. Narcissists awarded themselves high marks on intelligence, likability, and physical attractiveness during self-assessments, and initially their peers gave the same stellar marks. But by the end of the semester, the narcissists wore on their peers and most lowered their opinions of the more self-involved students. The surprising thing is that the narcissists realized they annoyed the others. (Experts had believed that narcissists weren&#8217;t able to determine how others thought of them.)<br />
<br />
In the second study, 374 Air Force recruits (254 men, 120 women) who spent six months of basic training together evaluated each other at the beginning and end of the time. Because they spent more time together, they were more than mere acquaintances and perhaps better able to evaluate one another. The results were the same—narcissists came off very well at first, but soon became irritations.</p>
<p>Even though they might realize they aggravate others, narcissists most likely believe that they are less popular because others do not realize their genius.<br />
***<br />
<font size="small"><em>Shown above is Caravaggio&#8217;s classic painting of Narcissus, the namesake for narcissists</em></font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/100338/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This Is Your Heart on Chocolate</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/98968</link>
		<comments>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/98968#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 17:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Meghan Holohan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/?p=98968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mayans grew cacao trees in their backyards, blending the beans with vanilla, chili pepper, and achiote to make a bitter, spicy drink known as xocoalt. While Mayans enjoyed consuming the beverage as a treat, they also believed the drink fought fatigue. When Europeans were first introduced to chocolate, they used it to treat upset stomachs. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/real-chocolate-heart.jpg" alt="" title="real-chocolate-heart" width="240" height="240" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-98969" />Mayans grew cacao trees in their backyards, blending the beans with vanilla, chili pepper, and achiote to make a bitter, spicy drink known as xocoalt. While Mayans enjoyed consuming the beverage as a treat, they also believed the drink fought fatigue. When Europeans were first introduced to chocolate, they used it to treat upset stomachs. More recently, reports have shown that chocolate improves moods. And a new study found that consuming chocolate <a href="http://www.bmj.com/content/343/bmj.d4488">reduces one’s risk</a> of developing heart disease.<br />
<br />
Oscar Franco, from the University of Cambridge, looked at seven previously published studies on the benefits of chocolate consumption. These seven studies included about 100,000 people. Five of the seven studies reported a benefit to eating chocolate and Franco discovered that people who ate the highest amount of chocolate had a 37 percent lower chance of heart disease and 29 percent lessened risk of stroke. </p>
<p>While Franco did not look at why chocolate lovers seemed to have a lowered risk of heart disease, he suspects that chocolate’s antioxidants and anti-inflammatory traits provide extra protection to the heart. </p>
<p>However, researchers did not look at other aspects of the participants lives—so Franco cannot be sure that the lessened risk for cardiac problems was related to chocoholism or not. And don’t go running out for candy bars just yet. Many of the processed chocolate confections contain a lot of fat, sugar, and calories—all known to play a role in heart disease. </p>
<p><em>[Image courtesy of <a href="http://www.pushindaisies.com/candypress/scripts/prodView.asp?idproduct=224">PushinDaisies.com</a>]</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/98968/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does Diet Soda Make You Fat?</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/92905</link>
		<comments>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/92905#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 08:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Meghan Holohan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/?p=92905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Internet has helped rumors about aspartame become more exaggerated—it&#8217;s been said to cause seizures, lupus, autism, Gulf War syndrome (huh?) and more. But researchers from School of Medicine at the University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio report that diet soda with aspartame causes health problems unrelated to chain emails. Consuming aspartame is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/aspartame.jpg" alt="" title="aspartame" width="220" height="180" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-92907" />The Internet has helped rumors about aspartame become more exaggerated—it&#8217;s been said to cause seizures, lupus, autism, Gulf War syndrome (huh?) and more. But researchers from School of Medicine at the University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio report that diet soda with aspartame causes health problems unrelated to chain emails. Consuming aspartame is linked to increased waistlines, which contributes to a host of medical problems. Longtime aspartame consumption also contributes to insulin resistance.<br />
<br />
Researchers from San Antonio Health Science Center looked at data from 474 participants in the San Antonio Longitudinal Study of Aging (SALSA). <span id="more-92905"></span>When subjects enrolled in SALSA, researchers recorded their height, weight, waist circumference, and diet soda intake. Over the next decade, researchers conducted follow-up exams and compared diet soda drinkers to non-diet soda drinkers. Diet soda drinkers saw a 70 percent increase in waist circumference (compared to non-diet soda drinkers). Users who consumed two or more diet sodas a day saw their waistlines increase 500 percent more than the non-diet soft drinking group. Excessive abdominal fat correlates with a higher risk of diabetes and also increases the chances of diseases such as colorectal cancer or high blood pressure. </p>
<p>&#8220;These results suggest that, amidst the national drive to reduce consumption of sugar-sweetened drinks, policies that would promote the consumption of diet soft drinks may have unintended deleterious effects,&#8221; the researchers wrote. They presented their findings at the American Diabetes Association&#8217;s Scientific Sessions. </p>
<p>In a separate study, researchers looked at how aspartame influenced mice’s fasting glucose levels. Typically, a person’s glucose level is lowest after eight hours of fasting and doctors sometimes test the amount of glucose in the blood at this time to determine diabetes. The researchers, also from San Antonio, fed two groups of mice chow—both varieties included corn oil, but one had aspartame. After three months of guzzling sweetened, fatty chow, the mice in the aspartame group showed increased level of fasting blood glucose and diminished insulin levels, which indicates early decline in pancreatic beta cell function. Beta cells produce insulin, which naturally regulates blood glucose. Faulty beta cells negatively impacts insulin production, leading to Type II diabetes. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/92905/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>10 Technology Prizes That Propelled Us Forward</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/92323</link>
		<comments>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/92323#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 15:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Meghan Holohan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Story]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/?p=92323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/92323"> 
<img src="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/lindbergh-300.jpg" width="300px" border="0" /> 
</a>
<span class="topstory_head"> 
<a href="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/92323">10 Tech Prizes <br />That Propelled Us Forward</a>
</span><br />
<p>Sometimes, people just need a little incentive. Here are 10 technology-related prizes that helped move us forward.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes, people just need a little added incentive. Here are 10 technology-related prizes that helped move us forward. </p>
<h4>1. Orteig Prize</h4>
<p><img src="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/lindbergh-prize.jpg" alt="" title="lindbergh-prize" width="225" height="299" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-92325" />In 1919, French-born, New York City hotelier Raymond Orteig offered a $25,000 prize to the first pilot who made a solo flight across the Atlantic Ocean. For years, pilots gave it a shot and many paid with their lives. In May 1927, an unknown mail pilot arrived at Roosevelt Field in Long Island with a monoplane and intentions of winning the prize.<br />
<br />
Veteran pilots laughed at his attempt to use a monoplane (biplanes were the standard), but on May 21, after more than 33 hours of flight, 25-year-old Charles Lindbergh landed at Le Bourget Airport in Paris. After his flight was certified, Lindbergh won the $25,000 prize and interest in flight increased dramatically—applications for pilots’ licenses increased by 300 percent, the numbers of licensed aircrafts increased by 400 percent, and U.S. airline passengers rose from 5,782 in 1926 to 173,405 in 1929. </p>
<p>The Orteig Prize is considered the inspiration for many other prizes and was influential in growing the airline industry to what it is today. </p>
<h4>2. The Longitude Prize</h4>
<p><span id="more-92323"></span>Sailors found it difficult to determine longitude while sailing across the oceans. Most used dead reckoning, but this proved inaccurate (remember all those explorers who didn’t realize where they landed?) In 1714, the British Parliament enacted the Longitude Prize, offering £20,000 to the person who determined longitude within 30 nautical miles. </p>
<p>John Harrison was a poorly educated joint worker who became known for his precision clocks. In 1730, he started constructing the H1, a clock that worked for only one day, but provided excellent time and longitudinal measurements. He subsequently provided more and more prototypes until he created H4—and H5 and K1, basically copies of H4—which helped sailors pinpoint longitude. While many suspected his pocket watch was a fluke, it eventually became the standard. However, he didn’t win the prize until 1773, when he was well into his 70s. </p>
<h4>3. Fredkin Prize</h4>
<p>Edward Fredkin was an early innovator in artificial intelligence and computer science, creating the Fredkin gate, a circuit usable in reverse computing. In 1980, Fredkin issued a challenge to fellow computer scientists—$100,000 to the first team to build a computer that bests a chess grandmaster. </p>
<p><img src="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/kasparov-deep-blue.jpg" alt="" title="kasparov-deep-blue" width="550" height="372" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-79538" /></p>
<p>In 1996, IBM’s Deep Blue squared off against Garry Kasparov, a Russian grandmaster who achieved his title in 1985, at the age of 22. Deep Blue was a descendant of IBM computer scientist Feng Hsu’s ChipTest and Deep Thought—developed when Hsu was a graduate student at Carnegie Mellon University. (Kasparov had easily defeated Deep Thought twice.) Deep Blue became the first computer to win a game against a reigning world champion, but Kasparov won the match 4 to 2. But on May 11, 1997, Deep Blue beat Kasparov in the final round of a tied, six game match. Kasparov demanded a rematch, but IBM dismantled the computer. On July 29, 1997, Hsu, Murray Campbell, and A. Joseph Hoane Jr. won the $100,000. </p>
<h4>4. Kremer Prizes</h4>
<p>We had been promised a future where everyone buzzes around with jetpacks, but human-powered flight has yet to become a reality. In 1959, Henry Kremer created a series of prizes to encourage human flight. </p>
<p>On August 23, 1977, Paul MacCready won £50,000 when his Gossamer Condor, a lightweight human powered flying machine, became the first to fly a figure eight around two markers. In 1979, MacCready won £100,000 when his Gossamer Albatross flew from England to France—the first human-powered aircraft to cross the English Channel. Bryan Allen piloted (or pedaled) both crafts. In 1983, a group of MIT designers won £20,000 when their MIT Monarch B craft beat the speed record by completing a 1.5 dm course in less than three minutes with an average speed of 32km/h. No word on when the rest of us can commute with a pedaled flying machine. </p>
<h4>5. Ansari X Prize</h4>
<p>In 1996, Dr. Peter Diamandis read an article about Charles Lindbergh and learned about the Orteig Prize. Ever since he&#8217;d watched the moon landing as a fifth-grader, he&#8217;d been fascinated by space travel. But he&#8217;d grown tired of waiting for space travel to become prevalent. After starting several private companies to encourage space travel, he decided to offer a prize for commercial space travel. He partnered with the Ansari family to offer the Ansari X Prize, a $10 million award to the first team that carried three people 100 km into space twice within a two-week span. (He founded the X Foundation, which awards a variety of prizes for technological achievements.) </p>
<p>After eight years of development, Burt Rutan’s SpaceShipOne, piloted by Brian Binnie, accomplished the feat, with the help of software and funding from Paul Allen. Rutan—known for building the aircraft Voyager, which traveled across the world without stopping or refueling in 1986—went on to work with Richard Branson and Virgin Galactic. </p>
<h4>6. DARPA Grand Challenge</h4>
<p>In 2004, DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency within the Department of Defense) offered a $1 million prize to the first team whose unmanned vehicle traversed 150 miles of desert terrain. Not one of 15 teams made it past the eight-mile mark. DARPA upped the ante in 2005, offering $2 million to the first team to build an autonomous vehicle that travels across 132-mile course under 10 hours. </p>
<p><img src="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/stanley1.jpg" alt="" title="stanley" width="550" height="366" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-92329" /></p>
<p>Stanford University’s vehicle, Stanley, a Volkswagen Touareg, chugged across the arid landscape at an average speed of 19.1 mph to finish the course in six hours and 53 minutes. Four other vehicles crossed the finish line, but many could not navigate the course within the 10-hour time limit. </p>
<p>In 2007, DARPA sponsored the Urban Challenge, in which autonomous vehicles had to travel a 55-mile urban course and heed all traffic laws. Of the six teams that finished the course, Carnegie Mellon University’s Tartan Racing team won. Their Chevy Tahoe, Boss, averaged about 14 mph and arrived at the finish line 20 minutes before the second place team. Boss interacted with the other robots in the course, pausing at a four-way stop sign, and adhering to California state traffic laws. Experts consider these robots smarter because they mingled with one another—without wrecking. </p>
<h4>7. Society for the Encouragement of Industry</h4>
<p>During the Napoleonic Wars, the general couldn’t wage war throughout the summer and spring because his food stores would go bad—negatively impacting his soldiers’ performance. So Napoleon offered a prize of 12,000 francs to the inventor who discovered a way to preserve food. </p>
<p>In <strike>1809</strike> 1795, Nicolas Appert, a chef, began experimenting with preservation. He believed that food should be stored in glass bottles, much like wine. After about 14 years of experimentation, he presented the government with the Appert method—placing food in bottles, corking and sealing the opening with wax, then boiling the bottles in water. This method extended the freshness of perishable items. Napoleon was so pleased with this method, he personally awarded Appert the 12,000 francs. Years later, tin cans and Pasteurization improved the method to that of modern canning. </p>
<h4>8. MPrize </h4>
<p>Mice don&#8217;t live very long. The Methuselah Foundation, which supports extending human life in a healthy way, started the MPrize in 2003 to inspire researchers to extend the lives of mice—and eventually develop therapies that also work on humans. </p>
<p>The foundation awards two prizes to researchers—one for longevity and one for rejuvenation. David Sharp won a Special MPrize for Lifespan Achievement for his work on the first pharmaceutical intervention for elderly mice. Andrezej Bartke won an MPrize for Longevity for his growth hormone receptor gene knockout mouse. Steven Spindler used calorie restriction to halt the process of aging, which earned him an MPrize for rejuvenation. His mice lived an average of 1356 days with a diet that increased lifespan and reduced age-related diseases and cancers. The fountain of youth may be a low calorie diet. </p>
<h4>9. Deutsch-Archdeacon Grand Prix de Aviation</h4>
<p>Raymond Orteig was not the first Frenchman to support aviation by funding a prize. In 1904, Ernest Archdeacon and Henri Deutsch de la Meurthe pooled 50,000 francs to award to the first pilot who flew a one-kilometer circular course. Henri Farman, a former bicycle and auto racer, abandoned street races after an injury and turned to flying. He modified airplanes after receiving them from manufacturers. In 1907, he won the Archdeacon Cup (same Archdeacon) for flying 150 meters in one minute, 14 seconds—the first flight exceeding a minute in a non-Wright Brothers plane. In 1908, he completed the closed circular course of one kilometer in one minute, winning the 50,000 francs. His Henri Farman III plane became the most popular European biplane in use prior to the Great War. </p>
<h4>10. The Google Lunar X Prize </h4>
<p><img src="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/google-lunar.jpg" alt="" title="google-lunar" width="550" height="171" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-92332" /></p>
<p>Peter Diamandis, founder of the Ansari X Prize and the X Foundation, decided that one space-related prize wasn’t enough. He started the Google Lunar X Prize in 2007, encouraging privately funded companies to land on the moon before a government agency. </p>
<p>To do this, the X Prize Foundation, Google, and other partners offer a prize of about $30 million (the total prize money depends on whether the teams take certain incentives or not). The teams must build a rover and a lander and launch them prior to 2015. Once the lander rests on the moon’s surface, the rover must traverse 500 meters, send high quality images and video to Earth. Some teams plan on visiting historical sites on the moon for additional money. (Yes, there are historic sites on the moon; for example, the Apollo landing sites and the Sea of Tranquility.)  </p>
<p>Each team must obtain 90 percent of its funding from private sources. One team, Astrobotic, announced it secured a launch with Elon Musk’s SpaceX on a Falcon 9 rocket in December 2013. If the team takes off on its scheduled date and everything goes smoothly, it will win the prize. No other teams have announced launch dates.</p>
<blockquote><h2>More from <em>mental_floss</em>&#8230;</h2>
<p>Get Out! How 8 Dictators <a href="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/85627">Spent Their Exile Years</a><br />
*<br />
Bad Girls Club: Women of the FBI&#8217;s <a href="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/87185">Ten Most Wanted List</a><br />
*<br />
Oh the Places <a href="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/61518">Your Ashes Will Go!</a><br />
*<br />
Where Do <a href="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/83226">Baby Carrots</a> Come From?<br />
*<br />
Little-Known <a href="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/48537">Second Verses</a> of 10 Children’s Songs</p></blockquote>
<p><a target="_blank" href="http://twitter.com/mental_floss"><img id="image25841" src="http://www.mentalfloss.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/twitterbanner.jpg" alt="twitterbanner.jpg" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/92323/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Forget Your Password: Typing Rhythm and Computer Security</title>
		<link>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/89900</link>
		<comments>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/89900#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Meghan Holohan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/?p=89900</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Patricia Loring, a research associate at Carnegie Mellon University, presses tiny blue dots on my fingers and the back of my hand. She tells me to adjust the keyboard as she maneuvers three webcams. On a monitor, I see a split screen, displaying images of my hands and posture (which is terrible). The blue stickers [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/iStock_000007384492-keyboard.jpg" alt="" title="iStock_000007384492-keyboard" width="300" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-90137" />Patricia Loring, a research associate at Carnegie Mellon University, presses tiny blue dots on my fingers and the back of my hand. She tells me to adjust the keyboard as she maneuvers three webcams. On a monitor, I see a split screen, displaying images of my hands and posture (which is terrible). The blue stickers make it easier for the cameras to record my finger movements.<br />
<br />
She tells me to look at a picture, Norman Rockwell’s <em>Girl with Black Eye</em>, and compose an email about it. I must type uninterrupted until I fill a text box, which probably holds about 400 words. I cannot talk and she tells me to not worry about my grammar or errors. </p>
<p>I am typing as a participant in a study led by Roy Maxion, a PhD research professor of computer science at CMU. He thinks that typing rhythms and the timing of keystrokes might be able to be used as a biometric, adding another level of security to computers. Keystroke biometrics could also be used in criminal cases. </p>
<p>Computer scientists have known about keystroke biometrics for years, but the research has been conducted in a haphazard way. Maxion is taking a fresh look. If the theories are correct, each person’s typing rhythm is different. Nobody could mimic another person&#8217;s rhythm.  </p>
<h4>Typecasting</h4>
<p>Since the 1800s and the rise of the telegraph, there has been evidence that each individual possesses a unique typing style. </p>
<p><span id="more-89900"></span>“The original idea came from the 1800s with the telegraph—one person could tell who was on the other end of the line because of the rhythm of the dots and dashes,” Maxion says.  </p>
<p>During World War II, telegraph operators transmitted covert messages using Morse code. While each side used encrypted messages, the British still listened to the German cables and soon discovered they could identify certain telegraph operators by their typing rhythms, what telegraph operators (and ham radio aficionados) refer to as an operator’s fist. After realizing what operator was attached to what battalion, the British could track the German troop movement—even though they didn’t understand the messages. </p>
<p>In the 1970s, a researcher with the Rand Corporation produced a small study on keystroke rhythms. The researcher looked at six different typists, noticing each one had a different tempo and he could identify each by their typing beat. In the following decades, researchers replicated the studies, but sometimes there were too many variables. For example, some researchers ask participants to log into a site from their home computer to type, but this presents a problem. “Everyone has a different keyboard so you don’t know if the keyboard influences typing,” Maxion explains. (The keyboard in Maxion’s lab felt tight, which probably slowed my typing.) </p>
<h4>Typing Tests</h4>
<p>Maxion conducts a variety of different experiments to determine typing rhythm. In one set, he asked a number of subjects to come to the lab and learn a password, which is 10 characters long. At first, all the subjects struggle to learn the string of characters, but soon they do, a pattern emerges—each person’s beat is different. Of 28 people typing the 10-character passwords, Maxion can identify typists with 99.97 percent accuracy. Even though this is an incredibly low error rate, Maxion feels he cannot say with certainty that everyone has a unique typing style. </p>
<p>“Our own work would suggest that keystrokes are unique,” Maxion says. But he adds a caveat: “The more people, the more likely that two people’s typing rhythms will be too similar to tell them apart.”</p>
<p>By including an individual’s typing rhythm as an additional layer of protection, it makes it almost impossible for an imposter to access a computer from the keyboard login.  “If you knew my password, you could access my computer,” he says. But it is exceedingly difficult (if not impossible) to mimic another’s typing cadence. </p>
<p>In the lab, as I typed an email to my mother about my fictitious redheaded child who&#8217;d gotten into a fight because a classmate called her a ginger, I was helping Maxion and Loring gather data for a different experiment—to see if a typist can be identified by her unique style as she types throughout the day, offering continuous re-authentication. In some high security jobs, it is important to prompt the user to re-identify herself to prevent imposters from accessing information or changing sensitive documents. This might also prove useful for prosecutors in white-collar crimes, where documents may have been altered. </p>
<p>After I finish weaving a tale about my imaginary offspring, Loring asks me to place my right hand on what looks like grid paper used in high school math classes. She positions my hands, spreading my fingers wider, asking me to keep my wrist straight. She snaps a picture. On to the left. My hands will join pictures of hundreds of others.</p>
<p>“Even the size of hands can influence keystrokes,” Maxion explains. </p>
<p>Loring tells me I&#8217;m a well-behaved typist—I show the hallmarks of someone who learned to type in a class. My typing teacher would be pleased.</p>
<p><em>For more information about Maxion’s research, check out his publications at <a href="http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~maxion/pubs/list.html">cs.cmu.edu</a>. </em></p>
<blockquote><h2>More from <em>mental_floss</em>&#8230;</h2>
<p>Why <a href="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/89826">QWERTY?</a><br />
*<br />
WTF? Initials That Meant <a href="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/63487">More Than They Realized</a><br />
*<br />
The Last King of New Jersey: The Suburban Life of <a href="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/88502">Napoleon’s Brother</a><br />
*<br />
Ray Cats, Artificial Moons and the Atomic Priesthood: Plans to <a href="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/84797">Protect Our Nuclear Waste</a><br />
*<br />
How Did the <a href="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/79429">Duck Hunt Gun</a> Work?</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://twitter.com/mental_floss" target="_blank"><img id="image25841" src="http://www.mentalfloss.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/twitterbanner.jpg" alt="twitterbanner.jpg" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/89900/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

