Your Apple Watch Can Now Be Paired With an FDA-Approved EKG Monitor

AliveCor
AliveCor

In addition to being able to tell time and message friends, the Apple Watch serves as a wearable health and fitness tracker: It can offer workout suggestions, monitor your heart rate, and even help detect sleep apnea in sufferers.

Now, when paired with a third-party band dubbed the AliveCor KardiaBand, it can offer something new to the Apple line: functionality as part of an FDA-approved medical device for EKG monitoring.

To be clear, the Apple Watch itself wasn’t subject to FDA approval: The company doesn’t want to slow down its development schedule by seeking the stamp of a government review process. The approval was granted to the KardiaBand wrist strap accessory, which delivers EKG monitoring that can detect signs of atrial fibrillation (heart arrhythmia) or abnormal heart rhythm by having wearers place a thumb on the band sensor and wait 30 seconds. Unusual readings can then be passed along to your doctor. (The device can differentiate between a high heart rate due to exertion and one outside the boundaries of a body at rest.)

EKG, or electrocardiography, is typically performed only in hospitals, where the heart’s electrical activity can be continuously monitored via skin-placed electrodes. Having the ability to perform the same function at home could provide early warning signs of serious complications stemming from atrial fibrillation, like a heart attack or stroke.

The KardiaBand is available now for $199. While not required, a subscription to AliveCor’s monitoring software adds cloud storage and monthly physician reports and costs $99 annually.

[h/t 9to5mac.com]

Pandemic vs. Epidemic: What’s the Difference?

If scientists can't develop a vaccine for a new virus quickly enough, an epidemic can turn into a pandemic.
If scientists can't develop a vaccine for a new virus quickly enough, an epidemic can turn into a pandemic.
doble-d/iStock via Getty Images

As the new coronavirus continues to spread around the world, the words epidemic and pandemic are showing up in news reports more often than they usually do. While the terms are closely related, they don’t refer to the same thing.

As the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC) explains on its website, “an epidemic occurs when an infectious disease spreads rapidly to many people.” Usually, what precedes an epidemic is an outbreak, or “a sudden rise in the number of cases of a disease.” An outbreak can affect a single community or several countries, but it’s on a much smaller scale than an epidemic.

If an epidemic can’t be contained and keeps expanding its reach, public health officials might start calling it a pandemic, which means it’s affected enough people in different areas of the world to be considered a global outbreak. In short, a pandemic is a worldwide epidemic. It infects more people, causes more deaths, and can also have widespread social and economic repercussions. The spread of the Spanish influenza from 1918 to 1919, which killed between 20 and 40 million people around the world, was a pandemic; more recently, the H1N1 influenza created a pandemic in 2009.

Here’s where it gets a little tricky: There’s no cut-and-dried classification system for outbreaks, epidemics, and pandemics. Based on the definitions above, it might seem like the current coronavirus disease, now called COVID-19, falls into the pandemic category already—according to a map from the World Health Organization (WHO), there are more than 80,000 confirmed cases in 34 countries, and nearly 2700 people have died from the disease. It’s also beginning to impact travel, stock markets, and the global economy as a whole. But WHO maintains that although the situation has the potential to become a pandemic, it’s still an epidemic for now.

“It really is borderline semantics, to be honest with you,” Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, told CNN earlier this month. “I think you could have people arguing each end of it. Pandemics mean different things to different people.”

[h/t APIC.org]

Scotland Could Become the First Country to Provide Universal Period Products to Citizens

emapoket, iStock via Getty Images
emapoket, iStock via Getty Images

Fears over where to find—and how to afford—sanitary products before their next menstrual cycle may no longer be an issue for people in Scotland. Earlier today, as the BBC reports, Members of Scottish Parliament passed the first part of a bill that would make items like pads and tampons free to the public.

The Period Products Bill was first put forth in 2017 to address period poverty, which affects people who are unable to afford essential menstrual hygiene products. Pads, tampons, and some reusable menstrual items are currently available to students in primary schools and universities in the country. The Scottish government has also expanded the program to include additional public places and sports clubs, but this new bill goes even further. If passed, Scotland would become the first country to provide free period products to citizens on a universal scale.

Ministers in the Scottish Parliament were initially concerned about the bill's £24 million ($31 million) annual price tag, but earlier this month, members of all parties in the government came out in support of the legislation. Though the bill passed through the first stage of parliament today, February 25, the BBC wrote that "The government is expected to put forward a raft of amendments to address their 'significant' concerns about the legislation," including the aforementioned cost.

Period poverty is an issue that's felt around the world. In America, many lawmakers are fighting to end the "tampon tax": a sales tax that's added to sanitary products and waived from other hygiene products deemed essential in many states, like dandruff shampoo.

[h/t BBC]

SECTIONS

arrow
LIVE SMARTER