The Electoral College is an anachronistic system used in the United States to elect our president.

It was created to address a series of technical and political problems that were present in the early days of our democracy—most notably, the issues of slow communications (it took tremendous time and effort to get vote tallies back to Washington from distant states) and of suffrage (the idea of a pure popular vote was a hard sell when you had Southern states containing large populations of enslaved African Americans and unenfranchised women). But we've been doing this national election thing for a few hundred years, the suffrage issue is sorted out, and we have good telecommunications—so why do we still have the Electoral College? In a word: Federalism. In a few more words: The framers of our Constitution deliberately set up an indirect democracy.

There are lots of interesting arguments for and against the system, and a few are discussed in the videos below.

In this trio of videos, C.G.P. Grey explains the issues inherent in the Electoral College system, and points out examples of how it has caused arguably unfair results in the past—including four elections in which the candidate who didn't win the popular vote did win the election. (To be clear, under the rules, those candidates won fair and square; the question at hand is whether the rules themselves are fair.) Take a look, and consider the question: Is this system really fair?

Also relevant: The Electoral College Survival Guide; How Do We Break a Presidential Election Tie?; and How Nate Silver Predicted Obama’s Win (the first time, anyway).